The Middle English Creolization Hypothesis: Persistence, Implications, and Language Ideology

Allen, Cynthia. 1997. Middle English case loss and the ‘creolization’ hypothesis. English Language and Linguistics 1.1. 63–89. DOI: 10.1017/S136067430000036810.1017/S1360674300000368Search in Google Scholar

Bailey, Charles James & Karl Maroldt. 1977. The French lineage of English. In Jürgen Meisel (ed.), Langues en contact: Pidgins, creoles, Tübingen: TBL. 21–53.Search in Google Scholar

Bech, Kristin & George Walkden. 2016. English is (still) a West Germanic language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39.1. 65–100. DOI: 10.1017/S033258651500021910.1017/S0332586515000219Search in Google Scholar

Christiansen, Morten H. & Nick Chater. 2009. The myth of language universals and the myth of universal grammar. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32.5. 452–453. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X0999064110.1017/S0140525X09990641Search in Google Scholar

Crystal, David. 1997. English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO978051148699910.1017/CBO9780511486999Search in Google Scholar

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 1995. Middle English is a creole and its opposite: On the value of plausible speculation. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Linguistic change under contact conditions, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 35–50. DOI: 10.1515/9783110885170.3510.1515/9783110885170.35Search in Google Scholar

Danchev, Andrei. 1997. The Middle English creolization hypothesis revisited. In Jacek Fisiak, (ed.), Studies in Middle English linguistics, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 79–108. DOI: 10.1515/9783110814194.7910.1515/9783110814194.79Search in Google Scholar

DeGraff, Michel. 2003. Against creole exceptionalism. Language 79.2. 391–410.10.1353/lan.2003.0114Search in Google Scholar

Domingue, N. Z. 1977. Middle English: Another creole? Journal of Creole Studies 1. 89–100.Search in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2015. What exactly is Universal Grammar, and has anyone seen it? Frontiers in Psychology 6:852. 1–17. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.0085210.3389/fpsyg.2015.00852Search in Google Scholar

Emonds, Joseph E. & Jan Terje Faarlund. 2014. English: The language of the Vikings. Olomouc: Palacký University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas & Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32.5. 429–448. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X0999094X10.1017/S0140525X0999094XSearch in Google Scholar

Görlach, Manfred. 1986. Middle English – a creole? In Dieter Kastovsky & Aleksander Szwedek (eds.), Linguistics across historical and geographical boundaries, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 329–344.Search in Google Scholar

Hartman, Megan E. 2016. New applications for word-foot theory. In M. J. Toswell & Lindy Brady (eds.), Early English poetic culture and meter: The influence of G. R. Russom, Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications. 73–92.10.2307/j.ctvvnccj.9Search in Google Scholar

Hock, Hans Henrich & Brian D. Joseph. 1996. Language history, language change, and language relationship: An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.Search in Google Scholar

Hogg, Richard M. 1997. Some remarks on case marking in Old English. Transactions of the Philological Society 95.1. 95–109. DOI: 10.1111/1467-968X.0001410.1111/1467-968X.00014Search in Google Scholar

Ingham, Richard. 2014. The maintenance of French in later medieval England. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 115.4. 425–448.Search in Google Scholar

Lightfoot, David W. 2016. Review of Joseph E. Emonds & Jan Terje Faarlund, English: The language of the Vikings, 2014. In Language 92.2. 474–477.10.1353/lan.2016.0037Search in Google Scholar

Markey, Thomas L. 1982. Afrikaans: Creole or non-creole? Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, 49.2. 169–207.Search in Google Scholar

McWhorter, John H. 2005. Defining creole. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

McWhorter, John H. 2008. Our magnificent bastard tongue: The untold history of English. New York. NY: Gotham Books.Search in Google Scholar

Milroy, James. 2001a. Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5.4. 530–555. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9481.0016310.1111/1467-9481.00163Search in Google Scholar

Milroy, James. 2001b. Response to Sally Johnson: Misunderstanding language? Journal of Sociolinguistics 5(4). 620–625. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9481.0017010.1111/1467-9481.00170Search in Google Scholar

O’Neil, David. 2017. A syntactic basis for the distribution of metrical types in Beowulf. The Mediaeval Journal 7.1.29–59. DOI: 10.1484/J.TMJ.5.11534610.1484/J.TMJ.5.115346Search in Google Scholar

O’Neil, David. 2018. English as the lingua franca of international publishing. World Englishes 37.2. 146–165. DOI: 10.1111/weng.1229310.1111/weng.12293Search in Google Scholar

O’Neil, David. 2020, forthcoming. Syntax, prosody, and the Brut: Metrical continuity in the early English alliterative tradition. Enarratio 23.10.18061/1811/101759Search in Google Scholar

Plag, Ingo. 1998. Review of Christiane Dalton-Puffer, The French influence on Middle English morphology: A corpus-based study of derivation, 1996. In Language 74.2. 392–395.10.1353/lan.1998.0260Search in Google Scholar

Phillipson, Robert. 1992. Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Poussa, Patricia. 1982. The evolution of early standard English: The creolization hypothesis. Studia Anglia Posnaniensia 14. 69–85.Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian. 2016. Introduction. In Ian Roberts (ed.), The Oxford handbook of Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199573776.013.110.1093/oxfordhb/9780199573776.013.1Search in Google Scholar

Russom, Geoffrey R. 2017. The evolution of verse structure in Old and Middle English poetry: From the earliest alliterative poems to iambic pentameter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/978131656292510.1017/9781316562925Search in Google Scholar

Siegel, Jeff. 2001. Koine formation and creole genesis. In Norval Smith & Tonjes Veenstra (eds.), Creolization and contact, Amsterdam: Benjamins.175–197. DOI: 10.1075/cll.23.08sie10.1075/cll.23.08sieSearch in Google Scholar

Stenbrenden, Gjertrud F. 2016. Why English is not dead: A rejoinder to Emonds and Faarlund. Folia Linguistica Historica 37.1. 239–279. DOI: 10.1515/flih-2016-000810.1515/flih-2016-0008Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2009. Universal grammar is dead. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32.5. 470–71. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X0999074410.1017/S0140525X09990744Search in Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah Grey & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520912793Search in Google Scholar

Townend, Matthew. 2002. Language and history in Viking Age England: Linguistic relations between speakers of Old Norse and Old English. Turnhout: Brepols.10.1484/M.SEM-EB.5.106296Search in Google Scholar

Trotter, David M. 2017. Middle English creolization. In Laurel J. Brinton & Alexander Bergs (eds.), Middle English, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 224–238. DOI: 10.1515/9783110525328-01210.1515/9783110525328-012Search in Google Scholar

Watts, Richard J. 2011. Language myths and the history of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195327601.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780195327601.001.0001Search in Google Scholar