[Adler, J.E. (1994). Fallacies and Alternative Interpretations. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72(3), 271-282. DOI: 10.1080/0004840941234609110.1080/00048409412346091]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ajdukiewicz, K. (1957). Zarys logiki (The Outline of Logic). Warsaw: PZWS - Państwowe Zakłady Wydawnictw Szkolnych.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ajdukiewicz, K. (1965). Co może szkoła zrobić dla podniesienia kultury logicznej uczniow (What school can do to improve the logical culture of students). In K. Ajdukiewicz, Język i poznanie, vol. II (Language and Cognition, vol. II) (pp. 322-331), Warsaw: PWN - Polish Scientific Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ajdukiewicz, K. (1974). Pragmatic Logic. (O.Wojtasiewicz, Trans.). Dordrecht/Boston/ Warsaw: D. Reidel Publishing Company & PWN - Polish Scientific Publishers. (Original work published in 1965).10.1007/978-94-010-2109-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Bar Hillel, Y. (1969). Formal Logic and Natural Languages. Foundations of Language 5.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barth, E. M. and E.C.W. Krabbe (1982). From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110839807]Search in Google Scholar
[Blair, J.A. (1992). Premissary Relevance. Argumentation 6 (2), 203-217.10.1007/BF00154326]Search in Google Scholar
[Blair, J.A. (2003). ‘Relationships Among Logic, Dialectic and Rhetoric’. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard and A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Anyone Who Has a View: Studies in Argumentation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 91-107.10.1007/978-94-007-1078-8_8]Search in Google Scholar
[Blair, J.A. (2004). Argument and its uses. Informal Logic 24(2), 137-151.10.22329/il.v24i2.2140]Search in Google Scholar
[Blair, J. A. (2007a). ‘Relevance, Acceptability and Sufficiency Today,’ Anthropology & Philosophy 8 (1-2), 33-47.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blair, J. A. (2007b). ‘The ‘Logic’ of Informal Logic’. In H. V. Hansen, C. W. Tindale, J. A. Blair, R. H. Johnson, D. M. Godden (Eds.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground. Proceedings of the Seventh OSSA Conference, University of Windsor, CD-ROM.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bocheński, J.M. (1974). Was ist Autorit¨at? Freiburg: Herder.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bocheński, J.M. (1994). Sto zabobonow (One Hundred Dogmas). Krakow: Philed.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bowles, G. (1990). Propositional Relevance. Informal Logic 12(2), 65-77.10.22329/il.v12i2.2602]Search in Google Scholar
[Brandom, R. (1994). Making It Explicit. Harvard: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Budzynska, K. (2010). Argument Analysis: Components of Interpersonal Argumentation. In P. Baroni et al. (Eds.), Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Computational]Search in Google Scholar
[Models of Argument (COMMA 2010) (pp. 135-146). Amsterdam etc.: IOS Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Budzynska, K., Araszkiewicz, M., Bogołębska, B., Cap, P., Ciecierski, T., Debowska- Kozlowska, K., Dunin-Kęplicz, B., Dziubiński, M., Federowicz, M., Gomolińska, A., Grabowski, A., Hołowka, T., Jochemczyk, Ł., Kacprzak, M., Kawalec, P., Kielar, M., Kisielewicz, A., Koszowy, M., Kublikowski, R., Kulicki, P., Kuzio, A., Lewiński, P., Lichański, J. Z., Malinowski, J., Marciszewski, W., Nieznański, E., Pietrzak, J., Pogonowski, J., Puczyłowski, T. A., Rytel, J., Sawicka, A., Selinger, M., Skowron, A., Skulska, J., Smolak, M., Sokoł, M., Sowińska, A., Stalmaszczyk, P., Stawecki, T., Stepaniuk, J., Strachocka, A., Suchoń,W., Szymanek, K., Tomczyk, J., Trypuz, R., Trzęsicki, K., Urbański, M., Wasilewska-Kamińska, E., Wieczorek, K. A., Witek, M., Wybraniec-Skardowska, U., Yaskorska, O., Załęska, M., Zdanowski, K. and Żurek, T. (2014). The Polish School of Argumentation: A Manifesto. Argumentation 28(3), 267-282. DOI 10.1007/s10503-014-9320-8 (Special Issue “The Polish School of Argumentation”, ed. by K. Budzynska and M. Koszowy).10.1007/s10503-014-9320-8(ed..Budzynska.Koszowy)]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Coniglione, F., R. Poli, and J. Woleński (1993, Eds.). Polish Scientific Philosophy. The Lvov-Warsaw School. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004457270]Search in Google Scholar
[Copi, I.M. (1954). An Introduction to Logic. New York: MacMillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Copi, I.M. (1965). Symbolic Logic. New York: Macmillan, 2nd ed.]Search in Google Scholar
