Measuring Women’s Satisfaction with Childbirth: A Literature Review of Measurement Properties

1. Fowler G, Patterson D. Use of maternity surveys in improving the care experience – a review of the evidence. Br J Midwifery. 2013;21(6):410–415. doi: 10.12968/bjom.2013.21.6.410. FowlerG PattersonD Use of maternity surveys in improving the care experience – a review of the evidence Br J Midwifery 2013 21 6 410 415 10.12968/bjom.2013.21.6.410 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Blazquez AR, Corchon S, Ferrandiz FE. Validity of instruments for measuring the satisfaction of a woman and her partner with care received during labour and childbirth: Systematic review. Midwifery. 2017;55:103–112. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.014. BlazquezAR CorchonS FerrandizFE Validity of instruments for measuring the satisfaction of a woman and her partner with care received during labour and childbirth: Systematic review Midwifery 2017 55 103 112 10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.014 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Perriman N, Davis D. Measuring maternal satisfaction with maternity care: A systematic integrative review. Women Birth. 2016;29(3):293–299. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.12.004. PerrimanN DavisD Measuring maternal satisfaction with maternity care: A systematic integrative review Women Birth 2016 29 3 293 299 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.12.004 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. Sawyer A, Ayers S, Abbott J, Gyte G, Rabe H, Duley L. Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: A comparative review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(1). doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-108. SawyerA AyersS AbbottJ GyteG RabeH DuleyL Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: A comparative review BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013 13 1 10.1186/1471-2393-13-108 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Nilvér H, Begley C, Berg M. Measuring women’s childbirth experiences: A systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1). doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1356-y. NilvérH BegleyC BergM Measuring women’s childbirth experiences: A systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017 17 1 10.1186/s12884-017-1356-y Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, De Vet HCW, Terwee CB. COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) user manual Version 1.0 [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Jan 10]. Available from: https://cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-syst-review-for-PROMs-manual_version-1_feb-2018.pdf MokkinkLB PrinsenCAC PatrickDL AlonsoJ BouterLM De VetHCW TerweeCB COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) user manual Version 1.0 [Internet] 2018 [cited 2023 Jan 10]. Available from: https://cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-syst-review-for-PROMs-manual_version-1_feb-2018.pdf Search in Google Scholar

7. Hosseini Tabaghdehi M, Keramat A, Shahhosseini Z, Kolahdozan S, Moosazadeh M, Motaghi Z. Development and psychometric properties of Iranian women childbirth experience questionnaire. Nursing Open. 2021;8(3):1360–1368. doi: 10.1002/nop2.752. Hosseini TabaghdehiM KeramatA ShahhosseiniZ KolahdozanS MoosazadehM MotaghiZ Development and psychometric properties of Iranian women childbirth experience questionnaire Nursing Open 2021 8 3 1360 1368 10.1002/nop2.752 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Smith LFP. Development of a multidimensional labour satisfaction questionnaire: Dimensions, validity, and internal reliability. Quality Health Care. 2001;10:17–22. SmithLFP Development of a multidimensional labour satisfaction questionnaire: Dimensions, validity, and internal reliability Quality Health Care 2001 10 17 22 Search in Google Scholar

9. Pozo-Cano MD, Martín-Salvador A, Pérez-Morente MÁ, Martínez-García E, Luna del Castillo JD, Gázquez-López M, et al. Validation of the Women’s Views of Birth Labor Satisfaction Questionnaire (WOMBLSQ4) in the Spanish population. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2020;17(15). doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155582. Pozo-CanoMD Martín-SalvadorA Pérez-MorenteMÁ Martínez-GarcíaE Luna del CastilloJD Gázquez-LópezM Validation of the Women’s Views of Birth Labor Satisfaction Questionnaire (WOMBLSQ4) in the Spanish population Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2020 17 15 10.3390/ijerph17155582 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Carquillat P, Vendittelli F, Perneger T, Guittier MJ. Development of a Questionnaire for Assessing the Childbirth Experience (QACE). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1). doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1462-x. CarquillatP VendittelliF PernegerT GuittierMJ Development of a Questionnaire for Assessing the Childbirth Experience (QACE) BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017 17 1 10.1186/s12884-017-1462-x Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

