The ‘indisciplinarity’ of stylistics

ARISTOTE, 2007. Rhétorique. Présentation et traduction par Pierre Chiron. Paris : Flammarion.Search in Google Scholar

AUER, P. ed., 2007. Style and social identities. Alternative approaches to linguistic heterogeneity. Berlin, New York : Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

BAILLARGEON, N., 2010. The practice of intellectual self-defense in the university. In J. Bricmont and J. Franck, eds. Chomsky Notebook. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 283-292.10.7312/bric14474-014Search in Google Scholar

BIBER, D. and CONRAD, S., 2009. Register, genre and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511814358Search in Google Scholar

BURKE, M., 2011. Literary reading, cognition and emotion. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203840306Search in Google Scholar

COUPLAND, N., 2001. Language, situation and the relational self: Theorising dialect style in sociolinguistics. In P. Eckert and J. R. Rickford, eds. Style and sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 185-210.10.1017/CBO9780511613258.012Search in Google Scholar

COUPLAND, N., 2007. Style. language variation and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511755064Search in Google Scholar

ECKERT, P. and RICKFORD, J. eds., 2001. Style and sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613258Search in Google Scholar

FOUCAULT, M., 1979. L’Ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar

GEE, J. P., 2008. Social linguistics and literacies. London, New York: Routledge, 3rd ed.10.4324/9780203944806Search in Google Scholar

GOATLY, A., 2007. Washing the brain. Metaphor and hidden ideology. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/dapsac.23Search in Google Scholar

HUDSON, R., 2004. Why education needs linguistics (and vice versa). Journal of Linguistics, vol. 40, no.1, pp. 105-130.10.1017/S0022226703002342Search in Google Scholar

IRVINE, J. T., 2001. Style as distinctiveness: the culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In: P. Eckert and J. R. Rockford, eds. Style and sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.10.1017/CBO9780511613258.002Search in Google Scholar

JEFFRIES, L., 2010. Critical stylistics. The power of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-04516-4Search in Google Scholar

LECERCLE, J-J., 1993. The current state of stylistics. The European English Messenger, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 14-18.Search in Google Scholar

LOTY, L., 2005. Pour l'indisciplinarité. In: J. V. Douthwaite and M. Vidal Mary, eds. The interdisciplinary century: Tensions and convergences in eighteen-century art, history and literature. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, pp. 245-259.Search in Google Scholar

MILLER, C. R., 1994. Genre as social action. In: A. Freedman and P. Medway, eds. Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 23-42.Search in Google Scholar

SIMPSON, P., 2014. Stylistics. London: Routledge, 2nd ed.Search in Google Scholar

SORLIN, S., 2014. La Stylistique anglaise. Théories & Pratiques. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Search in Google Scholar

STOCKWELL, P., 2002. Cognitive poetics. An introduction. London, New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

TOOLAN, M., 1996. Total speech. An integrational linguistic approach to language. Durham & London: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822379843Search in Google Scholar

TOOLAN, M., 2009. Language teaching. Integrational linguistic approaches. London, New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

WATSON, G. and Zyngier S., 2007. Literature and stylistics for language learners. Theory and practice. Foreword by Ronald Carter. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230624856Search in Google Scholar

WEBER, J-J., 1996. The stylistics reader: From Roman Jakobson to the present. London: Arnold. Search in Google Scholar