[Czeżowski, T. (2000). On logical culture. In T. Czeżowski, Knowledge, Science, and Values. A Program for Scientific Philosophy (pp. 68-75). Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eemeren, F. H. van, and R. Grootendorst (1992). Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eemeren, F. H. van, B. Garssen, E. C.W. Krabbe, A.F. Snoeck Henkemans, B. Verheij, and J. H. M. Wagemans (2014). Handbook of Argumentation Theory. A Comprehensive Overview of the State of the Art. Dordrecht etc.: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Engel, M.S. (1976).With Good Reason. An Introduction to Informal Fallacies. New York: St Martin’s.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ennis, R. H. (1987). A Taxonomy of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities. In J. Baron and R. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice (pp. 9-26), New York: W. H. Freeman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Federowicz, M. and M. Sitek (2011, Eds.). A Society on the Road to Knowledge. Report on the State of Education 2010. Warsaw: Educational Research Institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[Freeman, J.B. (2005). Acceptable Premises: An Epistemic Approach to an Informal Logic Problem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610301]Search in Google Scholar
[Goddu, G.C. (2009). What is a ‘Real’ Argument? Informal Logic 29, 1-14.10.22329/il.v29i1.682]Search in Google Scholar
[Groarke, L. (1996). Logic, Art and Argument. Informal Logic 18(2-3), 105-129.10.22329/il.v18i2.2376]Search in Google Scholar
[Groarke, L. (2017). Informal logic. In E.N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-informal/.]Search in Google Scholar
[Griffin, N. (2013). Commentary on: Marcin Koszowy’s ‘Polish logical studies in an informal logic perspective”. In D. Mohammed & M. Lewiński (Eds.), Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22-26 May 2013 (pp. 1-5). Windsor, ON: OSSA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hamby, B. (2012). What a Real Argument Is. Informal Logic 32, 313-326.10.22329/il.v32i3.3531]Search in Google Scholar
[Hintikka, J. (1989). The Role of Logic in Argument. The Monist 72, 3-24.10.5840/monist19897211]Search in Google Scholar
[Hitchcock, D. (1996). Johnson’s The Rise of Informal Logic [critical review]. Informal Logic 18, 273-287.10.22329/il.v18i2.2385]Search in Google Scholar
[Hitchcock, D. (2006). Informal Logic and The Concept of Argument. In D. Jacquette (Ed.), Philosophy of Logic, Volume 5 of D. M. Gabbay, P. Thagard and J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science North Holland: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-044451541-4/50007-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Hołowka, T. (2005). Kultura logiczna w przykładach (Logical culture in examples). Warsaw: PWN - Polish Scientific Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jadacki, J.J. (2009). Polish Analytical Philosophy. Studies on Its Heritage. Warsaw: Semper.]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, R.H. (1996). The Rise of Informal Logic. Essays on Argumentation, Critical Thinking, Reasoning and Politics. Newport News, VA: Vale Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, R.H. (2000). Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.10.1023/A:1007837310258]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Johnson, R.H. (2006). Making Sense of ‘Informal Logic’. Informal Logic 23, 231-258.10.22329/il.v26i3.453]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, R.H. (2008). Informal Logic and Epistemology. Anthropology and Philosophy 8(1-2), 69-88.]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, R.H. (2009). Some Reflections on the Informal Logic Initiative. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 16(29), 17-46.]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, R. H. and J.A. Blair (1977). Logical Self-Defense (3rd edition, 1993). Toronto:McGraw-Hill Ryerson. First United States edition: 1994, New York: McGraw-Hill. New United States edition: 2006, New York: IDEA Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, R. H. and J.A. Blair (1987). The Current State of Informal Logic. Informal Logic 9 (2-3), 147-151.10.22329/il.v9i2.2671]Search in Google Scholar