11. Rodríguez Coll P, Casañas R, Collado Palomares A, Maldonado Aubian G, Salgado Poveda MI, Espada-Trespalacios X, et al. Validation and psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Questionnaire for Assessing the Childbirth Experience (QACE). Sexual. 2021;27. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100584. Rodríguez CollP CasañasR Collado PalomaresA Maldonado AubianG Salgado PovedaMI Espada-TrespalaciosX Validation and psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Questionnaire for Assessing the Childbirth Experience (QACE) Sexual 2021 27 10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100584 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Dencker A, Taft C, Bergqvist L, Lilja H, Berg M. Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): Development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10(1). doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-81. DenckerA TaftC BergqvistL LiljaH BergM Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): Development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010 10 1 10.1186/1471-2393-10-81 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

13. Abbaspoor Z, Moghaddam Banaem L, Ronaghi S, Dencker A. Translation and cultural adaptation of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in Iran. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2019;24(4):296–300. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_103_18. AbbaspoorZ Moghaddam BanaemL RonaghiS DenckerA Translation and cultural adaptation of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in Iran Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2019 24 4 296 300 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_103_18 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14. Mamuk R, Şahin N, Dişsiz M. The Turkish Version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ): Reliability and validity assessment. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi. 2019;15(4):265–271. doi: 10.4274/BTDMJB.galenos.2019.20190123082356. MamukR ŞahinN DişsizM The Turkish Version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ): Reliability and validity assessment Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi 2019 15 4 265 271 10.4274/BTDMJB.galenos.2019.20190123082356 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Kazemi S, Dencker A, Pazandeh F, Montazeri A, Sedigh-Mobarakabadi S, Hajian S. Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ). Biomed Res Int. 2020;6879283. doi: 10.1155/2020/6879283.S. KazemiS DenckerA PazandehF MontazeriA Sedigh-MobarakabadiS HajianS Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) Biomed Res Int 2020 6879283 10.1155/2020/6879283.S Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. Patabendige M, Palihawadana TS, Herath RP, Wijesinghe PS. Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in the Sri Lankan setting: Translation, cultural adaptation and validation into the Sinhala language. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13(1). doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05380-z. PatabendigeM PalihawadanaTS HerathRP WijesinghePS Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in the Sri Lankan setting: Translation, cultural adaptation and validation into the Sinhala language BMC Res Notes 2020 13 1 10.1186/s13104-020-05380-z Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17. da Silva Vieira RCM., Ferreira CHJ, de Carvalho Cavalli R, do Prado MLR, Beleza ACS, Driusso P. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20:477. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03163-9. da Silva VieiraRCM FerreiraCHJ de Carvalho CavalliR do PradoMLR BelezaACS DriussoP Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020 20 477 10.1186/s12884-020-03163-9 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Boie S, Lauridsen HH, Glavind J, Smed MK, Uldbjerg N, Bor P. The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ)—validation of its use in a Danish-speaking population of new mothers stimulated with oxytocin during labour. PLoS ONE 2020;15(5):e0233122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233122. BoieS LauridsenHH GlavindJ SmedMK UldbjergN BorP The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ)—validation of its use in a Danish-speaking population of new mothers stimulated with oxytocin during labour PLoS ONE 2020 15 5 e0233122 10.1371/journal.pone.0233122 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Parchaa T, Togoobaatar G, Fukuzawa RK, Chunagsuren B, Tseleejav B, Nyam N, Katsumata AT. Translation and validation of the Mongolian version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire. J Patient Exp. 2021; 8:23743735211060636. doi: 10.1177/23743735211060636. ParchaaT TogoobaatarG FukuzawaRK ChunagsurenB TseleejavB NyamN KatsumataAT Translation and validation of the Mongolian version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire J Patient Exp 2021 8 23743735211060636 10.1177/23743735211060636 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20. Kalok A, Nordin N, Sharip S, Abdul Rahman R, Shah SA, Abdullah Mahdy Z, Kamisan Atan I. Psychometric evaluation of the Malay version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-My). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(13):7644. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137644. KalokA NordinN SharipS Abdul RahmanR ShahSA Abdullah MahdyZ Kamisan AtanI Psychometric evaluation of the Malay version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-My) Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022 19 13 7644 10.3390/ijerph19137644 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

