[Badan, Linda & Francesca Del Gobbo. 2010. On the syntax of topic and focus in Chinese. In Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds.), Mapping the left periphery: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 5, 63–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199740376.003.0003]Search in Google Scholar
[Bhatt, Rajesh & Roumyana Pancheva. 2006. Conditionals. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. 1, 638–687. Boston & Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996591.ch16]Search in Google Scholar
[Bianchi, Valentina & Mara Frascarelli. 2010. Is topic a root phenomenon? Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2(1). 43–88.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheenan. 2010. Parametric variation: Null subject in minimalist theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511770784]Search in Google Scholar
[Bonvino, Elisabetta. 2006. Le sujet postverbal en italien parlé: Syntaxe, zones et intonation (Biblioteque des Faits de Langue). Paris: Ophrys.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 25–55. New York: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chafe, Wallace. 1987. Cognitive constraints and information flow. In Russel S. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse: Outcome of a symposium, 21–51. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.11.03cha]Search in Google Scholar
[Chierchia, Gennaro & Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1990. Meaning and grammar. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[D’Alessandro, Roberta. 2015. Null subject. In Antonio Fábregas, Jaume Mateu & Mike Putnam (eds.), Contemporary linguistic parameters, 201–226. London, Oxford, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.]Search in Google Scholar
[Del Gobbo, Francesca. 2003. Appositives at the interface. Irvine, CA: University of California Irvine dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ding, Hongdi. 2009. Hanyu huati jiegou de guangyi zuo xiang hebing moshi yanjiu [A generalized leftward merger interpretation of Chinese topic structures]. Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies 20(2). 58–63.]Search in Google Scholar
[Emonds, Joseph. 2004. Unspecified categories as in the key to root constructions. In David Adger, Cécile de Cat & Georges Tsoulas (eds.), Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects, 75–120. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/1-4020-1910-6_4]Search in Google Scholar
[Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 2006. Bridge Phenomena. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion of syntax, vol. 1, 284–294. Boston & Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996591.ch10]Search in Google Scholar
[Frascarelli, Mara. 2007. Subjects, topics and the interpretation of referential pro: An interface approach to the linking of (null) pronouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25(4). 691–734.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frascarelli, Mara. 2017a. Romance pro-drop languages at the interfaces: A comparative analysis. Paper presented at the 31st Going Romance Symposyum, University of Bucharest, 7–9 December.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frascarelli, Mara. 2017b. Dislocations and Framings. In Elisabeth Stark & Andreas Dufter (eds.), Manual of Romance morphosyntax and syntax, 472–501. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110377088-013]Search in Google Scholar
[Frascarelli, Mara. 2018. The interpretation of pro in consistent and partial NS languages: A comparative interface analysis. In Federica Cognola & Jan Casalicchio (eds.), Null-subjects in generative grammar: A synchronic and diachronic perspective, 211–239. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frascarelli, Mara & Roland Hinterhölzl. 2007. Types of topics in German and Italian. In Susanne Winkler & Kerstin Schwabe (eds.), On information structure, meaning and form, 87–116. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.100.07fra]Search in Google Scholar
[Frascarelli, Mara & Ángel L. Jiménez-Fernández. In press. Understanding partiality in pro-drop languages: An information-structure approach. Syntax [Special issue on information structure].]Search in Google Scholar
[Fu, Yiting. 2011. A syntactic contrast of English and Chinese—Subject-prominent vs. topic-prominent. Overseas English 2. 394–395.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gelderen, Elly van. 2013, Null subjects in old English. Linguistic Inquiry 44. 271–285.10.1162/LING_a_00127]Search in Google Scholar
[Haegeman, Liliane. 2002. Anchoring to speaker, adverbial clauses and the structure of CP. Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 2. 117–180.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haegeman, Liliane. 2010. The internal syntax of adverbial clauses. Lingua 120. 628–648.10.1016/j.lingua.2008.07.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Haegeman, Liliane. 2012. Adverbial clauses, main clause phenomena, and the composition of the left periphery. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199858774.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heim, Irene. 1990. E-type pronouns and donkey anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 13. 137–177.10.1007/BF00630732]Search in Google Scholar
