Reism, Concretism and Schopenhauer Diagrams

1. Ajdukiewicz, K., Elementy teorii poznaniaʻ Tadeusza Kotarbińskiego, In T. Kotarbiński, Elementy teori poznania, logiki formalnej i metodologii nauk, Wrocław, Warszawa, Kraków: Zakład Narodowy imienia Ossolińskich, 1961, pp. 607-631.Search in Google Scholar

2. Bellucci, F. Observational Advantages: A Philosophical Discussion, In P. Chapman, G. Stapleton, A. Moktefi, S. Perez-Kriz and F. Bellucci (eds.), Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (vol. 10871), Cham: Springer, 2018, pp. 330-335.Search in Google Scholar

3. Beiser, F. C. Weltschmerz. Pessimism in German Philosophy, 1860-1900, Oxford: University Press, 2016.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198768715.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

4. Birnbacher, D. Schopenhauer und die Tradition der Sprachkritik, Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch (99), 2018, 37-56.Search in Google Scholar

5. Demey, L. From Euler Diagrams in Schopenhauer to Aristotelian Diagrams in Logical Geometry, In J. Lemanski (ed.), Language, Logic, and Mathematics in Schopenhauer, Basel: Birkhäuser (Springer), 2020, pp. 181–206.10.1007/978-3-030-33090-3_12Search in Google Scholar

6. Dobrzański, M. Begriff und Methode bei Arthur Schopenhauer, Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

7. Dobrzański, M. Problems in Reconstructing Schopenhauer’s Theory of Meaning: With Reference to His Influence on Wittgenstein, In J. Lemanski. (ed.), Language, Logic, and Mathematics in Schopenhauer, Basel: Birkhäuser (Springer), 2020, pp. 25-45.Search in Google Scholar

8. Dobrzański, M., and J. Lemanski. Schopenhauer Diagrams for Conceptual Analysis, In A.-V. Pietarinen, Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. 11th International Conference, Diagrams 2020 Tallinn, Estonia, August 24–28, 2020, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (vol. 12169), Cham: Springer, 2020, pp. 281-288.Search in Google Scholar

9. Fine, K. The Limits of Abstraction, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

10. Garewicz, J. Schopenhauer, Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

11. Hauswald, R. Umfangslogik und analytisches Urteil bei Kant, Kant-Studien (101), 2010, pp. 283-308.10.1515/kant.2010.019Search in Google Scholar

12. Juhos, B. Inwieweit ist Schopenhauer der Kantischen Ethik gerecht geworden? Wien: Phil. Diss., 1926.Search in Google Scholar

13. Kleszcz, R. Criticism and Rationality in the Lvov-Warsaw School, In D. Kubok (ed.), Thinking Critically: What Does It Mean? The Tradition of Philosophical Criticism and Its Forms in the European History of Ideas, Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2018, pp. 161-172.10.1515/9783110567472-011Search in Google Scholar

14. Koßler, M. Die eine Anschauung – der eine Gedanke. Zur Systemfrage bei Fichte und Schopenhauer, In L. Hühn (ed.), Die Ethik Arthur Schopenhauers im Ausgang vom Deutschen Idealismus (Fichte/Schelling), Würzburg: Ergon, 2006, pp. 349-364.Search in Google Scholar

15. Koßler, M. Language as an ‘Indispensable Tool and Organ’ of Reason: Intuition, Concept and Word in Schopenhauer, In J. Lemanski (ed.), Language, Logic, and Mathematics in Schopenhauer, Basel: Birkhäuser (Springer), 2020, pp. 15-24.Search in Google Scholar

16. Kotarbiński, T. Reism: Issues and Prospects, Logique et Analyse 11 (44), 1968, pp. 441-458.Search in Google Scholar

17. Kotarbiński, T. Przedmowa, In A. Schopenhauer, Erystyka czyli sztuka prowadzenia sporów, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie, 1973.Search in Google Scholar

18. Lemanski, J. Schopenhauers Gebrauchstheorie der Bedeutung und das Kontextprinzip: Eine Parallele zu Wittgensteins 〉Philosophischen Untersuchungen〈, Schopenhauer Jahrbuch (97), 2016, pp. 171-195.Search in Google Scholar

19. Lemanski, J. Means or End? On the Valuation of Logic Diagrams, Logiko-filosofskie studii (14), 2016, pp. 98–122.Search in Google Scholar

20. Moktefi, A. Schopenhauer’s Eulerian diagrams, In J. Lemanski (ed.), Language, Logic, and Mathematics in Schopenhauer, Basel: Birkhäuser (Springer), 2020, pp. 111-128.10.1007/978-3-030-33090-3_8Search in Google Scholar

21. McLaughlin, P., and O. Schlaudt. Kant’s Antinomies of Pure Reason and the ‘Hexagon of Predicate Negation’, Logica Universalis (14), 2020, pp. 51-67.10.1007/s11787-020-00240-7Search in Google Scholar

22. Schlick, M. Nietzsche und Schopenhauer, In M. Schlick (ed. Iven, M.), Gesamtausgabe: Abteilung II: Nachgelassene Schriften, vol. 5.1, Wien, New York: Springer, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

23. Schopenhauer, A. Philosophische Vorlesungen. Vol. I, In A. Schopenhauer (ed. P. Deussen and F. Mockrauer), Schopenhauers sämtliche Werke. Vol. IX., München: Piper, 1913.Search in Google Scholar

24. Schopenhauer, A. Philosophische Vorlesungen. Vol. II, In A. Schopenhauer (ed. P. Deussen and F. Mockrauer), Schopenhauers sämtliche Werke. Vol. X., München: Piper, 1913.Search in Google Scholar

25. Schopenhauer, A. The World as Will and Representation. Vol. 1., translated and edited by Judith Norman, Alistair Welchman and Christopher Janaway, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

26. Schopenhauer, A. Der handschriftliche Nachlass: Bd. III. Berliner Manuskripte (1818-1830), ed. by A. Hübscher, Frankfurt a.M.: W. Kramer, 1970.Search in Google Scholar

27. Schopenhauer, A. Parerga and Paralipomena. Vol. 2., transl. by A. Del Caro, C. Janaway, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.10.1017/9781139029636Search in Google Scholar

28. Stapleton, G., Jamnik, M., and A. Shimojima. What Makes an Effective Representation of Information: A Formal Account of Observational Advantages, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 26 (5), 2017, pp. 143-177.10.1007/s10849-017-9250-6Search in Google Scholar

29. Tennant, N. A General Theory of Abstraction Operators, The Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214), 2004, pp. 105-133.10.1111/j.0031-8094.2004.00344.xSearch in Google Scholar

30. Woleński, J. The History of Epistemology, In I. Niiniluoto, M. Sintonen and J. Wolenski (eds.) Handbook of Epistemology, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 2004, pp. 3-54.10.1007/978-1-4020-1986-9_1Search in Google Scholar

31. Woleński, J. Reism, In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2012 Edition), URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/reism/ (11.05.2020).Search in Google Scholar

32. Xhignesse, M.-A. Schopenhauer’s Perceptive Invective, In J. Lemanski (ed.), Language, Logic, and Mathematics in Schopenhauer, Basel: Birkhäuser (Springer), 2020, pp. 95-109.10.1007/978-3-030-33090-3_7Search in Google Scholar

33. Zaręba, M. Reizm Tadeusza Kotarbińskiego a prakseologiczna koncepcja sprawstwa, Przegląd Filozoficzny – Nowa Seria 3 (83), 2012, pp. 559-575.Search in Google Scholar