Wilt Thou Be Lord of all the World? Modals and Persuasion in Shakespeare

Arnovick, Leslie Catherine. 1999. Diachronic pragmatics: Seven case studies in English illocutionary development (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 68). Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.68Search in Google Scholar

Austin, John Langshaw. 1962. How to do things with words: The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford, etc.: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Boden, Stefanie. 2004. Persuasive dialogues in Shakespeare’s dramatic work. Jena: Friedrich- Schiller-Universität Jena dissertation. http://www.db-thueringen.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-3108/Boden.pdf. (7 March 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman. 1989. Politeness theory and Shakespeare’s four major tragedies. Language in Society 18. 159-212.10.1017/S0047404500013464Search in Google Scholar

Busse, Ulrich. 2008. An inventory of directives in Shakespeare’s King Lear. In: Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Speech acts in the history of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176), 85-114. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.176.06busSearch in Google Scholar

Cialdini, Robert B. 2009. Influence: Science and practice. 5th edn. Boston, MA, etc.: Pearson Education.Search in Google Scholar

Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The semantics of the modal auxiliaries (Croom Helm Linguistics Series). London, Sydney & Dover, NH: Croom Helm.Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan & Dawn Archer. 2008. Requests and directness in Early Modern English trial proceedings and play texts, 1640-1760. In: Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Speech acts in the history of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176), 45-84. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.176.05culSearch in Google Scholar

Evans, Gwyne Blakemore (general editor). 1997. The Riverside Shakespeare, 2nd edn. Boston, MA & New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Search in Google Scholar

Fraser, Bruce. 1975. Hedged performatives. In: Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts, 187-210. San Diego, CA, etc.: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_008Search in Google Scholar

Gilbert, Anthony. 1997. Techniques of persuasion in Julius Caesar and Othello. Neophilologus 61. 309-323.10.1023/A:1004251202026Search in Google Scholar

Jacobs, Andreas & Andreas H. Jucker. 1995. The historical perspective in pragmatics. In: Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical pragmatics: Pragmatic developments in the history of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 35), 3-33. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.35.04jacSearch in Google Scholar

Jucker, Andreas H. 1997. Persuasion by inference: Analysis of a party political broadcast. In: J. Blommaert & C. Bulcaen (eds.), Political linguistics (Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11), 121-137.Search in Google Scholar

Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.). 2008. Speech acts in the history of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176). Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.176Search in Google Scholar

Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.). 2010. Historical pragmatics (Handbooks of Pragmatics 8). Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1515/9783110214284Search in Google Scholar

Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen. 2013. English historical pragmatics (Edinburgh Textbooks on the English Language). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748644704Search in Google Scholar

Kohnen, Thomas. 2004. Methodological problems in corpus-based historical pragmatics: The case of English directives. In: Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg (eds.), Language and computers. Advances in corpus linguistics: Papers from the 23rd International Con ference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 23), Göteborg 22-26 May 2002, 237-242. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Search in Google Scholar

Kohnen, Thomas. 2009. Historical corpus pragmatics: Focus on speech acts and texts. In: Andreas H. Jucker, Daniel Schreier & Marianne Hundt (eds.), Corpora: Pragmatics and discourse. Papers from the 29th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 29) (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 68), 13-36. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi.Search in Google Scholar

Kopytko, Roman. 1993. Polite discourse in Shakespeare’s English. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu.Search in Google Scholar

Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. 2 vols. Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nakayasu, Minako. 2009. The pragmatics of modals in Shakespeare (Polish Studies in English language and literature 30). Frankfurt am Main, etc.: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Nakayasu, Minako. 2013. Modals, speech acts and (im)politeness: Interactions in Shakespeare’s plays. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 48(4). 5-33.Search in Google Scholar

Oakeshott-Taylor, John. 1984. Factuality, tense, intonation and perspective: Some thoughts on the semantics of ‘think’. Lingua 62. 289-317.Search in Google Scholar

O’Keefe, Daniel J. 2002. Persuasion: Theory and research, 2nd edn. (Current Communication: An Advanced Text Series 2). Thousand Oaks, CA, London & New Delhi: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Pakkala-Weckström, Mari. 2001. Prudence and the power of persuasion: Language and maistrie in The tale of Melibee. The Chaucer Review 35. 399-412.10.1353/cr.2001.0006Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, Frank Robert. 2001. Mood and modality, 2nd edn. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Salmi-Tolonen, Tarja. 2005. Persuasion in judicial argumentation: The opinions of the advocates general at the European Court of Justice. In: Helena Halmari & Tuija Virtanen (eds.), Persuasion across genres: A linguistic approach (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 130), 59-101. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.130.06salSearch in Google Scholar

Searle, John Rogers. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438Search in Google Scholar

Simons, Herbert W. & Jean G. Jones. 2011. Persuasion in society, 2nd edn. New York & London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Spevack, Marvin (ed.). 1968-1980. A complete and systematic concordance to the works of Shakespeare. 9 vols. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 54). Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620904Search in Google Scholar

Taavitsainen, Irma. 2012. New perspectives, theories, and methods: Historical pragmatics. In: Alexander Bergs & Laurel J. Brinton (eds.), English Historical Linguistics: An international handbook, vol. 2 (Handbooks for Linguistics and Communication Science, 34.2), 1457-1474. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1972. A history of English syntax: A transformational approach to the history of English sentence structure (The Transatlantic Series in Linguistics). New York: Holt, Reinehart and Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65. 31-55.10.2307/414841Search in Google Scholar

Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2001. Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 1505-1528. Vickers, Brian. 1983. ‘The power of persuasion’: Images of the orator, Elyot to Shakespeare. In: James J. Murphy (ed.), Renaissance eloquence: Studies and practice of renaissance rhetoric, 411-435. Berkeley, CA, Los Angeles, CA & London: University of California Press.10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00029-7Search in Google Scholar

Walton, Douglas. 2007. Media argumentation: Dialectic, persuasion, and rhetoric. Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511619311Search in Google Scholar

Yoshikawa, Fumiko. 2011. Mapping of rhetorical strategies related to persuasion in Middle English religious prose. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Middle English (ICOME 7), Ivan Franko National University, Lviv, Ukraine. Search in Google Scholar