Supporting Argumentation Schemes in Argumentative Dialogue Games

[Amgoud et al., 2000] Amgoud, L., Maudet, N., and Parsons, S. (2000). Modeling Dialogues Using Argumentation. In Durfee, E. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems, pp. 31-38.10.1109/ICMAS.2000.858428Search in Google Scholar

[Atkinson et al., 2004] Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., and McBurney, P. (2004).Search in Google Scholar

Justifying Practical Reasoning. In Rahwan, I., Moraitis, P., and Reed, C., editors, First International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Sys- tems. Search in Google Scholar

[Atkinson et al., 2006] Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., and McBurney, P. (2006).Search in Google Scholar

Computational representation of practical argument. Synthese, 152(2), pp. 157-206. 10.1007/s11229-005-3488-2Search in Google Scholar

[Bench-Capon, 1998] Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (1998). Specification and implemen- tation of toulmin dialogue game. In Proceedings of JURIX 98, pp. 5-20. Search in Google Scholar

[Bench-Capon and Prakken, 2010] Bench-Capon, T. J. M. and Prakken, H. (2010).Search in Google Scholar

Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law. Artificial Intel- ligence and Law, 18(2), pp. 153-174. 10.1007/s10506-010-9094-8Search in Google Scholar

[Bench-Capon et al., 2011] Bench-Capon, T. J. M., Prakken, H., and Visser, W. (2011). Argument schemes for two-phase democratic deliberation. In Pro- ceedings of the 13th International Conference on AI and Law (ICAIL 2011), pp. 21-30. 10.1145/2018358.2018361Search in Google Scholar

[Bench-Capon et al., 2013] Bench-Capon, T. J. M., Prakken, H., Wyner, A., and Atkinson, K. (2013). Argument schemes for reasoning about legal cases. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelli- gence and Law (ICAIL 2013), pp. 13-22, Rome, Italy. Search in Google Scholar

[Carnap, 1947] Carnap, R. (1947). On the application of inductive logic. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 8(1), pp. 133-148. 10.2307/2102920Search in Google Scholar

[Chesnevar et al., 2006] Chesnevar, C., McGinnis, J., Modgil, S., Rahwan, I., Reed, C., Simari, G., South, M., Vreeswijk, G., and Willmott, S. (2006).Search in Google Scholar

Towards an argument interchange format. Knowledge Engineering Review, 21(4), pp. 293-316. 10.1017/S0269888906001044Search in Google Scholar

[Girle, 1993] Girle, R. A. (1993). Dialogue And Entrenchment. In Proceedings Of The 6th Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Symposium, pp. 185-189. Search in Google Scholar

[Girle, 1994] Girle, R. A. (1994). Knowledge Organized And Disorganized. Proceed- ings of the 7th Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Symposium, pp. 198-203. [Girle, 1996] Girle, R. A. (1996). Commands in dialogue logic. Practical Reasoning: International Conference on Formal and Applied Practical Reasoning, Springer Lecture Notes in AI, 1085, pp. 246-260. 10.1007/3-540-61313-7_77Search in Google Scholar

[Hamblin, 1970] Hamblin, C. L. (1970). Fallacies. Methuen and Co. Ltd. Search in Google Scholar

[Katzav et al., 2004] Katzav, J., Reed, C., and Rowe, G. (2004). Argument research corpus. In Practical Applications in Language and Computers (Proceedings of the 2003 Conference), pp. 229-239. Search in Google Scholar

[McBurney and Parsons, 2002] McBurney, P. and Parsons, S. (2002). Dialogue games in multi-agent systems. Informal Logic, 22(3), pp. 257-274. [Moore and Hobbes, 1996] Moore, D. and Hobbes, D. (1996). Computational uses of philosophical dialogue theories. Informal Logic, 18(2 and 3), pp. 131-163. Search in Google Scholar

[Parsons et al., 1998] Parsons, S., Sierra, C., and Jennings, N. (1998). Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation, 8(3), pp. 261-292. 10.1093/logcom/8.3.261Search in Google Scholar

[Pollock, 1995] Pollock, J. L. (1995). Cognitive Carpentry. A Blueprint for How to Build a Person, MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/1887.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[Prakken et al., 2013] Prakken, H., Wyner, A., Bench-Capon, T., and Atkinson, K. (2013). A formalisation of argumentation schemes for legal case-based rea- soning in aspic+ (to appear). Journal of Logic and Computation, 10.1093/logcom/ext010Search in Google Scholar

