Multiple Parallel Ordinations: the Importance of Choice of Ordination Method and Weighting of Species Abundance Data

Austin, M.P. & Greig-Smith, P. 1968. The application of quantitative methods to vegetation survey: II. Some methodological problems of data from rain forest. J. Ecol 56: 827-844.10.2307/2258109Search in Google Scholar

Beals, E.W. 1973. Ordination: Mathematical elegance and ecological naivete. J. Ecol. 61: 23-35.10.2307/2258914Search in Google Scholar

Bratli, H., Økland, T., , Økland, R.H., Dramstad, W.E., Elven, R., Engan, G., Fjellstad, W., Heegaard, E., Pedersen, O. & Solstad, H. 2006. Patterns of variation in vascular plant species richness and composition in SE Norwegian agricultural landscapes. Agric. Ecosyst. & Environ. 114: 270-286.10.1016/j.agee.2005.10.022Search in Google Scholar

Brown, J.H. 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am. Nat. 124: 255-279.10.1086/284267Search in Google Scholar

Buckley, H.L. & Freckleton, R.P. 2010. Understanding the role of species dynamics in abundanceoccupancy relationships. J Ecol. 98: 645-658.10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01650.xSearch in Google Scholar

Cao, Y. & Epifanio, J. 2010. Quantifying the responses of macroinvertebrate assemblages to simulated stress: are more accurate similarity indices less useful? Meth. Ecol. Evol. 1: 380-388.10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00040.xSearch in Google Scholar

Clarke, K. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aus. J. Ecol. 18: 117-143.10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00438.xSearch in Google Scholar

Clymo, R. 1980. Preliminary survey of the peat-bog Hummell Knowe Moss using various numerical methods. Vegetatio 42: 129-148.10.1007/978-94-009-9197-2_17Search in Google Scholar

Collins, S. L., Glenn, S.M. & Roberts, D.W. 1993. The hierarchical continuum concept. J. Veg. Sci. 4: 149-156.10.2307/3236099Search in Google Scholar

De’ath, G. 1999. Extended dissimilarity: a method of robust estimation of ecological distances from high beta diversity data. Pl. Ecol. 144: 191-199.Search in Google Scholar

Eilertsen, O., Økland, R.H., Økland, T. & Pedersen, O. 1990. Data manipulation and gradient length estimation in DCA ordination. J. Veg. Sci. 1: 261-270.10.2307/3235663Search in Google Scholar

Ellingsen, K.E. & Gray, J.S. 2002. Spatial patterns of benthic diversity: is there a latitudinal gradient along the Norwegian continental shelf? J. Anim. Ecol. 71: 373-389.10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00606.xSearch in Google Scholar

Ellingsen, K.E., Hewitt, J.E. & Thrush, S.F. 2007. Rare species, habitat diversity and functional redundancy in marine benthos. J. Sea Res. 58: 291-301.Search in Google Scholar

Faith, D.P., Minchin, P.R. & Belbin, L. 1987. Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetatio 69: 57-68.10.1007/978-94-009-4061-1_6Search in Google Scholar

Gauch, H.G., Jr. 1982. Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511623332Search in Google Scholar

Gauch, H.G., Jr. 1973a. A quantitative evaluation of the Bray-Curtis ordination. Ecology 54: 829-836.10.2307/1935677Search in Google Scholar

Gauch, H.G., Jr. 1973b. The relationship between sample similarity and ecological distance. - Ecology 54: 618-622.10.2307/1935348Search in Google Scholar

Goodall, D.W. 1954. Vegetational classification and vegetational continua. Festschr. Aichinger 1: 168-182.Search in Google Scholar

Gogina, M., Glockzin, M. & Zettler M.L. 2010. Distribution of benthic macrofaunal communities in the western Baltic Sea with regard to near-bottom environmental parameters. 1. Causal analysis. J. Mar. Syst. 79: 112-123.10.1016/j.jmarsys.2009.07.006Search in Google Scholar

Halvorsen, R. 2012. A gradient analytic perspective on distribution modeling. Sommerfeltia 35: 1-165.10.2478/v10208-011-0015-3Search in Google Scholar

Hanski, I. 1982. Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis. Oikos 38: 210.10.2307/3544021Search in Google Scholar

Heino, J., Muotka, T., Mykrä, H., Paavola, R., Hämäläinen, H. & Koskenniemi, E. 2003. Defining macroinvertebrate assemblage types of headwater streams: Implications for bioassessment and conservations. Ecol. App. 13: 842-852.10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0842:DMATOH]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

Hill, M.O. 1973. Reciprocal averaging: An eigenvector method for ordination. J. Ecol. 61: 237-249.10.2307/2258931Search in Google Scholar

Hill, M. O. 1979. DECORANA - A FORTRAN program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Ithaca.Search in Google Scholar

