[Aderajew, T. & Kedir, M. (2009). Ethiopian Criminal Procedure: Teaching Mate- rial. Addis Ababa: Justice and Legal System Research Institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of Written Discourse: A genre-based view. London and New York: Continuum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cotterill, J. (2003). Language and Power in Court: A Linguistic Analysis of the OJ Simpson Trial. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230006010]Search in Google Scholar
[Coulthard, M. & Johnson, A. (2007). An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. London/New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203969717]Search in Google Scholar
[Constructing crime stories in court (2010). In M. Coulthard & Johnson, A. (Eds.), Handbook of Forensic Linguistics (pp. 199-217). Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Jus- tice System. Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hasan, R. (2000). The uses of talk. In S. Sarangi & Coulthard, M. (Eds.), Discourse and Social Life (pp. 30-81). London: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heffer, C. (2005). The Language of Jury Trial: A Corpus-Aided Analysis of Legal- Lay Discourse. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230502888]Search in Google Scholar
[Henning, T. (1999). Judicial summation: the trial judge’s version of the facts or the chimera of neutrality. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. 12, 171-213.]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, K. (2006). Speaker normalization in speech perception. In D. B. Pisoni & Remez, R.E. (Eds.), The Handbook of Speech Perception. Oxford: Black- well.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maley, Y., Candlin, C.N., Crichton, J., & Koster, P. (1995). Orientations to lawyer- client interviews. Forensic Linguistics 2, 42-55.]Search in Google Scholar
[McCullough, G. (1991). Juror decisions as a function of text format of opening statements and closing arguments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Kansas.]Search in Google Scholar
[Robertshaw, P. (1998). Summary Justice. London: Cassell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosulek, L. F. (2010). Prosecution and defense closing speeches the creation of con- trastive closing arguments. In M. Coulthard & Johnson, A. (Eds.), Handbook of Forensic Linguistics (pp. 218-230). Routledge.10.4324/9780203855607.ch15]Search in Google Scholar
[Schum, D. (1993). Argument structuring and evidence evaluation. In R. Hastie (Ed.), Inside the juror: The psychology of juror decision making (pp. 175-191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spiecker, S. & Worthington, D. (2003). The influence of opening statement/closing argument organizational strategy on juror verdict and damage awards. Law and Human Behavior. 27(4), 437-56.10.1023/A:1024041201605]Search in Google Scholar
[Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolchover, D. (1989). Should judges sum up on the facts? Criminal Law Review. 781-792. ]Search in Google Scholar
