Fear of Relationship Loss: Attachment Style as a Vulnerability Factor in Job Burnout
and | Jun 25, 2020
About this article
Article Category: Original scientific article
Published Online: Jun 25, 2020
Page range: 146 - 154
Received: Feb 11, 2020
Accepted: May 19, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2020-0019
Keywords
© 2020 Andreja Pšeničny et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Figure 1
Relative influence of predictors on the functions’ values (standardised coefficients) and the correlation between the “ASTYLES” variables and functions (structural matrix).
| −0.42 | −0.92 | 0.15 | −0.38 | 0.92 | −0.05 | |
| 0.88 | 0.35 | −0.61 | 0.34 | 0.31 | −0.85 | |
| 0.94 | 0.40 | 0.47 | 0.57 | 0.12 | 0.78 | |
| −0.03 | 0.06 | 0.27 | −0.00 | −0.01 | 0.41 | |
Descriptive statistics (mean scores and standard deviations) for performance-based self-esteem, workaholism and burnout by burnout risk group (ABSRi), and the results of the one-way analysis of variance.
| Relaxed | 19.16 | 5.60 | 1,489.78 | 0.00 | |
| Challenged | 41.55 | 10.50 | |||
| Wornout | 20.49 | 4.47 | |||
| Burnout | 43.82 | 9.11 | |||
| Relaxed | 39.24 | 8.91 | 712.45 | 0.00 | |
| Challenged | 63.37 | 17.46 | |||
| Wornout | 44.50 | 7.22 | |||
| Burnout | 67.47 | 13.75 | |||
| Relaxed | .03 | .08 | 1,686.04 | 0.00 | |
| Challenged | .03 | .02 | |||
| Wornout | .81 | .29 | |||
| Burnout | 1.29 | .60 | |||
Comparison of the percentage of participants with secure and insecure attachment styles (ASTYLES variable) between burnout risk groups (ABSRi variable).
| Relaxed | N | 446 | 56 | 34 | 296 | |
| % | 6.7% | 4.1% | 35.6% | |||
| Challenged | N | 53 | 49 | 102 | 54 | |
| % | 20.5% | 19.0% | 20.9% | |||
| Wornout | N | 193 | 48 | 15 | 72 | |
| % | 14.6% | 4.6% | 22.0% | |||
| Burnout | N | 30 | 295 | 488 | 89 | |
| % | 3.3% | 9.9% | ||||
Testing the equality of centroids by burnout class (ABSCl).
| 0.12 | 4,921.07 | 12 | 0.00 | |
| 0.80 | 507.64 | 6 | 0.00 | |
| 0.95 | 11.53 | 2 | 0.00 |
Descriptive statistics for the testing results (mean scores and standard deviations).
| 0.65 | 0.72 | |
| 34.21 | 14.09 | |
| 56.59 | 17.98 | |
| 4.12 | 2.19 | |
| 3.29 | 2.05 | |
| 3.63 | 2.24 | |
| 3.59 | 2.01 |
Frequencies, descriptive statistics and differences in test scores by category “low level” and “high level” for burnout, performance-based self-esteem and workaholism.
| Low | 1,130 | 0.06 | 0.11 | −66.19 | 1778.04 | ||
| High | 1,190 | 1.22 | 0.58 | ||||
| Low | 431 | 1.69 | 0.41 | −60.15 | 120.50 | ||
| High | 2,694 | 3.74 | 0.66 | ||||
| Low | 335 | 37.84 | 7.28 | −41.21 | 133.521 | ||
| High | 1,225 | 67.85 | 12.77 |
Summary of one-way repeated measures analysis of variance: attachment style mean score (ASTYLES variable) by group (relaxed, challenged, wornout and burnout; (ABSRi variable).
| | 464.632 | 3 | 154.877 | 56.215 | |
| | 6,380.744 | 2,316 | 2.755 | ||
| | 1,482.684 | 2.627 | 564.354 | 108.028 | |
| | 3321.341 | 7.882 | 421.400 | 80.664 | |
| | 31,787.110 | 6,084.654 | 5.224 |
Burnout risk groups.
| Relaxed | Challenged | |
| Wornout | Burnout | |
Percentages of appropriately classified members of individual burnout risk groups.
| Relaxed | 4.1% | 9.6% | 0.0 | ||
| Challenged | 0.0 | 8.9% | 0.0 | ||
| Wornout | 0.0 | 10.7% | 0.0 | ||
| Burnout | 0.0 | 15.9% | 2.7% | ||
Participant classification into burnout risk groups (ABSRi variable).
| Relaxed | Wornout | |
| 832 (35.9%) | 328 (14.1%) | |
| Challenged | Burnout | |
| 258 (11.1%) | 902 (38.9%) |