The Knobe Effect From the Perspective of Normative Orders

1. Adams, F., and A. Steadman. Intentional Action and Moral Considerations: Still Pragmatic, Analysis 64 (3), 2004, pp. 268-76.10.1093/analys/64.3.268Search in Google Scholar

2. Adams, F., and A. Steadman. Intentional Action in Ordinary Language: Core Concept or Pragmatic Understanding? Analysis 64 (2), 2004, pp. 173-81.10.1093/analys/64.2.173Search in Google Scholar

3. Butler, R. J. Report on Analysis “Problem” no. 16. Analysis 38 (3), 1978, pp. 113-4.10.1093/analys/38.3.113aSearch in Google Scholar

4. Guglielmo, S., and B. F. Malle. Can Unintended Side Effects Be Intentional? Resolving a Controversy Over Intentionality and Morality, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36 (12), 2010, pp. 1635-47.10.1177/014616721038673321051767Search in Google Scholar

5. Harman, G. Practical Reasoning, The Review of Metaphysics 29 (3), 1976, pp. 431-63.Search in Google Scholar

6. Hindriks, F. Control, Intentional Action, and Moral Responsibility, Philosophical Psychology 24 (6), 2011, pp. 787-801.10.1080/09515089.2011.562647Search in Google Scholar

7. Hindriks, F. Intentional Action and the Praise Blame Asymmetry, Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233), 2008, pp. 630-41.10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.551.xSearch in Google Scholar

8. Holton, R. Norms and the Knobe Effect, Analysis 70 (3), 2010, pp. 417-24.10.1093/analys/anq037Search in Google Scholar

9. Knobe, J. Intention, Intentional Action and Moral Considerations, Analysis 64 (2), 2004, pp. 181-7.10.1093/analys/64.2.181Search in Google Scholar

10. Knobe, J. Intentional Action and Side Effects in Ordinary Language, Analysis 63 (3), 2003, pp. 190-4.10.1093/analys/63.3.190Search in Google Scholar

11. Knobe, J. The Concept of Intentional Action: A Case Study in the Uses of Folk Psychology, Philosophical Studies 130 (2), 2006, pp. 203-31.10.1007/s11098-004-4510-0Search in Google Scholar

12. Leslie, A. M., J. Knobe, and A. Cohen. Acting Intentionally and the Side-Effect Effect, Psychological Science 17 (5), 2006, pp. 421-7.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01722.x16683930Search in Google Scholar

13. Malle, B. F., and S. E. Nelson. Judging Mens Rea: The Tension Between Folk Concepts and Legal Concepts of Intentionality, Behavioral Sciences and the Law 21, 2003, pp. 563-80.10.1002/bsl.55414502689Search in Google Scholar

14. Mele, A., and S. Sverdlik. Intention, International Action, and Moral Responsibility, Philosophical Studies 82 (3), 1996, pp. 265-87.10.1007/BF00355310Search in Google Scholar

15. Nadelhoffer, T. Bad Acts, Blameworthy Agents, and Intentional Actions: Some Problems for Juror Impartiality, Philosophical Explorations 9 (2), 2006, pp. 203-19.10.1080/13869790600641905Search in Google Scholar

16. Nadelhoffer, T. Desire, Foresight, Intentions, and Intentional Actions: Probing Folk Intuitions, Journal of Cognition and Culture 6 (1-2), 2006, pp. 133-57.10.1163/156853706776931259Search in Google Scholar

17. Nadelhoffer, T. On Praise, Side Effects, and Folk Ascriptions of Intentionality, Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 24 (2), 2004, pp. 196-213.10.1037/h0091241Search in Google Scholar

18. Nado, J. Effects of Moral Cognition on Judgments of Intentionality, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4), 2008, pp. 709-31.10.1093/bjps/axn035Search in Google Scholar

19. Nichols, S., and J. Ulatowski. Intuitions and Individual Differences: The Knobe Effect Revisited, Mind and Language 22 (4), 2007, pp. 346-65.10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00312.xSearch in Google Scholar

20. Paprzycka, K. Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities. In A. Kuźniar, and J. Odrowąż-Sypniewska (eds.), The Sciences, Leiden, Boston: Brill Rodopi, 2016, pp. 204-33.Search in Google Scholar

21. Paprzycka, K. The Omissions Account of the Knobe Effect and the Asymmetry Challenge, Mind and Language 30 (5), 2015, pp. 550-71.10.1111/mila.12090Search in Google Scholar

22. Piekarski, M. One or Many Normativities? Studia Philosophiae Christianae 54 (1), 2018, pp. 5-24.10.21697/2018.54.1.11Search in Google Scholar

23. Piekarski, M. Two Arguments Supporting the Thesis About the Predictive Nature of Reasons for Action, Studia Philosophiae Christianae 54 (1), 2018, pp. 93-119.10.21697/2018.54.1.14Search in Google Scholar

24. Waleszczyński, A. Dwa porządki normatywne. Komentarz do dyskusji o intencjonalności działania, AVANT. The Journal of the Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard 8 (3), 2017, pp. 119-28.10.26913/80302017.0112.0007Search in Google Scholar