21. Marques MJP, Zangão O, Miranda L, Sim-Sim M. Childbirth Experience Questionnaire: Cross-cultural validation and psychometric evaluation for European Portuguese. Womens Health (Lond). 2022;18:17455057221128121. doi: 10.1177/17455057221128121. MarquesMJP ZangãoO MirandaL Sim-SimM Childbirth Experience Questionnaire: Cross-cultural validation and psychometric evaluation for European Portuguese Womens Health (Lond) 2022 18 17455057221128121 10.1177/17455057221128121 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22. Zhu X, Wang Y, Zhou H, Qiu L, Pang R. Adaptation of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in China: A multisite crosssectional study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(4):e0215373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215373. ZhuX WangY ZhouH QiuL PangR Adaptation of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in China: A multisite crosssectional study PLoS ONE 2019 14 4 e0215373 10.1371/journal.pone.0215373 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

23. Dencker A, Bergqvist L, Berg M, Greenbrook JTV, Nilsson C, Lundgren I. Measuring women’s experiences of decision-making and aspects of midwifery support: A confirmatory factor analysis of the revised Childbirth Experience Questionnaire. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1). doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02869-0. DenckerA BergqvistL BergM GreenbrookJTV NilssonC LundgrenI Measuring women’s experiences of decision-making and aspects of midwifery support: A confirmatory factor analysis of the revised Childbirth Experience Questionnaire BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020 20 1 10.1186/s12884-020-02869-0 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

24. Ghanbari-Homayi S, Dencker A, Fardiazar Z, Jafarabadi M A, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Meedya S, et al. Validation of the Iranian version of the childbirth experience questionnaire 2.0. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1). doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2606-y. Ghanbari-HomayiS DenckerA FardiazarZ JafarabadiMA Mohammad-Alizadeh-CharandabiS MeedyaS Validation of the Iranian version of the childbirth experience questionnaire 2.0 BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019 19 1 10.1186/s12884-019-2606-y Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

25. Walker KF, Dencker A, Thornton JG. Childbirth experience questionnaire 2: Validating its use in the United Kingdom. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019;5:100097. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100097. WalkerKF DenckerA ThorntonJG Childbirth experience questionnaire 2: Validating its use in the United Kingdom Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X 2019 5 100097 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100097 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

26. Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Development and psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery. 2014;30(6):610–619. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.10.006. Hollins MartinCJ MartinCR Development and psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) Midwifery 2014 30 6 610 619 10.1016/j.midw.2013.10.006 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

27. Jefford E, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Development and validation of the Australian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2018;36(1):42–58. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2017.1396302. JeffordE Hollins MartinCJ MartinCR Development and validation of the Australian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) J Reprod Infant Psychol 2018 36 1 42 58 10.1080/02646838.2017.1396302 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

28. Škodová Z, Nepelová Z, Grendár M, Bašková M. Psychometric properties of the Slovak version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale (BSS) and Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery. 2019;79. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102550. ŠkodováZ NepelováZ GrendárM BaškováM Psychometric properties of the Slovak version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale (BSS) and Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) Midwifery 2019 79 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102550 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