[Rahwan et al., 2007] Rahwan, I., Zablith, F., and Reed, C. (2007). Towards large scale argumentation support on the semantic web. In Proceedings of AAAI-07, pp. 1446-1451. Search in Google Scholar

[Ravenscroft and Matheson, 2002] Ravenscroft, A. and Matheson, P. (2002). De- veloping and evaluating dialogue games for collaborative e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, pp. 93-101. 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00215.xSearch in Google Scholar

[Ravenscroft et al., 2009] Ravenscroft, A.,Wells, S., Sagar,M., and Reed, C. (2009).Search in Google Scholar

Mapping persuasive dialogue games onto argumentation structures. In Pro- ceedings of the Symposium on Persuasive Technology and Digital Behaviour Intervention hosted at the AISB Convention. Search in Google Scholar

[Reed and Rowe, 2004] Reed, C. and Rowe, G. (2004). Araucaria: Software for argument analysis, diagramming and representation. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools, 13(04), pp. 961-979. Search in Google Scholar

[Reed andWalton, 2004] Reed, C. andWalton, D. (2004). Towards a formal and im- plemented model of argumentation schemes in agent communication. In Rah- wan, I., Moraitis, P., and Reed, C., editors, First International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. Search in Google Scholar

[Reed and Wells, 2007] Reed, C. and Wells, S. (2007). Dialogical argument as an interface to complex debates. IEEE Intelligent Systems Journal: Special Issue on Argumentation Technology, 22(6), pp. 60-65.Search in Google Scholar

[Reed et al., 2010] Reed, C., Wells, S., Budzynska, K., and Devereux, J. T. (2010). Building arguments with argumentation: the role of illocutionary force in computational models of argument. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2010). Search in Google Scholar

[Reed et al, 2008] Reed, C., Wells, S., Rowe, G. W. A., and Devereux, J. (2008). Aif+: Dialogue in the argument interchange format. In 2nd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2008). Search in Google Scholar

[Reed et al., 2011] Reed, C., Wells, S., Snaith, M., Budzynska, K., and Lawrence, J. (2011). Using an argument ontology to develop pedagogical tool suites.\ In Proceedings of the Third International Congress on Tools for Teaching Logic (TICTTL 2011).Search in Google Scholar

[Saint-Dizier, 2012] Saint-Dizier, P. (2012). Processing natural language arguments with the <TextCoop> platform. Journal of Argument and Computation, 3(1), pp. 49-82. 10.1080/19462166.2012.663539Search in Google Scholar

[Toulmin, 1958] Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses Of Argument, Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[Walton et al., 2008]Walton, D., Reed, C., and Macagno, F. (2008). Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511802034Search in Google Scholar

[Walton, 1984] Walton, D. N. (1984). Logical Dialogue-Games And Fallacies. Uni- versity Press Of America. Search in Google Scholar

[Walton and Krabbe, 1995] Walton, D. N. and Krabbe, E. C. W. (1995). Commit- ment in Dialogue. SUNY series in Logic and Language. State University of New York Press. Search in Google Scholar

[Wells, 2007] Wells, S. (2007). Formal Dialectical Games in Multiagent Argumen- tation, University of Dundee. [Wells and Reed, 2012] Wells, S. and Reed, C. (2012). A domain specific language for describing diverse systems of dialogue. Journal of Applied Logic, 10(4), pp. 309-329. 10.1016/j.jal.2012.09.001Search in Google Scholar

[Wirth, 1977] Wirth, N. (1977). What can we do about the unnecessary diversity of notation for syntactic definitions? Communications of the ACM, 20(11), pp. 822-823. Search in Google Scholar

[Wyner and Bench-Capon, 2007] Wyner, A. Z. and Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2007). Argument schemes for legal case-based reasoning. In Proceedings of Jurix 2007, pp. 139-149. Search in Google Scholar

[Wyner et al., 2011]Wyner, A. Z., Bench-Capon, T. J. M., and Atkinson, K. (2011).Search in Google Scholar

Towards formalising argumentation about legal cases. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on AI and Law, pp. 1-10. Search in Google Scholar

[Yuan and Wells, 2013] Yuan, T. and Wells, S. (2013). Protocl: Specifying dialogue games using uml and ocl. In Grasso, F., and Green, N., and Reed, C., editors, Thirteenth International Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA13), pp. 74-85. Search in Google Scholar