[Kahane, H. (1971). Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric (8th edition, 1997), with Nancy Cavender. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kamiński, S. (1962). Systematyzacja typowych błędow logicznych (The systematization of typical logical fallacies). Roczniki Filozoficzne (Annales de Philosophie) 10, 5-39.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kneale, W., and M. Kneale (1962). The Development of Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koszowy, M. (2010). Pragmatic logic and the study of argumentation. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 22(35), 29-45.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koszowy, M. (2012). Logical fallacies as codified within the conceptual system of the Lvov-Warsaw School. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 30(43), 23-44.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koszowy, M. (2013). The methodological approach to argument evaluation: rules of defining as applied to assessing arguments. Filozofia Nauki (Philosophy of Science) 1(81), 23-36.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koszowy M. and M. Araszkiewicz (2014). The Lvov-Warsaw School as a Source of Inspiration for Argumentation Theory. Argumentation 28(3), 283-300. DOI 10.1007/s10503-014-9321-7 (Special Issue “The Polish School of Argumentation”, ed. by K. Budzynska & M. Koszowy).10.1007/s10503-014-9321-7(ed..Budzynska&M.Koszowy)]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kotarbinski, T. (1965). Praxiology: An Introduction to the Sciences of Efficient Action. Oxford: Pergamon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lapointe, S., Woleński, J., Marion, M., and Miskiewicz, W. (Eds.) (2009). The Golden Age of Polish Philosophy. Kazimierz Twardowski’s Philosophical Legacy. Dordrecht etc.: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-2401-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Lorenzen, P. (1955). Einf¨uhrung in die operative Logik und Mathematik, Berlin: Springer. Lorenz, K., Lorenzen, P. (1978). Dialogische Logik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.10.1007/978-3-662-01539-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Łupkowski, P. (2016). Logic of Questions in the Wild. Inferential Erotetic Logic in Information Seeking Dialogue Modelling. Studies in Logic, vol. 64, edited by Dov M. Gabbay. London: College Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Łuszczewska-Romahnowa, S. (1962). Pewne pojęcie poprawnej inferencji i pragmatyczne pojęcie wynikania (A certain notion of valid inference and the pragmatic notion of entailment). Studia Logica 13, 203-208.10.1007/BF02317279]Search in Google Scholar
[Marciszewski,W. (1991). Foundations of the art of argument. Logic Group Bulletin, 1, Warsaw Scientific Society, 45-49.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marciszewski,W. (1994). Logic from a Rhetorical Point of View. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110886627]Search in Google Scholar
[Massey, G. (1981). The Fallacy Behind Fallacies. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6, 489-500.10.1111/j.1475-4975.1981.tb00454.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[McCall, S. (1967). Polish Logic, 1920-1939. Oxford: Clarendon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Michalos, A.C. (1970). Improving Your Reasoning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Munson, R. (1977). The Way of Words: An Informal Logic. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Perelman, Ch. & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1958). Trait´e de l’argumentation: La nouvelle rh´etorique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reed, C. & Koszowy, M. (2011). The Development of Argument and Computation and Its Roots in the Lvov-Warsaw School. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 23(36), 15-37.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scriven, M. (1976). Reasoning. New York: McGraw Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scriven,M. (1980). The Philosophical and Pragmatic Significance of Informal Logic. In J. A. Blair & R. H. Johnson (Eds.), Informal Logic, The First International Symposium (pp. 147-160), Inverness, CA: Edgepress.]Search in Google Scholar
[Siegel, H. (1988). Educating Reason: Rationality, Critical Thinking, and Education. New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Simons, P. (1992). Philosophy and Logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski. Selected Essays. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-015-8094-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Simons, P. (2002). A Golden Age in Science and Letters: The Lwow-Warsaw Philosophical]Search in Google Scholar
[School. 1895-1939. An essay for Polish Class at Leeds Metropolitan University, https://sites.google.com/site/petermsimons/peter-s-files.]Search in Google Scholar
[Simons, P. (2014). The Complexity of Language: Its Sources, Results, and Description. A Lvov-Warsaw School Supplement. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 36(49) (in press).10.2478/slgr-2014-0005]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, B. (1994). Kasimir Twardowski: On Content and Object. In B. Smith (1994), Austrian Philosophy: The Legacy of Franz Brentano (pp. 155-195, Ch. 6), Chicago & LaSalle: Open Court.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, B. (2006). Why Polish philosophy does not exist. In J.J. Jadacki & J. Paśniczek (Eds.), The Lvov-Warsaw School - The New Generation (pp. 19-39). Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, vol. 89. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.10.1163/9789401203371_003]Search in Google Scholar