29. Romero-Gonzalez B, Peralta-Ramirez MI, Caparros-Gonzalez RA, Cambil-Ledesma A, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Spanish validation and factor structure of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery. 2019;70:31–37. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.12.009. Romero-GonzalezB Peralta-RamirezMI Caparros-GonzalezRA Cambil-LedesmaA Hollins MartinCJ MartinCR Spanish validation and factor structure of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) Midwifery 2019 70 31 37 10.1016/j.midw.2018.12.009 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

30. Skvirsky V, Taubman–ben-ari O, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Validation of the Hebrew Birth Satisfaction Scale – Revised (BSS-R) and its relationship to perceived traumatic labour. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2020;38(2):214–220. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2019.1600666. SkvirskyV Taubman–ben-ariO Hollins MartinCJ MartinCR Validation of the Hebrew Birth Satisfaction Scale – Revised (BSS-R) and its relationship to perceived traumatic labour J Reprod Infant Psychol 2020 38 2 214 220 10.1080/02646838.2019.1600666 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

31. Martin CR, Jefford E, Hollins Martin CJ. Crisis, what crisis? Replicability of the key measurement characteristics of the Australian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale—Revised. Int J Childbirth. 2020;10(3):140–150. doi: 10.1891/IJCBIRTH-D-20-00006. MartinCR JeffordE Hollins MartinCJ Crisis, what crisis? Replicability of the key measurement characteristics of the Australian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale—Revised Int J Childbirth 2020 10 3 140 150 10.1891/IJCBIRTH-D-20-00006 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

32. Nasiri S, Kariman N, Ozgoli G. Psychometric properties of the Iranian version of Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised. J Res Med Sci. 2020;25:90. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_248_19. NasiriS KarimanN OzgoliG Psychometric properties of the Iranian version of Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised J Res Med Sci 2020 25 90 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_248_19 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

33. Nespoli A, Colciago E, Fumagalli S, Locatelli A, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Validation and factor structure of the Italian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2021;39(5):516–531. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2020.1836333. NespoliA ColciagoE FumagalliS LocatelliA Hollins MartinCJ MartinCR Validation and factor structure of the Italian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) J Reprod Infant Psychol 2021 39 5 516 531 10.1080/02646838.2020.1836333 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

34. Omani-Samani R, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR, Maroufizadeh S, Ghaheri A, Navid B. The Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised Indicator (BSS-RI): A validation study in Iranian mothers. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021:34(11):1827–1831. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1651265. Omani-SamaniR Hollins MartinCJ MartinCR MaroufizadehS GhaheriA NavidB The Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised Indicator (BSS-RI): A validation study in Iranian mothers J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2021 34 11 1827 1831 10.1080/14767058.2019.1651265 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

35. Mortazavi F, Mehrabadi M, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Psychometric properties of the birth satisfaction scale-revised (BSS-R) in a sample of postpartum Iranian women. Health Care Women Int. 2021;42(4–6):836–851. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2020.1802464. MortazaviF MehrabadiM Hollins MartinCJ MartinCR Psychometric properties of the birth satisfaction scale-revised (BSS-R) in a sample of postpartum Iranian women Health Care Women Int 2021 42 4–6 836 851 10.1080/07399332.2020.1802464 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

36. Zafar S, Tayyab F, Liaqat A, Sikander S, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Translation and validation of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised in Urdu for use in Pakistan. Int J Childbirth. 2021;11(2):72–83. doi: 10.1891/IJCBIRTH-D-21-00001. ZafarS TayyabF LiaqatA SikanderS Hollins MartinCJ MartinCR Translation and validation of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised in Urdu for use in Pakistan Int J Childbirth 2021 11 2 72 83 10.1891/IJCBIRTH-D-21-00001 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

37. Emmens B, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2021;1–15. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2021.1979200. EmmensB Hollins MartinCJ MartinCR Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) J Reprod Infant Psychol 2021 1 15 10.1080/02646838.2021.1979200 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