Hill, M.O., Bell, N., Bruggeman-Nannenga, M.A., Brugués, M., Cano, M.J., Enroth, J., Flatberg, K.I., Frahm, J.P., Gallego, M.T., Garilleti, R., Guerra, J., Hedenäs, L., Holyoak, D.T., Hyvönen, J., Ignatov, M.S., Lara, F., Mazimpaka, V., Muñoz, J. & Söderström, L. 2006. An annotated checklist of the mosses of Europe and Macaronesia. J. Bryol. 28: 198-267.10.1179/174328206X119998Search in Google Scholar

Hill, M.O. & Gauch, H.G. Jr. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42: 47-58.10.1007/978-94-009-9197-2_7Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, D.A. 1993. Multivariate analysis of benthic invertebrate communities: the implication of choosing particular data standardizations, measures of association, and ordination methods. Hydrobiologia 268: 9-26.10.1007/BF00005737Search in Google Scholar

Kenkel, N.C. 2006. On selecting an appropriate multivariate analysis. Canadian Journal of Pl. Sci. 86: 663-676.10.4141/P05-164Search in Google Scholar

Krog, H., Østhagen, H. & Tønsberg, T. 1994. Lavflora. Norske busk- og bladlav. Ny revidert utgave ved Hildur Krog og Tor Tønsberg, ed. 2. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.Search in Google Scholar

Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. 1998. Numerical ecology, 2nd Edition. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar

Lengyel, A., Csiky, J. & Botta-Dukát, Z. 2012. How do locally infrequent species influence numerical classification? A simulation study. Comm. Ecol. 13: 64-71.10.1556/ComEc.13.2012.1.8Search in Google Scholar

Lid, J. & Lid, D.T. 2005. Norsk flora. 7 utgåve ved R. Elven. Det Norske Samlaget, Oslo.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, H., Økland, T., Halvorsen, R., Gao, J., Liu, Q., Eilertsen, O. & Bratli, H. 2008. Gradient analyses of forests ground vegetation and its relationships to environmental variables in five subtropical forest areas, S and SW China. Sommerfeltia 32: 1-196.10.2478/v10208-011-0012-6Search in Google Scholar

Lundblad, E.R., Wright, D.J., Miller, J., Larkin, E.M., Rinehart, R., Naar, D.F., Donahue, D.T., Anderson, S.M. & Battista, T. 2006. A Benthic Terrain Classification Scheme for American Samoa.10.1080/01490410600738021Search in Google Scholar

Mar. Geod. 29: 89-111. van der Maarel, E. 1979. Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity. Vegetatio 39: 97-114. van der Maarel, E. 1982. On the manipulation and editing of phytosociological and ecological data. Vegetatio 50: 71-76.Search in Google Scholar

Mahecha, M.D., Martínez, A., Lischeid, G. & Beck, E. 2007. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction: Alternative ordination approaches for extracting and visualizing biodiversity patterns in tropical montane forest vegetation data. Ecol. Inf. 2: 138-149.10.1016/j.ecoinf.2007.05.002Search in Google Scholar

Minchin, P.R. 1987. An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio 69:89-107.10.1007/BF00038690Search in Google Scholar

Noy-Meir, I., Walker, D. & Williams, W.T. 1975. Data Transformations in Ecological Ordination: II. On the Meaning of Data Standardization. J. Ecol. 63: 779-800.10.2307/2258601Search in Google Scholar

Økland, R.H. 1986a. Rescaling of ecological gradients. I. Calculation of ecological distance between vegetation stands by means of their floristic composition. Nord. J. Bot. 6: 651-660.10.1111/j.1756-1051.1986.tb00464.xSearch in Google Scholar

Økland, R.H. 1986b. Reseating of ecological gradients. II. The effect of scale on symmetry of species response curves. Nord. J. Bot. 6: 661-670.10.1111/j.1756-1051.1986.tb00465.xSearch in Google Scholar

Økland, R.H. 1990a. Vegetation ecology: theory, methods and applications with reference to Fennoscandia. Sommerfeltia 1:1-233.Search in Google Scholar

Økland, R.H. 1990b. A phytoecological study of the mire Northern Kisselbergmosen, SE Norway. II. Identification of gradients by detrended (canonical) correspondence analysis. Nord. J. Bot. 10:79-108.Search in Google Scholar

Økland, R.H. 1996. Are ordination and constrained ordination alternative or complementary strategies in general ecological studies? J. Veg. Sci. 7: 289-292.10.2307/3236330Search in Google Scholar

Økland, R.H. & Eilertsen, O. 1993. Vegetation-environment relationships of boreal coniferous forests in the Solhomfjell area, Gjerstad, S Norway. Sommerfeltia 16:1-254.10.2478/som-1993-0002Search in Google Scholar

