[Donnellan, K. S., (1966). Reference and definite descriptions, Philosophical Review, vol. 77, pp. 281-304.10.2307/2183143]Search in Google Scholar
[Duží M. (2010). The paradox of inference and the non-triviality of analytic information. Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 473-510.10.1007/s10992-010-9127-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Duží M. (2010a). Tenses and truth-conditions: a plea for if-then-else. In the Logica Yearbook 2009, Peliš, M. (ed.), London: College Publications, pp. 63-80.]Search in Google Scholar
[Duží M., Jespersen B. and Materna P. (2010). Procedural Semantics for Hyperintensional Logic. Foundations and Applications of Trasnsparent Intensional Logic. Berlin: Springer, series Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol. 17.10.1007/978-90-481-8812-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Duží, M. (2009). Strawsonian vs. Russellian definite descriptions. Organon F, 2009, vol. XVI, No. 4, pp. 587-614.]Search in Google Scholar
[Duží,M. (2014). How to Unify Russellian and Strawsonian Definite Descriptions. In Recent Trends in Philosophical Logic, Studia Logica, Roberto Ciuni, Heinrich Wansing, Caroline Willcommen (eds.), vol. 41, pp. 85-101.10.1007/978-3-319-06080-4_7]Search in Google Scholar
[Duží, M. (2017). If structured propositions are logical procedures, then how are procedures individuated? Synthese special issue on the Unity of propositions. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-017-1595-510.1007/s11229-017-1595-5]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fintel, Kai von (2004). Would you believe it? The King of France is Back! (Presuppositions and Truth-Value Intuitions). In: Descriptions and Beyond, Reimer, M., Bezuidenhout, A. (eds.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 315-341.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frege, G. (1884). Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik, Breslau: W. Koebner.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frege, G. (1892). ¨Uber Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift f¨ur Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100: 25-50.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gahér, F. (2001). Negation and presupposition. In: The Logica Yearbook 2000, Ondrej Majer (ed.), Prague: Filosofia, pp. 133-150.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gundel, J. K. (1999). Topic, focus and the grammar pragmatics interface. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 6.1, J. Alexander, N. Han and M. Minnick (eds.), pp. 185-200.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gundel, J. K. and Fretheim, T. (2004). Topic and Focus. In The Handbook of Pragmatics. Laurence Horn and Gregory Ward (eds.), Blackwell, pp. 174-196.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hajičová, E. (2008). What we are talking about and what we are saying about it. In: Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, A. Gelbukh (Ed.), Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag LNCS, vol. 4919, pp. 241-262.10.1007/978-3-540-78135-6_21]Search in Google Scholar
[Horn, L.R. (1989). A Natural History of Negation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Horn, L.R.,Wansing, H. (2017). Negation. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/negation/.10.1002/9781405164801.ch18]Search in Google Scholar
[Jespersen, B. (2006). The phone booth puzzle, Organon F, vol. 13, pp. 411-38.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jespersen, B. (2010). How hyper are hyperpropositions?, Language and Linguistics Compass, vol. 4, pp. 96-106.10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00181.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Jespersen, B. (2012). Recent work on structured meaning and propositional unity, Philosophy Compass, vol. 7, pp. 620-30.10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00509.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Jespersen, B., Carrara, M., Duží, M. (2017). Iterated privation and positive predication, Journal of Applied Logic, Vol. 25, Supplement, December 2017, Pages S48-S71.10.1016/j.jal.2017.12.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Jespersen, B., Duží, M. (2015). Introduction to the special issue on Hyperintensionality. Synthese, vol. 192, No. 3, pp. 525-534.10.1007/s11229-015-0665-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Kripke, S. A. (1977). Speaker’s reference and semantic reference. In Peter A. French, Theodore E. Uehling Jr & Howard K. Wettstein (eds.), Studies in the Philosophy of Language. University of Minnesota Press, pp. 255-296.10.1111/j.1475-4975.1977.tb00045.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Ludlow, P. (2007). Descriptions. Available from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/descriptions/#2.]Search in Google Scholar
[Neale, S., (1990). Descriptions. Cambridge: MIT Press Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Russell, B. (1905). On denoting, Mind, vol. 14, pp. 479-493.10.1093/mind/XIV.4.479]Search in Google Scholar
[Russell, B., (1957). Mr. Strawson on referring, Mind, vol. 66, pp. 385-389.10.1093/mind/LXVI.263.385]Search in Google Scholar
[Strawson, P. F. (1950). On referring, Mind, vol. 59, pp. 320-334.10.1093/mind/LIX.235.320]Search in Google Scholar
[Strawson, P.F. (1952). Introduction to Logical Theory, London: Methuen.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tichý, P. (1988). The Foundations of Frege’s Logic, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tichý, P. (2004). Collected Papers in Logic and Philosophy, V. Svoboda, B. Jespersen, C. Cheyne (eds.), Prague: Filosofia, Czech Academy of Sciences, and Dunedin: University of Otago Press.]Search in Google Scholar