Open Access

Norms in Deliberation: The Role of the Principles of Justice and Universalization in Practical Discourses on the Justice of Norms


Cite

Alexy, R. (1978). Theorie der Juristischen Argumentation. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar

Alexy, R. (1988). Problems of Discourse Theory. Cr´ıtica 20(58), 43-65.10.22201/iifs.18704905e.1988.656Search in Google Scholar

Alexy, R. (1993). Derecho y Razon Pr´actica. M´exico: Fontamara.Search in Google Scholar

Bermejo-Luque, L. (2011). Giving Reasons: A Linguistic-Pragmatic Approach to Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-1761-9Search in Google Scholar

Dancy, J. (2004). Ethics without Principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0199270023.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

van Eemeren, F. and Grootendorst, R. (1982). The speech acts of arguing and convincing in externalized discussions. Journal of Pragmatics 6, 1-24.10.1016/0378-2166(82)90036-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

van Eemeren, F. and Grootendorst, R. (2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectics Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511616389Search in Google Scholar

Garcia-Carpintero, M. (2011). Constitutive vs. normative accounts of speech and mental acts. In A. Reboul (Ed.), Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan. URL http://www.unige.ch/lettres/philo/mulligan/festschrift/Garcia-Carpintero-paper.pdf (Last accessed, 30 April 2018)Search in Google Scholar

Gauker, C. (1997). Domain of Discourse. Mind 106, 1-32.10.1093/mind/106.421.1Search in Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, T. McCarthy (trans.). Boston: Beacon. [German, 1981]Search in Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1990). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. C. Lenhardt and S. W. Nicholsen (Trans.). Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. [German, 1983]Search in Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. W. Rehg (Trans.). Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. [German, 1992]10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kock, C. (2007). Norms of legitimate dissensus. Informal Logic 27, 179-196.10.22329/il.v27i2.474Search in Google Scholar

Lafont, C. (2004). Moral objectivity and reasonable agreement: can realism be reconciled with Kantian constructivism? Ratio Juris 17(1), 27-51.10.1111/j.0952-1917.2004.00253.xSearch in Google Scholar

Mason, A. (2009). Justice, Holism and Principles. Res Publica 15, 179-194.10.1007/s11158-009-9087-1Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. [First Edition, 1971]10.4159/9780674042582Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1980). Kantian Constructivism in Moral Philosophy. The Journal of Philosophy 77(9), 515-572.10.2307/2025790Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. E. Kelly (Ed.) Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv31xf5v0Search in Google Scholar

Sbisá, M. (2017). Varieties of Norms. In M. Witek and I. Witczak-Plisiecka (Eds.), Normativity and Variety of Speech Actions, to appear. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Updated Edition, 2003].Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2199-6059
ISSN:
0860-150X
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Philosophy, other