38. Radoš NS, Matijaš M, Brekalo M, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Further validation of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised: Factor structure, validity, and reliability. Curr Psychol. 2022; 42:13693–13702. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02688-2. RadošNS MatijašM BrekaloM Hollins MartinCJ MartinCR Further validation of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised: Factor structure, validity, and reliability Curr Psychol 2022 42 13693 13702 10.1007/s12144-021-02688-2 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

39. Anikwe Ch, Osita US, Mbanefo OP, Asiegbu OGK, Nnadozie UU, Eleje GU, et al. The Birth Satisfaction Scale: Igbo adaptation, validation, and reliability study. Qeios ID: GOVO55, 2022. doi:10.32388/GOVO55.2. AnikweCh OsitaUS MbanefoOP AsiegbuOGK NnadozieUU ElejeGU The Birth Satisfaction Scale: Igbo adaptation, validation, and reliability study Qeios ID GOVO55 2022 10.32388/GOVO55.2 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

40. Özdemir Gökmen Ö, Erbil N, Demirbağ B. Adaptation of Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised to Turkish society. Middle Black Sea J Health Scien. 2022;8(4):490–505. doi: 10.19127/mbsjohs.1080337. Özdemir GökmenÖ ErbilN DemirbağB Adaptation of Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised to Turkish society Middle Black Sea J Health Scien 2022 8 4 490 505 10.19127/mbsjohs.1080337 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

41. Ratislavová K, Hendrych Lorenzová E, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Translation and validation of the Czech Republic version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2022;1–17. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2022.2067837. RatislavováK Hendrych LorenzováE Hollins MartinCJ MartinCR Translation and validation of the Czech Republic version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) J Reprod Infant Psychol 2022 1 17 10.1080/02646838.2022.2067837 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

42. WHO. Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience: WHO recommendations. Geneva: World Health Organization [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 July 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550215 WHO Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience: WHO recommendations Geneva World Health Organization [Internet] 2018 [cited 2023 July 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550215 Search in Google Scholar

43. Nijagal MA, Wissig S, Stowell C, Olson E, Amer-Wahlin I, Bonsel G, et al. Standardized outcome measures for pregnancy and childbirth, ICHOM proposal. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1). doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3732-3. NijagalMA WissigS StowellC OlsonE Amer-WahlinI BonselG Standardized outcome measures for pregnancy and childbirth, ICHOM proposal BMC Health Serv Res 2018 18 1 10.1186/s12913-018-3732-3 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

44. Hollins Martin CJ, Martinez LJ, Martin CR. Measuring women’s experiences of childbirth using the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Br J Midwifery. 2020;28(5):306–312. doi: 10.12968/bjom.2020.28.5.306. Hollins MartinCJ MartinezLJ MartinCR Measuring women’s experiences of childbirth using the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) Br J Midwifery 2020 28 5 306 312 10.12968/bjom.2020.28.5.306 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

45. Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. The Birth Satisfaction Consortium [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 July 20]. Available from: https://www.bss-r.co.uk/about/ Hollins MartinCJ MartinCR The Birth Satisfaction Consortium [Internet] 2023 [cited 2023 July 20]. Available from: https://www.bss-r.co.uk/about/ Search in Google Scholar

46. Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, de Vet HCW, Terwee CB. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147–1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. PrinsenCAC MokkinkLB BouterLM AlonsoJ PatrickDL de VetHCW TerweeCB COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures Qual Life Res 2018 27 5 1147 1157 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

47. Kahalon R, Preis H, Benyamini Y. Who benefits most from skin-to-skin mother-infant contact after birth? Survey findings on skin-to-skin and birth satisfaction by mode of birth. Midwifery. 2021;92. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102862. KahalonR PreisH BenyaminiY Who benefits most from skin-to-skin mother-infant contact after birth? Survey findings on skin-to-skin and birth satisfaction by mode of birth Midwifery 2021 92 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102862 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar