The meaning and development of the Hebrew scalar modifier kexol

Anderson, S.R., 1982. Where’s morphology? Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 571-612.Search in Google Scholar

Ariel, M., Elitzur D., Du Bois, J.W. and Linzen, T., 2015. Pronominal datives. The royal road to argument status. Studies in Language, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 257-321.10.1075/sl.39.2.01ariSearch in Google Scholar

Athanasiadou, A., 2007. On the subjectivity of intensifiers. Language Sciences, vol. 29, pp. 554-565.10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.009Search in Google Scholar

Bai, Y., 2014. A usage-based study of the just me construction. German Cognitive Linguistics Association, vol. 2, pp. 127-145.10.1515/gcla-2014-0009Search in Google Scholar

Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot, H., 2017. Between grammaticalization and constructionalization. Helkat Lashon, vol. 50, pp. 94-116. (in Hebrew)Search in Google Scholar

Beck, S., 1997. On the semantics of comparative conditionals. Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 229-271.10.1023/A:1005361901518Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Boas, H. C., 2013. Cognitive construction grammar. In: T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale, eds. The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 233-254.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0013Search in Google Scholar

Borsley, R., 2004. An approach to English comparative correlatives. In: S. Müller, ed. Proceedings of the fourth conference on head - driven phrase structure grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications.10.21248/hpsg.2004.4Search in Google Scholar

Boye, K. and Harder, P., 2014 (Inter)subjectification in a functional theory of grammaticalization. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 7-24.10.1080/03740463.2014.950073Search in Google Scholar

Budts, S. and Petré P., 2016. Reading the intentions of Be going to. On the subjectification of future markers. Folia Linguistica Historica, vol. 37, pp. 1-3210.1515/flih-2016-0001Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, J. L., 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511750526Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, J. L., 2013. Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In: T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale, eds. The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 49-69.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0004Search in Google Scholar

Choueka, Y., 1997. Rav-Milim. A comprehensive dictionary of modern Hebrew. Jerusalem: Center for educational technology, Miskal and Steimatzky.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, W. and Cruse, D. A., 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803864Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Culicover, P. and Jackendoff, R. S., 1999. The view from the periphery: The English comparative correlative. Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 30, pp. 543-571.10.1162/002438999554200Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Deppermann, A., 2011. Constructions vs. lexical items as sources of complex meanings. In: P. Auer and S. Pfänder, eds. Constructions: Emerging and emergent. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 88-126.10.1515/9783110229080.88Search in Google Scholar

Diewald, G., 2010. On some problem areas in grammaticalization studies. In: K. Stathi, E. Gehweiler and E. König, eds. Grammaticalization: Current views and issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 17-50.10.1075/slcs.119.04dieSearch in Google Scholar

Fanego, T., 2010. Paths in the development of elaborative discourse markers: Evidence from Spanish. In: K. Davidse, L.Vandelanotte and H.Cuyckens, eds. Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 197–237.10.1515/9783110226102.2.197Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, C. J., 1986. Varieties of conditional sentences. In: F. Marshall, A. Miller and Z.S. Zhang, eds. Proceedings of the third eastern states conference on linguistics. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University, pp. 163-182.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P. and O’Connor, M.C., 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 501-538.10.2307/414531Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fried, M., 2013. Principles of constructional change. In: T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale, eds. The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford: University Press, pp. 419-437.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0023Search in Google Scholar

Ghesquière, L. and Davidse, K., 2011. The development of intensification scales in noun-intensifying uses of adjectives: sources, path and mechanisms of change. English Language and Linguistics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 251-277.10.1017/S1360674311000037Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gisborne, N. and Patten, A., 2011. Construction grammar and grammaticalization. In: H. Narrog and B. Heine, eds. The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 92-104.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0008Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. E., 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. E., 2011. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. In: A. E. Goldberg, ed. Cognitive linguistics: Critical concepts in linguistics. London and New York: Routledge, vol. 3, pp. 30-42.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. E., 2013. Constructionist approaches. In: T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale, eds. The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 15-31.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0002Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. E. and van der Auwera, J., 2012. This is to count as a construction. Folia Linguistica, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 109-132.10.1515/flin.2012.4Search in Google Scholar

Gvura, A., 2000. Syntactic studies in the legal contract. Beer-Sheva: Ben Gurion University of the Negev Press. (in Hebrew).Search in Google Scholar

Gzella, H., 2006. Die Entstehung des Artikels im Semitischen: Eine ‘phönizische’ Perspektive. Journal of Semitic Studies, vol.51, pp. 1-18. Hilpert, M., 2014. Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1093/jss/fgi080Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, T., and Trousdale, G., 2013. Construction grammar: Introduction. In: T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale, eds. The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, Oxford: University Press, pp. 1-14.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, P. J., 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. In: E.C. Traugott and B. Heine, eds. Approaches to grammaticalization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, vol. 1, pp. 17-35.Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, R., 2013. Constructions in the parallel architecture. In: T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale, eds. The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford: University Press, pp. 70-92.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0005Search in Google Scholar

Kay, P., 2013. The limits of (construction) grammar. In: T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale, eds. The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford: University Press, pp. 32-48.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0003Search in Google Scholar

Kay, P. and Fillmore, C. J., 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistics generalizations: The ‘what’s X doing Y’ construction. Language, vol. 75, pp. 1-33.10.1353/lan.1999.0033Search in Google Scholar

