Factors of collective psychological empowerment of active users in the online health community med.over.net

1. Uporaba informacijsko - komunikacijske tehnologije v gospodinjstvih in pri posameznikih Slovenija: končni podatki.Ljubljana: Statistični urad Republike Slovenije, 2012. Pridobljeno5. 12. 2012 s spletne strani: http://www.stat.si/.Search in Google Scholar

2. Klemenc-Ketiš Z, Kersnik J. Seeking health advice on the Internet in patients with health problems: a cross-sectional population study in Slovenia. Inform Health Soc Care 2013; 3: 280-90.10.3109/17538157.2013.76430623514043Search in Google Scholar

3. Demiris G. The diffusion of virtual communities in health care: concepts and challenges. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 62: 178-88.10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.00316406472Search in Google Scholar

4. Fox S. Medicine 2.0: peer-to-peer healthcare: report.Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Research Center, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

5. Preece J. Empathic communities: reaching out across the web.Interactions 1998; 2: 32-43.10.1145/274430.274435Search in Google Scholar

6. Tanis M. Online social support groups. In Joinson A, McKenna KYA, Postmes T, Reips UD, editors. Oxford handbook of internet psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007: 137-52.Search in Google Scholar

7. Barak A, Boniel-Nissim M, Suler J. Fostering empowerment in online support groups. Comput Hum Behav 2008; 24: 1867-83.10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.004Search in Google Scholar

8. Santana S, Lausen B, Bujnowska-Fedak M, Chronaki CE, Prokosch H-U, Wynn R. Informed citizen and empowered citizen in health: results from an European survey. BMC Fam Pract 2011; 12: 20-35.10.1186/1471-2296-12-20310111821496309Search in Google Scholar

9. Coulson NS, Malik S. Health-related online support communities.Search in Google Scholar

In: Yan Z, editor. Encyclopedia of cyber-behaviour. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2012: 671-88.Search in Google Scholar

10. Bartlett K, Coulson NS. An investigation into the empowerment effects of using online support groups and how this affects doctor/patient communication. Patient Educ Couns 2011; 83: 113-9.10.1016/j.pec.2010.05.02920599338Search in Google Scholar

11. Seckin G. Informational and decisional empowerment in online health support communities: initial psychometric validation of the Cyber Info-Decisional Empowerment Scale (CIDES) and preliminary data from administration of the scale. Support Care Cancer 2011; 19: 2057-61.10.1007/s00520-011-1249-y21858718Search in Google Scholar

12. Bridges J, Loukanova S, Carrera P. Patient empowerment in health care. In: Heggenhougen K, Quah S, editors. International encyclopedia of public health, Vol. 5. San Diego: Academic Press, 2008: 17-28.Search in Google Scholar

13. van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CHC, Taal E, Seydel ER, van de Laar MAJF. Self-reported differences in empowerment between lurkers and posters in online patient support groups. J Med Internet Res 2008; 10: e18. doi:10.2196/jmir.992.10.2196/jmir.992248392518653442Search in Google Scholar

14. Lemire M, Sicotte C, Paré G. Internet use and the logics of personal empowerment in health. Health Policy 2008; 88: 130-40.10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.03.00618436330Search in Google Scholar

15. Menon ST. Toward a model of psychological health empowerment: implications for health care in multicultural communities. Nurse Educ Today 2002; 22: 28-39.10.1054/nedt.2001.072111886225Search in Google Scholar

16. Sharf BF. Communicating breast cancer on-line: support and empowerment on the internet. Women Health 1997; 26: 65-84.10.1300/J013v26n01_05Search in Google Scholar

17. van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CHC, Taal E, Shaw BR, Seydel ER, van de Laar MAJF. Empowering processes and outcomes of participation in online support groups for patients with breast cancer, arthritis, or fibromyalgia. Qual Health Res 2008; 18: 405-17.10.1177/1049732307313429Search in Google Scholar

18. Speer PW. Intrapersonal and interactional empowerment: implication for theory. J Community Psychol 2000; 28: 51-61.10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(200001)28:1<51::AID-JCOP6>3.0.CO;2-6Search in Google Scholar

19. Zimmerman MA. Psychological empowerment: issues and illustrations. Am J Community Psychol 1995; 23: 581-99.10.1007/BF02506983Search in Google Scholar

20. Speer PW, Hughey J. Community organizing: an ecological route to empowerment and power. Am J Community Psychol 1995; 23: 729-48.10.1007/BF02506989Search in Google Scholar

21. Boehm A, Staples LH. Empowerment: the point of view of consumers. Fam Soc 2004; 85: 270-80.10.1606/1044-3894.314Search in Google Scholar

22. Radin P. ‘‘To me, it’s my life’’: medical communication, trust, and activism in cyberspace. Soc Sci Med 2006; 62: 591-601.10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.022Search in Google Scholar

23. Mlinar S. Perceptions of empowerment among part-time nursing students. Zdrav Var 2012; 51: 69-74.10.2478/v10152-012-0008-xSearch in Google Scholar

