The Logic and Normative Force of Dual-Character Generics: Towards a Theoretical Model for the Study of Normatively Shifted Predications

Bicchieri, C. (2006). The grammar of society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bicchieri, C. (2016). Norms in the wild. How to diagnose, measure, and change social norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bicchieri, C., Muldoon, R., & Sontuoso, A. (2018). Social Norms. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/social-norms/.Search in Google Scholar

Brennan, G., Eriksson, L., Goodin, R. E., & Southwood, N. (2013). Explaining norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654680.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Burton-Roberts, N. (1977). Generic sentences and analyticity. Studies in Language, 1, 155–196.10.1075/sl.1.2.02burSearch in Google Scholar

Carlson, G. N. (1995), Truth conditions of generic sentences: Two contrasting views. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 224–238). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Carlson, G. N. (2005), Generics, habituals and iteratives.In A. Barber (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00256-XSearch in Google Scholar

Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 591–62.10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, A. (2001). On the generic use of indefinite singulars. Journal of Semantics, 18(3), 183–209.10.1093/jos/18.3.183Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, A. (2005). More than bare existence: An implication of existential bare plurals. Journal of Semantics, 23, 381–400.10.1093/jos/ffh031Search in Google Scholar

Del Pinal, G. & Reuter, K. (2017). Dual character concepts in social cognition: Commitments and the normative dimension of conceptual representation. Cognitive Science, 41, 477–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12456.10.1111/cogs.12456Search in Google Scholar

Gaymard, S. (2016). Conditionality and normative models in the field of social thinking. In: K.J. Fitzgerald (Ed.), Social Roles and Social Norms (pp. 1–11). New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, M. It’s not a compliment to say a courageous girl ‘has balls’. Retrieved from https://www.momtastic.com/parenting/687185-not-compliment-to-say-a-courageous-girl-balls/Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Y. (2003). Manifestations of genericity. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haslanger, S. (2010). Resisting reality: Social construction and social critique. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haslanger, S. (2014). The normal, the natural and the good: Generics and ideology. Politica & Societa, 3, 365–392.Search in Google Scholar

Karczewski, D. (2016). Generyczność w języku i myśleniu. Studium kognitywne. Kraków, Poland: Universitas.Search in Google Scholar

Knobe, J., & Prasada, S. (2011). Dual character concepts. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2965–2970). Boston, MA: Cognitive Science Society. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f60b/2d25367883d3f238925297eb4a263269be77.pdf?ga=2.46186663.122938527.1580650406-64654011.1580305066.Search in Google Scholar

Knobe, J., Prasada, S., & Newman, G. (2013). Dual character concepts and the normative dimension of conceptual representation. Cognition, 127, 242–257.10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.005Search in Google Scholar

Khalidi, M. A. (2013). Kinds (natural kinds vs. human kinds). In B. Kaldis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of philosophy and the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Krifka, M., Pelletier, F. J., Carlson, G., ter Meulen, A., Link, G., & Chierchia, G. (1995). Genericity: An introduction. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 1–125). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lawler, J. (1973). Studies in English generics (Doctoral dissertation). Reprinted in University of Michigan Papers in Linguistics 1(1). Retrieved from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~jlawler/generics.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Lavin, A. (2019). The explanatory link account of normality. Philosophy, 94(4), pp. 597–619. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819119000317.10.1017/S0031819119000317Search in Google Scholar

Leslie, S.-J. (2008). Generics: Cognition and acquisition. Philosophical Review, 117(1), 1–49.10.1215/00318108-2007-023Search in Google Scholar

Leslie, S.-J. (2012). Generics. In G. Russell & D. Graff Fara (Eds.), Routledge companion to philosophy of language (pp. 355–366). London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Leslie, S.-J. (2015). Hillary Clinton is the only man in the Obama administration: Dual character concepts, generics, and gender. Analytic Philosophy, 56(2), 111–141.10.1111/phib.12063Search in Google Scholar

Leslie, S.-J. (2017). The original sin of cognition: Fear, prejudice, and generalization. Journal of Philosophy, 114(8), 393–421.10.5840/jphil2017114828Search in Google Scholar

Leslie, S.-J. (forthcoming). ‘Real men’: Polysemy or implicature. Analytic Philosophy. Retrieved from https://www.princeton.edu/~sjleslie/Real%20Men%20Polysemy%20or%20Implicature%20final.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Merriam-Webster dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Search in Google Scholar

Nickel, B. (2008). Generics and the ways of normality. Linguistics and Philosophy, 33(6), 629–648.10.1007/s10988-008-9049-7Search in Google Scholar

Nickel, B. (2016). Between logic and the world: An integrated theory of generics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199640003.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Olubiński, A. (1990). Rola społeczna a procesy socjalizacji i wychowania. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 45(2), 267–284.Search in Google Scholar

Petit, P. (1999). A theory of normal and ideal conditions. Philosophical Studies, 96, 21–44.10.1023/A:1004225605930Search in Google Scholar

Prasada, S., Dillingham, E. M. (2006). Principled and statistical connections in common sense conception. Cognition, 99(1), 73–112.10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.003Search in Google Scholar

Prasada, S., Dillingham, E. M. (2009). Representation of principled connections: A window onto the formal aspect of common sense conception. Cognitive Science, 33, 401–448.10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01018.xSearch in Google Scholar

Prasada, S. (2010). Conceptual representations and some forms of genericity. In F. J. Pelletier (Ed.), Kinds, things, and stuff: Mass terms and generics. New Directions in Cognitive Science. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Prasada, S., Khemlani, S., Leslie, S.-J., & Glucksberg, S. (2013). Conceptual distinctions amongst generics. Cognition, 126, 405–422.10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.010Search in Google Scholar

Prentice, D. A., Miller, D. T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 243–256.10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.243Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the social world. The structure of human civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195396171.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Znaniecki, F. (1965). Social relations and social roles. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar