Moral Considerability and Decision-Making

1. Goodpaster, K. On Being Morally Considerable, Journal of Philosophy 75 (6), 1978, pp. 308-325.10.2307/2025709Search in Google Scholar

2. Hale, B. Moral Considerability: Deontological, Not Metaphysical, Ethics & the Environment 16 (2), 2011, pp. 37-62.10.2979/ethicsenviro.16.2.37Search in Google Scholar

3. Light, A., Holmes Rolston III. Introduction: Ethics and Environmental Ethics, In A. Light, Holmes Rolston III (eds.), Environmental Ethics. An Anthology, Malden (MA): Blackwell Publishing, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

4. Sessions, G. Ecocentrism and the Anthropocentric Detour, In G. Sessions (ed.), Deep Ecology for the twenty-first Century: Readings on the Philosophy and Practice of the New Environmentalism, Boston: Shambhala Publications, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

5. Crutzen, P. J. Geology of Mankind, Nature 415 (6867), 2002.10.1038/415023a11780095Search in Google Scholar

6. Crutzen, P. J., Stoermer, E. F. The ‘Anthropocen,’ Global Change Newsletter 41, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

7. Lemmens, P, Blok, V., Zwier, J. Toward a Terrestrial Turn in Philosophy of Technology, Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 21 (2-3), 2017.10.5840/techne2017212/363Search in Google Scholar

8. Blok, V. Earthing Technology: Towards an Eco-centric Concept of Biomimetic Technologies in the Anthropocene, Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 21 (2-3), 2017, pp. 127-49.10.5840/techne201752363Search in Google Scholar

9. Bennett, J. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things, Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.10.1215/9780822391623Search in Google Scholar

10. Leopold, A. A Sand County Almanac: And Sketches Here and There, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.Search in Google Scholar

11. Singer, P. Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals, New York: Avon, 1975.Search in Google Scholar

12. Taylor, P. Respect for Nature, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.Search in Google Scholar

13. Naess, A., Sessions, G. Platform Principles of the Deep Ecology Movement, In A. Drengson, Y. Inoue (eds.), The Deep Ecology Movement. An Introductory Anthology, Berkeley: North Atlantic Books, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

14. Brennan, A. Thinking about Nature. An Investigation of Nature, Value and Ecology, Athens: The University of Georgia Press, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

15. Gorke, M. The Death of Our Planet's Species: A Challenge To Ecology And Ethics, trans. By P. Nevers, Washington, DC: Washington Island Press, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

16. Birch, T. Moral Considerability and Universal Consideration, Environmental Ethics 15 (4), 1993, pp. 313-332.10.5840/enviroethics19931544Search in Google Scholar

17. Floridi, L. Information Ethics, its Nature and Scope, In J. van den Hoven, J. Weckert (eds.), Information Technology and Moral Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.10.1017/CBO9780511498725.004Search in Google Scholar

18. Gunkel, D. The Machine Question Critical Perspectives on AI, Robots, and Ethics, Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 2012.10.7551/mitpress/8975.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

19. Hayward, T. Universal Consideration as a Deontological Principle: A Critique of Birch, Environmental Ethics 18 (1), 1996, pp. 55-63.10.5840/enviroethics199618141Search in Google Scholar

20. Weston, A. Universal consideration as an originary practice, Environmental Ethics 20 (3), 1998, pp. 279-289.10.5840/enviroethics199820319Search in Google Scholar

21. Singer, P. Practical Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

22. Bernstein, M. On moral considerability. An essay on who morally matters, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

23. Gare, A. Ethics, Philosophy and the Environment, Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 14 (3), 2018. pp. 219-240.Search in Google Scholar