Deontic Relationship in the Context of Jan Woleński’s Metaethical Naturalism

1. Carmo, J., and A. Jones. Deontic logic and contrary-to-duties, In D. M. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 8, Springer Science+Business Media, 2002, pp. 147-264.10.1007/978-94-010-0387-2_4Search in Google Scholar

2. Epstein, R. Relatedness and implication, Philosophical Studies 36 (2), 1979, pp. 137-173.10.1007/BF00354267Search in Google Scholar

3. Epstein, R. (with the assistance and collaboration of: W. Carnielli, I. D’Ottaviano, S. Krajewski, R. Maddux). The Semantic Foundations of Logic. Volume 1. Propositional Logics, Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

4. Fagin, R., and J. Y. Halpern. Belief, awareness, and limited reasoning, Artificial Intelligence 34, 1988, pp. 39-76.10.1016/0004-3702(87)90003-8Search in Google Scholar

5. Hilpinen, R. Deontic logic, In L. Goble (ed.), Blackwell guide to philosophical logic, Oxford: Blackwell Publisher Ltd., 2001, pp. 159-182.10.1111/b.9780631206934.2001.00011.xSearch in Google Scholar

6. Hilpinen, R., and P. McNamara. Deontic logic. A historical survey and introduction, In D. Gabbay, J. Horty, X. Parent, R. van der Meyden and L. van der Torre (eds.), Handbook of Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, London: College Publications, 2013, pp. 3-136.Search in Google Scholar

7. Hintikka, J. Deontic logic and its philosophical morals, In J. Hintikka, Models for Modalities, Dordrecht: Springer, 1969, pp. 184-214.10.1007/978-94-010-1711-4_9Search in Google Scholar

8. Jadacki, J. J. The Polish 20th century philosophers’ contribution to the theory of imperatives and norms, European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 7 (2), 2011, pp. 106-145.Search in Google Scholar

9. Jarmużek, T. Relating semantics as fine-grained semantics for intensional propositional logics, In A. Giordani and J. Malinowski (eds.), Logic in High Definition. Current Issues in Logical Semantics, London: Springer 2020, pp. 19-3610.1007/978-3-030-53487-5_2Search in Google Scholar

10. Jarmużek, T., and B. Kaczkowski, On some logic with a relation imposed on formulae. Tableau system F, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 43 (1/2), 2014, pp. 53-72.Search in Google Scholar

11. Jarmużek, T., and M. Klonowski, On logic of strictly-deontic modalities. A semantic and tableau Approach, Logic and Logical Philosophy 29 (3), 2020, pp. 335-380.10.12775/LLP.2020.010Search in Google Scholar

12. Jarmużek, T., and M. Klonowski. Some intensional logics defined by relating semantics and tableau systems, In A. Giordani and J. Malinowski (eds.), Logic in High Definition. Current Issues in Logical Semantics, London: Springer, 2020, pp. 37-54.10.1007/978-3-030-53487-5_3Search in Google Scholar

13. Jörgensen, J. Imperatives and logic, Erkenntnis 7, 1937, pp. 288-296.10.1007/BF00666538Search in Google Scholar

14. Opałek, K. Argumenty za nielingwistyczną koncepcją normy. Uwagi dyskusyjne, Studia Prawnicze 3–4, 1985, pp. 205-218.Search in Google Scholar

15. Opałek, K., and J. Woleński. Logika i interpretacja powinności, Krakowskie Studia Prawnicze 21, 1988, pp. 13-29.Search in Google Scholar

16. Searle, J. How to derive ought from is, Philosophical Review 73 (1), 1964, pp. 43-58.10.2307/2183201Search in Google Scholar

17. Woleński, J. Spór o znaczenie normatywne, In Naturalistyczne i antynaturalistyczne interpretacje humanistyki, Poznań: Wydawnictwo UAM, 1966, pp. 3-14.Search in Google Scholar

18. Woleński, J. Z zagadnień analitycznej filozofii prawa, Warszawa, Kraków: PWN, 1980 (Wydanie drugie, zmienione i rozszerzone: Kraków, Wydawnictwo Aureus, 2012).Search in Google Scholar

19. Woleński, J. Naturalizm, antynaturalizm i metaetyka, Folia Philosophica 29, 2011, pp. 241-256.Search in Google Scholar

20. Woleński, J. Próba naturalistycznej interpretacji norm i ocen, Etyka 50, 2015, pp. 29-47.10.14394/etyka.485Search in Google Scholar

21. Woleński, J. Wykłady o naturalizmie, Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu, 2016.Search in Google Scholar