[Barwise, J., & Cooper, R. (1981). Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4(1), 159–219.10.1007/BF00350139]Search in Google Scholar
[Barwise, J., & Perry, J. (1983). Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Berman, S. R. (1987). Situation-based semantics for adverbs of quantification. In J. Blevins, & A. Vainikka (Eds.), Studies in Semantics (pp. 46–68). U. Mass Occasional Papers in Linguistics 12, Amherst: University of Massachusetts.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bezuidenhout, A. (1997). Pragmatics, semantic underdetermination and the referential/attributivedistinction. Mind, 106, 375–409.10.1093/mind/106.423.375]Search in Google Scholar
[Borg, E. (2001). Deferred demonstratives. In J. K. Campbell, M. O’Rourke, & D. Shier (Eds.), Meaning and Truth. Investigations in Philosophical Semantics (pp. 214–230). New York & London: Seven Bridges Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borg, E. (2002). Pointing at Jack, talking about Jill: Understanding deferred uses of demonstratives and pronouns. Mind and Language, 17, 489–512.10.1111/1468-0017.00209]Search in Google Scholar
[Cann, R., Kempson, R., & Marten, L. (2005). The Dynamics of Language. Oxford: Elsevier.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carlson, G. N. (1977). A unified analysis of the English bare plural. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1(3), 413–456.10.1007/BF00353456]Search in Google Scholar
[Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470754603]Search in Google Scholar
[Casati, R., & Varzi, A. C. (1999). Parts and Places: The Structures of Spatial Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing. In Chafe & Nichols (1986), pp. 261–272.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chafe, W. & Nichols, J. (Eds), Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.]Search in Google Scholar
[Davidson, D. (1969). The individuation of events. In N. Rescher (Ed.), Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel (pp. 216–234). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Deigan, M. (2017). Counterfactual Double Lives. In Proceedings of the 21st Amsterdam Colloquium. https://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/jZiM2FhZ/AC2017-Proceedings.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Ehlich, K. (1982). Anaphora and deixis: Same, similar or different? In R. J. Jarvella, & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, Place and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics (pp. 315–38). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Elbourne, P. (2005). Situations and Individuals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Elbourne, P. (2008). Demonstratives as individual concepts. Linguistics and Philosophy, 31, 409–466.10.1007/s10988-008-9043-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Elbourne, P. (2013). Definite Descriptions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660193.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[von Fintel, K. (2004). A minimal theory of adverbial quantification. In H. Kamp, & B. Partee (Eds.), Context-Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning (pp. 137–175). Amsterdam: Elsevier.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frege, G. (1892). Über Sinn und Bedeutung (On Sense and Reference). Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik, 100, 25–50; transl. in Philosophical Review, 57, 207–230.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frege, G. (1897). Logik (Logic). Unpublished; transl. in H. Hermes, F. Kambartel, & F. Kaulbach (Eds.), Posthumous Writings (pp. 126–151). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frege, G. (1918). Der Gedanke. Eine Logische Untersuchung (Thoughts: A Logical Enquiry). Beiträge zur Philosophie des Deutschen Idealismus, I, 58–77; transl. in P. Geach (Ed.), Logical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell, 1977, pp. 1–30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Galery, T. (2008). Singular content and deferred uses of indexicals. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 20, 157–194.]Search in Google Scholar
[Galery, T. (2012). Descriptive Pronouns Revisited. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Identification Based Descriptive Interpretations. Ph.D. thesis. University College London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Galery, T. (2016). Deferred pronouns: A sketch based on Relevance Theory and Dynamic Syntax. In P. Grosz, & P. Patel-Grosz (Eds.), The Impact of Pronominal Form on Interpretation (pp. 287–315). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In D. Davidson, & G. Harman (Eds), The Logic of Grammar (pp. 64–75). Encino, CA: Dickenson Publishing Co.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heim, I. (1988). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. New York: Garland Publishing Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heim, I. (1990). E–type pronouns and donkey anaphora, Linguistics and Philosophy, 13(2), 137–178.10.1007/BF00630732]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaszczolt, K. (1999). Discourse, beliefs and intentions. Oxford: Elsevier.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kamp, H. (1981). A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. A. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Formal methods in the study of language (pp. 277–322). Dordrecht: Foris.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaplan, D. (1989). Demonstratives. In J. Almog, J. Perry, & H. Wettstein (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan (pp. 481–563). New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kempson, R., Meyer-Viol, W., & Gabbay, D. (2001). Dynamic Syntax: The Flow of Language Understanding. Wiley-Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kijania-Placek, K. (2000). Prawda i konsensus. Logiczne podstawy konsensualnego kryterium prawdy [Truth and consensus. A logical analysis of the consensus criterion of truth; in Polish]. Kraków: Jagiellonian University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kijania-Placek, K. (2009). Anaforyczna interpretacja deskryptywnych użyć wyrażeń okazjonalnych [Anaphoric interpretation of descriptive indexicals; in Polish]. Filozofia Nauki, 1(65), 31–39.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kijania-Placek, K. (2012). Pochwała okazjonalności: analiza deskryptywnych użyć wyrażeń okazjonalnych [Praise of indexicality. An analysis of descriptive uses of indexicals, in Polish]. Warsaw: Semper.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kijania-Placek, K. (2014). Situation semantics, time and descriptive indexicals. In P. Stalmaszczyk (Ed.), Semantics and beyond. Philosophical and linguistic inquiries (pp. 127–148.). Berlin & Boston: Walter De Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kijania-Placek, K. (2015). Descriptive indexicals, propositional attitudes and the double role of context. In H. Christiansen, I. Stojanovic, & G. Papadopoulos (Eds.), Modeling and using context (pp. 287–301). LNAI 9405. Dordrecht: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kijania-Placek, K. (2017). Descriptive indexicals and epistemic modality. Topoi, 36: 161–170.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kijania-Placek, K. (2018). Can Minimalism about Truth Embrace Polysemy? Synthese, 195, 955–985.10.1007/s11229-016-1228-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Kijania-Placek, K. (2018a). Descriptive singular terms. Organon F, 25(3), 290–315.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kratzer, A. (1989). An investigation of the lumps of thought. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12(5), 607–653.10.1007/BF00627775]Search in Google Scholar
