Conceptual Blends Across Image Macro Genres

Barczewska, Sh. (2017). Applications of conceptual blending: Headlines and their implicatures. Jezikoslovlje, 18(3), 423–446.Search in Google Scholar

Barczewska, Sh., & Barańska, P. (2019). Imagining the end of the world: Polish perspectives. In K. Kujawińska Courtney, T. Fisiak, A. Miksza & G. Zinkiewicz (Eds), What’s new in the new Europe? Redefining culture, politics, identity (pp. 376–86). Łódź, Poland: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.Search in Google Scholar

Bellar, W., Campbell, H. A., Cho, K. J., Terry, A., Tsuria, R., Yadlin-Segal, A., & Ziemer, J. (2013). Reading religion in Internet memes. Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture, 2(2), 1–39.10.1163/21659214-90000031Search in Google Scholar

Börzsei, L. K. (2013). Makes a meme instead: A concise history of Internet memes. New Media Studies Magazine, 7. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/lindaborzsei/2/Search in Google Scholar

Brandt, L., & Brandt, P. A. (2005). Making sense of a blend: A cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 216–249.10.1075/arcl.3.12braSearch in Google Scholar

Coulson, S., & Oakley, T. (2005). Blending and coded meaning: Literal and figurative meaning in cognitive semantics. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1510–1536.10.1016/j.pragma.2004.09.010Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, P. (2012). The language of Internet memes. In M. Mandiberg (Ed.), The social media reader (pp. 120–134). New York: New York University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. [1976] (2006). The selfish gene (30th-anniversary ed.). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, M. (2016). ‘I has seen image macros!’ Advice animal memes as visual-verbal jokes. International Journal of Communication, 10 (feature), 660–688. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/4101/1556Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Glebkin, V. (2013). A critical view on conceptual blending theory. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2404–2409). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2297721Search in Google Scholar

Know Your Meme. [Internet meme database]. Retrieved from knowyourmeme.comSearch in Google Scholar

MJ. 2010. Chuck Norris ma 70 lat (last updated March 1, 2018). Newsweek. Retrieved from https://www.newsweek.pl/chuck-norris-ma-70-lat-top-25-faktow-o-chucku-norrisie/w7lzhsvSearch in Google Scholar

Omazić, M. (2005). Cognitive linguistic theories in phraseology. Jezikoslovlje, 6(1), 37–56.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez Hernández, L. (2002). Blending versus conceptual interaction in the construction of illocutionary meaning: Counterfactual pieces of advice. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingles, 15, 181–194.10.14198/raei.2002.15.12Search in Google Scholar

Piekot, T. (2012). Pictorial representation of idioms in Internet humour. In L. Laineste, D. Brzozowska & W. Chłopicki (Eds.), Estonia and Poland. Creativity and tradition in cultural communication (2). Tartu, Estonia: ELM Scholarly Press; Eesti Kirjandusmuuseumi Teaduskirjastus. Retrieved from http://www.folklore.ee/pubte/eraamat/eestipoola/piekot.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Shifman, L. (2013). Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(3), 362–377.10.1111/jcc4.12013Search in Google Scholar

Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. (MIT press essential knowledge). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wiggins, B. E. (2019). The discursive power of memes in digital culture: Ideology, semiotics, and intertextuality (1st ed.). (Routledge studies in new media and cyberculture 45). New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780429492303Search in Google Scholar