24. Hur MH. Empowerment in terms of theoretical perspectives: exploring a typology of the process and components across disciplines. J Community Psychol 2006; 34: 523-40.10.1002/jcop.20113Search in Google Scholar

25. McMillan DW, Chavis DM. Sense of community: a definition and theory. J Community Psychol 1986; 14: 6-23.10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-ISearch in Google Scholar

26. Peterson NA, Lowe JB, Aquilino ML, Schnider JE. Linking social cohesion and interactional empowerment: support and new implications for theory. J Community Psychol 2005; 33: 233-44.10.1002/jcop.20047Search in Google Scholar

27. Blanchard AL, Welbourne JA, Boughton MA. A model of online trust: the mediating role of norms and sense of virtual community.Inform Commun Society 2011; 14: 76-106.10.1080/13691181003739633Search in Google Scholar

28. Stavrositu C, Sundar SS. Does blogging empower women? Exploring the role of agency and community. J Comput Mediat Comm 2012; 17: 369-86.10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01587.xSearch in Google Scholar

29. Michinov N, Michinov E, Toczek-Capelle MC. Social identity, group processes, and performance in synchronous computermediated communication. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 2004; 8: 27-39.10.1037/1089-2699.8.1.27Search in Google Scholar

30. Matzat U. A theory of relational signals in online groups. New Media Soc 2009; 11: 375-94.10.1177/1461444808101617Search in Google Scholar

31. Tanis M. Health-related online forums: what’s the big attraction.J Health Commun 2008; 13: 698-714.10.1080/1081073080241531618958781Search in Google Scholar

32. Verovšek A, Cimerman P. Predstavitev Med.over.net na prireditvi ob 10. letnici delovanja portala na Med.Over.Net.Ljubljana, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

33. Ip EJ, Barnett MJ, Tenerowicz MJ, Perry PJ. The touro 12-step: a systematic guide to optimizing survey research with online discussion boards. J Med Internet Res 2010; 12: e16.10.2196/jmir.1314295622720507843Search in Google Scholar

34. Blanchard AL. Testing a model of sense of virtual community.Comput Hum Behav 2008; 24: 2107-23.10.1016/j.chb.2007.10.002Search in Google Scholar

35. Kraut RE, Resnick P, Kiesler S, Ren Y, Chen Y, Burke M et al.Building successful online communities: evidence-based social design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2012.10.7551/mitpress/8472.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

36. Obst PL, Stafurik J. Online we are all able bodied: online psychological sense of community and social support found through membership of disability-specific websites promotes well-being for people living with a physical disability. J Community Appl Soc 2010; 20: 525-31.10.1002/casp.1067Search in Google Scholar

37. Basu A, Dutta MJ. The relationships between health information seeking and community participation: the roles of health information orientation and efficacy. Health Commun 2008; 23: 70-9.10.1080/1041023070180712118443994Search in Google Scholar

38. Vehovar V, Sicherl P, Hüsing T, Dolničar V. Methodological challenges of digital divide measurements. Inf Soc; 2006: 279-90.10.1080/01972240600904076Search in Google Scholar

39. Dolničar V. Merjenje dinamike digitalnega razkoraka. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

40. Vehovar V, Travar J. RIS 2008: e-Zdravje in e- Farmacija (#84).Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

41. Mo PKH, Coulson NS. Developing a model for online support group use, empowering processes and psychosocial outcomes for individuals living with HIV/AIDS. Psychol Health 2012; 27: 445-59.10.1080/08870446.2011.59298121854088Search in Google Scholar

42. Welbourne JL, Blanchard AL, Wadsworth MB. Motivations in virtual health communities and their relationship to community, connectedness and stress. Comput Hum Behav 2013; 29: 129-39.10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.024Search in Google Scholar

43. van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CHC, Taal E, Seydel ER, van de Laar MAFJ. Participation in online patient support groups endorses patients’ empowerment. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 74: 61-910.1016/j.pec.2008.07.04418778909Search in Google Scholar

44. Walther JB. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: a relational perspective. Commun Res 1992; 19: 52-90.10.1177/009365092019001003Search in Google Scholar

45. Fox S, Duggan M. Health online 2013: report. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Research Center, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

46. Černigoj Sadar N. Delovanje neformalnih socialnih omrežij pri zadovoljevanju potreb družin. In: Novak M, Černigoj Sadar N, Dragoš S, Ferligoj A, Hlebec V, Kogovšek T, Nagode M, editors.Omrežja socialne opore Slovencev, Ljubljana: Inštitut Republike Slovenije za socialno varstvo, 2004: 133-42.Search in Google Scholar

47. Lozar Manfreda K, Bosnjak M, Berzelak J, Haas I, Vehovar V. Web surveys versus other survey modes: a meta-analysis comparing response rates. Int J Market Res 2008; 50: 79-104.10.1177/147078530805000107Search in Google Scholar

48. Ule M, Kamin T. Družbeni dejavniki neenakosti v zdravju. Zdrav Var 2012; 51: 1-4. Search in Google Scholar