Maneuvering with the Burden of Proof: Confrontational Strategies in Dealing with Political Accountability

Andone, C. (2013). Argumentation in Political Interviews. Analyzing and Evaluating Responses to Accusations of Inconsistency. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/aic.5Search in Google Scholar

Andone, C. (2014). The burden of proof in practices of political accountability. In Saftoiu, R., I. Neagu & S. Mada (Eds.), Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue. (forthcoming). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Bovens, M. (2006). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal 13(4), 447-468.10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.xSearch in Google Scholar

Curtin, D. (2007). Holding (quasi-) autonomous EU administrative actors to public account. European Law Journal 13(4), 523-541.10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00382.xSearch in Google Scholar

Curtin, D. & Nollkaemper, A. (2005). Conceptualizing accountability in international and European Law. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law XXXVI, 3-20.10.1017/S0167676805000036Search in Google Scholar

Eemeren, F. H. van. (2010). Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/aic.2Search in Google Scholar

Eemeren, F. H. van & Garssen, B. (2011). Exploiting the room for strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Dealing with audience demand in the European Parliament. In F. H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.), Exploring Argumentative Contexts (pp. 43-58). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Eemeren, F. H. van & Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.10.1515/9783110846089Search in Google Scholar

Eemeren, F. H. van & R. Grootendorst (2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumenta- tion. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eemeren, F. H. van & P. Houtlosser. (2002). Strategic maneuvering with the burden of proof. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Advances in Pragma-dialectics (pp. 13-28). Amsterdam/Newport News, Virginia: Sic Sat/Vale Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eemeren, F. H. van, Houtlosser, P. & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2007). Argu- mentative Indicators in Discourse. A Pragma-dialectical Study. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6244-5Search in Google Scholar

Eemeren, F. H. van, Houtlosser, P. & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2008). Dialectical profiles and indicators of argumentative moves. Journal of Pragmatics 20, 475-493.10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.002Search in Google Scholar

Houtlosser, P. (2002). Indicators of a point of view. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Advances in Pragma-dialectics (pp. 169-184). Amsterdam/Newport News, Virginia: Sic Sat/Vale Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kauffeld, F. J. (2007). The burden of proof: A macro or a micro level concept? In H. Hansen & R. Pinto (Eds.), Reason Reclaimed (pp. 65-73). Newport News, Virginia: Vale Press.Search in Google Scholar

Montgomery, M. (2007). The Discourse of Broadcast News. A Linguistic Approach. London/New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203006634Search in Google Scholar

Mulgan, R. 2003. Holding Power to Account. Accountability in Modern Democra- cies. Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781403943835Search in Google Scholar

Oliver, D. (2009). Executive accountability: A key concept. In L. Verhey, Ph. Kiiver & S. Loeffen (Eds.), Political Accountability and European Integration (pp. 9-31). Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Rescher, N. (1977). Dialectics. A Controversy-oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge. Albany: State Universiy of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rescher, N. (2006). Presumption and the Practices of Tentative Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498848Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438Search in Google Scholar

Shackleton, M. (1998). The European Parliament’s new committees of inquiry: Tiger or paper tiger? Journal of Common Market Studies 36(1), 115-130.10.1111/1468-5965.00100Search in Google Scholar

Strøm, K. (2000). Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research 37, 261-289.10.1111/1475-6765.00513Search in Google Scholar

Tomkins, A. (2008). Political accountability in the United Kingdom. In L. Verhey, H. Broeksteeg & I. van den Driessche (Eds.), Political Accountability in Europe: Which Way Forward? (pp. 243-269). Europa Law Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Tseronis, A. (2009). Qualifying Standpoints. Stance Adverbs as a Presentational Device for Managining the Burden of Proof. Utrecht: LOT.Search in Google Scholar

Verhey, L. (2009). Political accountability: A useful concept in EU inter-institutional relations? In L. Verhey, Ph. Kiiver & S. Loeffen (Eds.), Political Ac- countability and European Integration (pp. 55-70). Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Wonka, A. (2007). Technocratic and independent? The appointment of European Commissioners and its policy implications. Journal of European Public Pol- icy 14(2), pp. 169-189. 10.1080/13501760601122241Search in Google Scholar