On some persuasive strategies in technical discourse: Cross-cultural analysis of directives in English and Czech technical manuals

Adam, M., 2017. Persuasion in religious discourse: Enhancing credibility in sermon titles and openings. Discourse and Interaction, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 5-25.10.5817/DI2017-2-5Search in Google Scholar

Blake, G. and Bly, R. W., 1993. The elements of technical writing. New York: McMillan.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, P. and Levinson, S., 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Crystal, D. and Davy, D., 1969. Investigating English style. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Dillard, J. P. and Pfau, M., 2002. The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781412976046Search in Google Scholar

Dillard, J. P. and Shen, L. eds., 2013. The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781452218410Search in Google Scholar

Dontcheva-Navratilova, O., 2011. Coherence in political speeches. Faculty of Education work 152. Brno: Masaryk University.Search in Google Scholar

Dontcheva-Navratilova, O., 2018. Persuasion in academic discourse: Cross-cultural variation in Anglophone and Czech academic book reviews. In: J. Pelclová, and L. Wei-lun Lu, eds. Persuasion in public discourse. Cognitive and functional perspectives. John Benjamins, pp. 227-257.10.1075/dapsac.79.11donSearch in Google Scholar

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J., 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Halmari, H., 2005. In search of “successful” political persuasion. A comparison of the styles of Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan. In: H. Halmari and T. Virtanen, eds. Persuasion across genres. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 105-134.10.1075/pbns.130.08halSearch in Google Scholar

Halmari, H. and Virtanen, T. (eds), 2005. Persuasion across genres. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.130Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K., 2002. Directives: Arguments and engagement in academic writing. Applied Linguistics, vol. 23, no.2, pp. 215-239.10.1093/applin/23.2.215Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Johns, A., 1997. Text, role, and context. Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524650Search in Google Scholar

Jucker, A. H., 1997. Persuasion by inference: Analysis of a party political broadcast. Political Linguistics. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, pp. 121-137.10.1075/bjl.11.07jucOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Leech, G., 1983. Principles of pragmatics. New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Leech, G. and Svartvik, J., 1994. A communicative grammar of English. 2nd ed. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, G. R., 1980. On being persuaded: Some basic distinctions. In: M. E. Roloff and G. R. Miller, eds. Persuasion: New directions in theory and research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 11-28.Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, F. R., 2001. Mood and modality. Cambridge textbooks in linguistics. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez-Llantada, C., 2002. Designing new genre identities in scientific and technical discourse: Cognitive, social and pedagogical implications. Journal of English Studies. vol. 3, pp. 251-263.10.18172/jes.81Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Perkins, M., 1983. Modal expressions in English. London: Frances Pinter.Search in Google Scholar

Rus, D., 2014. Technical communication as strategic communication. Characteristics of the English technical discourse. Procedia Technology 12, pp. 654-658.10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.545Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. R., 1976. A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5, pp. 1-23.10.1017/S0047404500006837Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Sharpe, M., 2014. Language forms and rhetorical function in technical instructions. English for Specific Purposes World, vol. 15, no 43, pp. 1-9. www.esp/world.infoSearch in Google Scholar

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D., 1986. Relevance. Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Šipková, M., 2017. O modálních predikativech slovesného původu typu To přende, (se) patři…zbórat. Naše řeč, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 265-271.Search in Google Scholar

Tárnyiková, J., 2007. Sentence complexes in text. Processing strategies in English and in Czech. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci.Search in Google Scholar

Trimble, L., 1985. English for science and technology, a discourse approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Virtanen, T. and Halmari, H., 2005. Persuasion across genres. Emerging perspectives. In: H. Halmari and T. Virtanen, eds. Persuasion across genres. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 3-24.10.1075/pbns.130.03virSearch in Google Scholar

Vogel, R., 2018. Persuasion in business documents: Strategies for reporting positively on negative phenomena. Ostrava Journal of English Philology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 55-70.Search in Google Scholar