Økland, R.H., Eilertsen, O. & Økland, T. 1990. On the relationship between sample plot size and beta diversity in boreal coniferous forests. Vegetatio 87:187-192.10.1007/BF00042954Search in Google Scholar

Økland, R. H., Økland, T. & Rydgren, K. 2001. Vegetation-environment relationships of boreal spruce swamp forests in Østmarka Nature Reserve, SE Norway. Sommerfeltia 29:1-190.10.2478/som-2001-0001Search in Google Scholar

Økland, T. 1996. Vegetation-Environment relationships of boreal spruce forests in ten monitoring reference areas in Norway. Sommerfeltia 22:1-349.10.2478/som-1996-0001Search in Google Scholar

Økland, T., Rydgren, K., Økland, R.H., Storaunet, K.O. & Rolstad, V. 2003. Variation in environmental conditions, understorey species richness, abundance and composition among natural and managed Picea abies forest stands. For. Ecol. Man 177: 17-37.Search in Google Scholar

Oksanen, J. 1988. A note on the occasional instability of detrending in correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 74: 29-32.10.1007/BF00045610Search in Google Scholar

Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F.G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., O’Hara, R.B., Simpson, G.L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M.H.H. & Wagner, H. 2012. Community ecology package, “vegan” version 2.0-4.Search in Google Scholar

Olsgard, F. 1993. Do toxic algal blooms affect subtidal soft-bottom communities? Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 102: 269-286.10.3354/meps102269Search in Google Scholar

Olsgard, F. & Gray, J.S. 1995. A comprehensive analysis of the effects of offshore oil and gas exploration and production on the benthic communities of the Norwegian continental shelf. Marine Ecology Progress Series 122: 277-306.10.3354/meps122277Search in Google Scholar

Olsgard, F., Somerfield, P. & Carr, M. 1997. Relationships between taxonomic resolution and data transformations in analyses of a macrobenthic community along an established pollution gradient. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 149: 173-181.10.3354/meps149173Search in Google Scholar

Orlóci, L. 1978. Multivariate analysis in vegetation research. Second ed. Junk, The Hague. Palmer, M.W. 1993. Putting things in even better order: The advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 74:2215-2230.Search in Google Scholar

Peet, R.K., Knox, R.G., Case, J.S. & Allen, R.B. 1988. Putting things in order: The advantages of detrended correspondence analysis. Am Nat 131: 924-934.10.1086/284833Search in Google Scholar

Podani, J. 1989. Comparison of ordinations and classifications of vegetation data. Vegetatio 83:11-128.10.1007/BF00031684Search in Google Scholar

Raunkiær, C. 1918. Recherches statistiques sur les formations végétales. Biologiske meddelelser udgivne af Det kongelige danske videnskabernes selskab 1:1-80. R Development Core Team. 2012. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Search in Google Scholar

Rydgren, K. 1993. Herb-rich spruce forests in W Nordland, N Norway: an ecological and methodological study. Nord. J. Bot. 13: 667-690.Search in Google Scholar

Smartt, P.F.M., Meacock, S.E. & Lambert, J.M. 1974. Investigations into the properties of quantitative vegetational data: I. Pilot study. J.Ecol. 62: 735-759.10.2307/2258953Search in Google Scholar

Swan, J.M.A. 1970. An examination of some ordination problems by use of simulated vegetational data. Ecology. 51: 89-102.10.2307/1933602Search in Google Scholar

Thorne, R.S.J., Williams, W.P. & Cao, Y. 1999. The influence of data transformations on biological monitoring studies using macroinvertebrates. Water Res. 33: 343-350.10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00247-4Search in Google Scholar

Wartenberg, D., Ferson, S. & Rohlf, F.J. 1987. Putting things in order: A critique of detrended correspondence analysis. Am Nat 129: 434-448.10.1086/284647Search in Google Scholar

Whittaker, R.H. 1956. Vegetation of the Great Smokey Mountains. Ecol. Monogr. 26: 1-80.10.2307/1943577Search in Google Scholar

Whittaker, R.H. 1967. Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biol. Rev. 42: 207-264.10.1111/j.1469-185X.1967.tb01419.x4859903Search in Google Scholar

Wildi, O. 1980. Management and multivariate analysis of large data sets in vegetation research. Vegetatio 42: 175-180.10.1007/978-94-009-9197-2_21Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, J.B. 2012. Species presence/abundance sometimes represents a plant community as well as species abundances do, or better. J. Veg. Sci. 23: 1013-1023.Search in Google Scholar

Wright, I.A N.A., Chessman, B.C., Fairweather, P.G. & Benson L.E.E.J. 1995. Measuring the impact of sewage effluent on the macroinvertebrate community of an upland stream: the effect of different levels of taxonomic resolution and quantification. Aus. J. Ecol. 20: 142-149. 10.1111/j.1442-9993.1995.tb00528.xSearch in Google Scholar