Ad Hominem Arguments, Rhetoric, and Science Communication

Anderson, T. 2017. Communicating science-based messages on vaccines. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 95, 670-671.10.2471/BLT.17.021017Search in Google Scholar

Black, S., Rappuoli R. 2010. A Crisis of Public Confidence in Vaccines. Science Translational Medicine 2(61), 61mr1.10.1126/scitranslmed.3001738Search in Google Scholar

Ceccarelli, L. 2011. Manufactured Scientific Controversy: Science, Rhetoric, and Public Debate. Rhetoric & Public Affairs 14(2), 195-228.10.1353/rap.2010.0222Search in Google Scholar

Collins, H. 2010. Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226113821.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Collins, H., Evans, R. 2008. Rethinking expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226113623.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Daemmrich, A. 2002. A tale of two experts: thalidomide and political engagement in the United States and West Germany. Social History of Medicine 15(1), 137-158.10.1093/shm/15.1.137Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Davies, P., Chapman, S., Leask, J. 2002. Antivaccination activists on the world wide web. Archives of disease in childhood 87(1), 22-25.10.1136/adc.87.1.22Search in Google Scholar

Derkatch, C. 2016. Bounding Biomedicine. Evidence and Rhetoric in the New Science of Alternative Medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226345987.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Dubé, E., Laberge, C., Guay, M., Bramadat, P., Roy, R., Bettinger, J.A. 2013. Vaccine hesitancy. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics 9(8), 1763-1773.10.4161/hv.24657Search in Google Scholar

Flaherty, D.K. 2011. The vaccine-autism connection: a public health crisis caused by unethical medical practices and fraudulent science. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 45(10), 1302-1304.10.1345/aph.1Q318Search in Google Scholar

Freudenburg, W.R., Gramling R., Davidson, D.J. 2008. Scientific certainty argumentation methods (SCAMs): science and the politics of doubt. Sociological Inquiry 78(1), 2-38.10.1111/j.1475-682X.2008.00219.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Galilei, G. 1638 [2010] Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences. Henry Crew (translation). Cosimo Classics.Search in Google Scholar

Goldman, A. 2001. Experts: Which ones should you trust? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63, 85-110.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00093.xSearch in Google Scholar

Goodwin, J., Honeycutt, L. 2009. When Science Goes Public: from Technical Arguments to Appeals to Authority. Studies in Communication Sciences 9(2), 19-30.Search in Google Scholar

Greene, J.A. 2007. Pharmaceutical marketing research and the prescribing physician. Annals of Internal Medicine 146(10), 742-748.10.7326/0003-4819-146-10-200705150-00008Search in Google Scholar

Jacobs, S. 2000. Rhetoric and dialectic from the standpoint of normative pragmatics. Argumentation 14(3), 261-286.10.1023/A:1007853013191Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, S. 2008. Predicaments of politicization in the debate over abstinenceonly sex education. In van Eemeren, F. H. & Garssen B. (Eds.) Controversy, confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 215-230.10.1075/cvs.6.14jacSearch in Google Scholar

Kazan, O. 2017. The Shadow Network of Anti-Vax Doctors. The Atlantic, January 18, 2017. URL: https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2017/01/when-the-doctor-is-a-vaccine-skeptic/513383/ (Accessed 27 July 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Martini, C. 2015. Expertise and institutional design in economic committees. Journal of Economic Methodology 22:3, 391-409.10.1080/1350178X.2015.1071509Search in Google Scholar

Okuhara, T., Ishikawa, H., Okada, M., Kato, M., Kiuchi, T. 2017. Readability comparison of pro-and anti-HPV-vaccination online messages in Japan. Patient Education and Counseling 100(10), 1859-1866.10.1016/j.pec.2017.04.013Search in Google Scholar

Oreskes, N. 2004. The scientific consensus on climate change. Science 306(5702), 1686-1686.10.1126/science.1103618Search in Google Scholar

Oreskes, N., Conway, E. M. 2010. Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Reiss, J. 2007. Error in Economics: Towards a More Evidence-Based Methodology. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203086797.ch1Search in Google Scholar

Russell, N. 2009. Communicating Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Settle, T.B. 1983. Galileo and early experimentation. In Aris, R., Davis, H. T., Stuewer, R. H. (Eds.) Springs of Scientific Creativity. Essays on Founders of Modern Science. University of Minnesota Press, 3-20.Search in Google Scholar

Shanteau, J. 1992. The psychology of experts an alternative view. In Wright, G., Bolger F. (Eds.) Expertise and Decision Support. New York: Plenum Press, 11-23.10.1007/978-0-585-34290-0_2Search in Google Scholar

Shanteau, J., Weiss, D. J., Thomas, R. P., Pounds, J. C. 2002. Performance-Based Assessment of Expertise: How to Decide If Someone Is an Expert or Not. European Journal of Operational Research 136(2), 253-263.10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00113-8Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, L.E., Swerdfeger, A.L., Eslick, G.D. 2014. Vaccines are not associated with autism: an evidence-based meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies. Vaccine 32(29), 3623-3629.10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.04.085Search in Google Scholar

Tomljenovic L., Christopher A.S. 2015. Answers to common misconceptions regarding the toxicity of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines. In Shoenfeld Y., Agmon-Levin N., Tomljenovic L. (Eds.). Vaccines and autoimmunity. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, 43-56.10.1002/9781118663721.ch4Search in Google Scholar

Walton, D. 1989. Reasoned use of expertise in argumentation. Argumentation 3, 59-73.10.1007/BF00116417Search in Google Scholar

Walton, D. 1997. Appeal to Expert Opinion. Arguments from Authority. University Park: Penn State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Walton, D. 2002. Informal Logic. A Pragmatic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511808630Search in Google Scholar

Walton, D., Godden, D.M. 2005. The Nature and Status of Critical Questions in Argumentation Schemes. OSSA Conference Archive, 56 URL: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA6/papers/56 (Accessed 27 July 2018).Search in Google Scholar