Kay, P. and Michaelis, L.A., 2012. Constructional meaning and compositionality. In: C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger and P. Portner, eds. Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, vol.3. pp. 2271-2296.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, R. W., 1998. On subjectification and grammaticalization. In: J.P. Koenig, ed. Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap. Stanford: CSLI, pp. 71-87.Search in Google Scholar

Livnat, Z., 2006. Argumentation is scientific discourse: The use of concession. Helkat Lashon 37-38, pp. 75-84. (in Hebrew)Search in Google Scholar

Livnat, Z., 2010. Rhetoric of the scientific article. Language and the discourse community. Ramat Gan: Bar Ilan University Press. (in Hebrew)Search in Google Scholar

Malkin, R., 1976. The word “all” its meaning and opposites. In: M. Zahari, M. Zand and A. Tartakover, eds. Hagut Ivrit Bebrit Hamoatsot [Hebrew contemplation in the U.S.S.R.] Jerusalem: Biblos. pp. 36-42. (in Hebrew)Search in Google Scholar

Martin, J., 1992. English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.59Search in Google Scholar

Maschler, Y., 2018. From matrix clause to prototypical discourse marker: The construction (‘ani) lo yode’a/yoda’at ‘(I) dunno (M/F)’ from a pragmatic typological perspective. Leshoneno (‘Our Language’) 80 (1-2), pp. 137-166. (in Hebrew)Search in Google Scholar

McCawley, J. D., 1989. The comparative conditional constructions in English, German and Chinese. Proceedings of the 14th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 176-187.10.3765/bls.v14i0.1791Search in Google Scholar

Michaelis, L. A., 2004. Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 15, pp. 1-67.10.1515/cogl.2004.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Narrog, H., 2012. Modality, subjectivity and semantic change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694372.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Narrog, H., 2017. Three types of subjectivity, three types of intersubjectivity, their dynamicization and a synthesis. In: D. Van Olmen, H. Cuyckens and L. Ghesquière, eds. Aspects of grammaticalization, Berlin/Boston: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 19-46.10.1515/9783110492347-002Search in Google Scholar

Nir, B. and Berman, R. A., 2010. Parts of speech as constructions, the case of Hebrew ‘adverbs’. Constructions and Frames, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 242-274.10.1075/cf.2.2.05nirSearch in Google Scholar

Nuyts, J., 2001. Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 33, pp. 383-400.10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00009-6Search in Google Scholar

Pajusalu, R., 2008. Pragmatics of quantifiers: The case of Estonian kõik ‘all’. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 40, pp. 1950-1965.10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Panther, K.U. and Thornburg, L.L., 2009. From syntactic coordination to conceptual modification: The case of the nice and Adj construction. Constructions and Frames, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 58-86.10.1075/cf.1.1.04panSearch in Google Scholar

Paradis, C., 2000. Reinforcing adjectives: A cognitive semantic perspective on grammaticalization. In: R. Bermúdez-Otero, D. Denison, R. Hogg and C. McCully, eds. Generative theory and corpus studies: A dialogue from 10 ICEHL, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 233-58.10.1515/9783110814699.233Search in Google Scholar

Peretz, Y., 1967. The relative clause. Tel-Aviv: Dvir. (in Hebrew)Search in Google Scholar

Polak-Yitzhaki, H. and Maschler, Y., 2016. Disclaiming understanding? Hebrew ani lo mevin/a (‘I don’t understand’) in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 106, pp. 163-183.10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.013Search in Google Scholar

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J., 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London/New-York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Rickford J. R., Wasow, T., Zwiky, A. and Buchstaller, I., 2007. Intensive and quotative ALL: Something old something new. American Speech, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 3-31.10.1215/00031283-2007-001Search in Google Scholar

Schwenter, S.A. and Traugott, E.S., 2000. Invoking scalarity. The development of in fact. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7-25.10.1075/jhp.1.1.04schSearch in Google Scholar

Sullivan, K., 2011. If and when it’s a construction … Constructions and Frames, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 236-260.10.1075/cf.3.2.04sulSearch in Google Scholar

Traugott E. C., 2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. In: R. Hickey, ed. Motives for language change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 124-139.10.1017/CBO9780511486937.009Search in Google Scholar

Traugott E. C., 2008. Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In: R. Eckardt, G. Jager and T. Veenstra, eds. Variation, selection, development-probing the evolutionary model of language change. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 219-250.10.1515/9783110205398.3.219Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, E.C., 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In: K. Davidse, L. Vandelotte and H. Cuyckens, eds. Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 29-71.10.1515/9783110226102.1.29Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, E.C. and Trousdale, G., 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ziv, Y., 2001. Pashut: discourse markers in Spoken Hebrew. Hebrew Linguistics, vol. 48, pp. 17-29. (in Hebrew)Search in Google Scholar

Ziv, Y., 2006. Naxon and ma: Codification of givenness and surprise in the processing of information. In: A. Maman and S. Fassberg, eds. Studies in Language, vol. 10, pp. 65-73. (in Hebrew)Search in Google Scholar

Ziv, Y., (n.d.) Existentials: Modern Hebrew. In: G. Khan, ed. Encyclopedia of Hebrew language and linguistics, Brill. [Accessed 1 December 2017]. Available at: http://referenceworks.brillonline.com.Search in Google Scholar

Zusman, O., 2016. Concession. Helkat Lashon, vol. 49, pp. 52-74. (in Hebrew)Search in Google Scholar