[Kratzer, A. (1995). Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In G. Carlson, & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The Generic Book (pp. 125–175). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kratzer, A. (2017). Situations in natural language semantics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kripke, S. (2008). Frege’s theory of sense and reference: Some exegetical notes. Theoria, 74, 181–218.10.1111/j.1755-2567.2008.00018.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Kripke, S. (2009). Presupposition and anaphora: Remarks on the formulation of the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry, 40(3), 367–386.10.1162/ling.2009.40.3.367]Search in Google Scholar
[Künne, W. (1992). Hybrid proper names. Mind, 101(404), 721–731.10.1093/mind/101.404.721]Search in Google Scholar
[Levinson, S. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Lewis, D. (1975). Adverbs of quantification. In E. Keenan (Ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language (pp. 3–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Link, G. (1983). The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language (pp. 302–323), Berlin: de Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lücking, A. (2017). Indexicals as Weak Descriptors. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Semantics, IWCS 2017. Montpellier.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mostowski, A. (1957). On a generalization of quantifiers. Fundamenta Mathematicae XLIV, 12–36.10.4064/fm-44-1-12-36]Search in Google Scholar
[Neale, S. (1990). Descriptions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nunberg, G. (1978). The pragmatics of reference, Indiana Linguistics Club, Bloomington.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nunberg, G. (1979). The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy, Linguistics and Philosophy 3, 143–184.10.1007/BF00126509]Search in Google Scholar
[Nunberg, G. (1991). Indexicals and Descriptions in Interpretation, Ms.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nunberg, G. (1992). Two kinds of indexicality. In C. Barker, & D. Dowty (Eds.), Proceedings from the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory (pp. 283–301). Columbus: The Ohio State University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nunberg, G. (1993). Indexicality and deixis. Linguistics and Philosophy, 16, 1–43.10.1007/BF00984721]Search in Google Scholar
[Nunberg, G. (1995). Transfers of meaning. Journal of Semantics, 12, 109–132.10.1093/jos/12.2.109]Search in Google Scholar
[Nunberg, G. (2004). Descriptive indexicals and indexical descriptions. In M. Reimer, & A. Bezuidenhout (Eds.), Descriptions and Beyond (pp. 261–279). Oxford: Clarendon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nunberg, G. (2004a). The pragmatics of deferred interpretation. In L. Horn, & G. Ward (Eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 344–364). Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756959.ch15]Search in Google Scholar
[Partee, B. (1989). Binding implicit variables in quantified contexts. In C. Wiltshire, B. Music, & R. Graczyk (Eds.), Papers from CLS 25 (pp. 342–356). Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peters, S., & Westerståhl, D. (2006). Quantifiers in Language and Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Poller, O. (2008). Wyrażenia okazjonalne jako wyrażenia funkcyjne w semantyce Gottloba Fregego (Indexicals as functional expressions in the semantics of Gottlob Frege; in Polish). Diametros, 17, 1–29. Published under the name “Volha Kukushkina”.]Search in Google Scholar
[Portner, P. (2009). Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Powell, G. (2003). Language, thought and reference. PhD dissertation. University College London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Quine, W. V. O. (1968). Ontological relativity. Journal of Philosophy, 65, 185–212.10.2307/2024305]Search in Google Scholar
[Read, W., Dyer, M., Baker, E., Mutch, P., Butler, F., Quilici, A., & Reeves, J. (1990). Natural Language Sourcebook. Center for Technology Assessment, Center for the Study of Evaluation and Computer Science Department, UCLA.10.21236/ADA233005]Search in Google Scholar
[Recanati, F. (1993). Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Recanati, F. (1999). Situations and the structure of content. In K. Murasugi, & R. Stainton (Eds.), Philosophy and Linguistics (pp. 113–165). Boulder: Westview.]Search in Google Scholar
[Recanati, F. (2000). Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta: An Essay on Metarepresentation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5163.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Recanati, F. (2004). Literal Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Recanati, F. (2005). Deixis and anaphora. In Z. G. Szabo (Ed.), Semantics vs. Pragmatics (pp. 286–316). Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Recanati, F. (2010). Truth-conditional pragmatics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226993.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Rescher, N. (1962). Plurality-quantification. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 27(3), 373–374.]Search in Google Scholar
[Roberts, C. (2010). Retrievability and Incomplete Descriptions. Ms.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sæbø, K. (2015). Lessons from Descriptive Indexicals. Mind, 124, 1111–1161.10.1093/mind/fzv031]Search in Google Scholar
[Sag, I. (1981). Formal semantics and extralinguistic context. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical Pragmatics (pp. 273–293). New York: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schiffer, J. (1981). Indexicals and the theory of reference. Synthese, 49, 43–100.10.1007/BF01063915]Search in Google Scholar
[Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2004). Relevance Theory. In L. R. Horn, & G. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ward, G. (2004). Equatives and deferred reference. Language, 80(2), 262–289.10.1353/lan.2004.0102]Search in Google Scholar