[Szymanek, K., Wieczorek, K. and Wojcik, A.S. (2005). Sztuka argumentacji. Ćwiczenia w badaniu argumentow (The Art of Argument: Exercises in Examining Arguments). Warsaw: PWN - Polish Scientific Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tarski, A. (1995). Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of Deductive Sciences. New York: Dover Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomas, S. N. (1973). Practical Reasoning in Natural Language, (3rd editon, 1986), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.]Search in Google Scholar
[Twardowski, K. (1965). Symbolomania i pragmatofobia (Symbolomania and pragmatophobia). In K. Twardowski,Wybrane pisma filozoficzne (Selected Philosophical Writings) (pp. 354-363).Warsaw: PWN - Polish Scientific Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Urbański M. and Łupkowski P. (2010). Erotetic Search Scenarios: Revealing Interrogator’s Hidden Agenda. In P. Łupkowski & M. Purver (Eds.) Semantics]Search in Google Scholar
[and Pragmatics of Dialogue (pp. 67-74). Poznań: Polish Society for Cognitive Science.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walton, D. (1982). Topical Relevance in Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pb.iii.8]Search in Google Scholar
[Walton, D. (1984). Logical Dialogue-Games and Fallacies. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America, 1984.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walton, D. (1990). What is Reasoning? What is an Argument? The Journal of Philosophy 87, 399-419.10.2307/2026735]Search in Google Scholar
[Walton, D. (1995). Entry on Informal Logic. In R. Audi (Ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walton, D. (1997). Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments from Authority. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walton, D. (2000). Problems and Useful Techniques: My Experiences in Teaching Courses in Argumentation, Informal Logic and Critical Thinking. Informal Logic, 20(2), Teaching Supplement #2, TS35-TS38.10.22329/il.v20i2.2272]Search in Google Scholar
[Walton, D. (2008). Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walton, D. and F. Macagno (2010). Defeasible classifications and inferences from definitions. Informal Logic 30, 34-61.10.22329/il.v30i1.692]Search in Google Scholar
[Walton, D. and T.F. Gordon (2015). Formalizing informal logic. Informal Logic 35, 508-538.10.22329/il.v35i4.4335]Search in Google Scholar
[Weinstein, M. (1990). Towards a research agenda for Informal Logic and Critical Thinking. Informal Logic 12, 121-143.10.22329/il.v12i3.2609]Search in Google Scholar
[Wenzel, J. (1990). Three Perspectives on Argumentation. In R. Trapp & J. Schuetz (Eds.), Perspectives on Argumentation: Essays in Honour of Wayne Brockreide (pp. 9-26), Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiśniewski, A. (1995). The Posing of Questions: Logical Foundations of Erotetic Inferences. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Synthese Library, vol. 252.10.1007/978-94-015-8406-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Woleński, J. (1989). Logic and Philosophy in the Lvov-Warsaw School. Dordrecht etc.: D. Reidel Publishing Company.10.1007/978-94-009-2581-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Woleński, J. (1995). Mathematical logic in Poland 1900-1939: People, circles, institutions, ideas. Modern Logic 5, 363-405.]Search in Google Scholar
[Woleński, J. (2013). Lvov-Warsaw School. In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lvov-warsaw/.]Search in Google Scholar
[Woods, J. (1994). “Sunny prospects for relevance?”. In R.H. Johnson and J. A. Blair (eds.), New Essays in Informal Logic, (pp. 93-104), Windsor, ON: Informal Logic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Woods, J. (2004). The Death of Argument: Fallacies in Agent-Based Reasoning. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer.10.1007/978-1-4020-2712-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Woods, J. (2006). “Pragma-Dialectics: A Retrospective”. In P. Houtlosser & Agnes van Rees (Eds.), Condsidering Pragma-Dialectics, New York and London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Woods J. and D.M. Gabbay (2002). “Formal approaches to practical reasoning: A survey”. In D.M. Gabbay, R.H. Johnson, H.-J. Ohlbach and J. Woods (Eds), Handbook of the Logic of Argument and Inference: The Turn Toward the Practical, vol. 1 of the series Studies in Logic and Practical Reasoning (pp. 449-481), Amsterdam: North-Holland.10.1016/S1570-2464(02)80013-1]Search in Google Scholar