[Heycock, Caroline. 2006. Embedded Root Phenomena. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. 2, 174–209. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996591.ch23]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15. 531–574.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, C. T. James. 1989. Pro-drop in Chinese: A generalized control theory. In Osvaldo Jaeggli & Ken Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol. 15), 185–214. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3_6]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, C. T. James, Y. H. Audrey Li & Yafei Li. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166935]Search in Google Scholar
[Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L. 2016. When discourse met null subjects. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 5(2). 173–189.10.7557/1.5.2.3727]Search in Google Scholar
[Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L. & Shigeru Miyagawa. 2014. A feature-inheritance approach to root phenomena and parametric variation. Lingua 145. 275–302.10.1016/j.lingua.2014.04.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Kibort, Anna & Greville G. Corbett (eds.) 2010. Features: Perspectives on a key notion in linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577743.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Krifka, Manfred. 2001. Quantifying into question acts. Natural Language Semantics 9. 1–40.10.1023/A:1017903702063]Search in Google Scholar
[Krifka, Manfred. 2007. Basic notions of information structure. In Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow & Manfred Krifka (eds.), Interdisciplinary studies on information structure 6. 13–55. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1979 [1965]. Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation. Reprint, New York: Garland Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus and the ental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620607]Search in Google Scholar
[Landau, Idan. 2015. A two-tiered theory of control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262028851.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[LaPolla, Randy John. 2009. Chinese as a topic-comment (Not topic-prominent and not SVO) language. In Janet Xing (ed.), Studies of Chinese linguistics: Functional approaches, 9–22. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lasnik, Howard & Mamoru Saito. 1992. Move α: Conditions on its application and output. Cambridge: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Manzini, Maria Rita. 1992. Locality: A theory and some of its empirical consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Miyagawa, Shigeru & Mamoru Saito. 2008. The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195307344.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Neeleman, Ad & Kriszta Szendrői. 2007. Radical pro-drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 38. 671–714.10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.671]Search in Google Scholar
[Neeleman, Ad, & Kriszta Szendrői. 2008. Case morphology and radical pro-drop. In Biberauer Theresa (ed.), The limits of syntactic variation, 331–348. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.132.14nee]Search in Google Scholar
[Pan, Victor Junnan & Waltraud Paul. 2018. The syntax of complex sentences in Mandarin Chinese: A comprehensive overview and analyses. In Victor Junnan Pan & Waltraud Paul (eds.). The syntax of complex sentences in Chinese [Special issue]. Linguistic Analysis 42. 63–161.]Search in Google Scholar
[Paul, Waltraud. 2015. New perspective on Chinese syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110338775]Search in Google Scholar
[Puglielli, Annarita & Mara Frascarelli. 2005. A comparative analysis of restrictive and appositive relative clauses in Cushitic languages. In Brugè, Laura, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, Walter Schweikert & Giuseppina Turano (eds.), Contribution to the Incontro di Grammatica Generativa XXX, 279–303. Venezia: Cafoscarina.]Search in Google Scholar
[Puglielli, Annarita & Mara Frascarelli. 2009. Position, function and interpretation of topics in Somali. In Lunella Mereu (ed.), Information structure and its interfaces, 325–348. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110213973.4.325]Search in Google Scholar
[Puglielli, Annarita & Mara Frascarelli. 2011. Linguistic analysis: From data to theory. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110222517]Search in Google Scholar
[Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rebuschi, Georges. 2005. Generalizing the antisymmetric analysis of coordination to nominal modification. Lingua 115(4). 445–459.10.1016/j.lingua.2003.09.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Reinhart, Tania. 1982. Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27. 53–94.10.21825/philosophica.82606]Search in Google Scholar
[Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7]Search in Google Scholar
[Rizzi, Luigi. 2006. On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Wh-movement: Moving on, 97–133. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Saito, Mamoru. 2007. Notes on East Asian argument ellipsis. Unpublished manuscript: Nanzan University and University of Connecticut.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shi, Dingxu. 1998. Hanyu zhutiju de texing [The nature of Chinese topics]. Modern Foreign Languages 2. 40–57.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shi, Dingxu. 2000. Topic and topic-comment construction in Mandarin Chinese. Language 76(2). 383–408.10.1353/lan.2000.0070]Search in Google Scholar
[Sigurdsson, Halldor. 2011. Conditions on argument drop. Linguistic Inquiry 42. 267–304.10.1162/LING_a_00042]Search in Google Scholar
[Song, Xiuping. 2009. Kong zhuyu (pro) zai ying han zhong de butong canshu shezhi [The licensing mechanism of English and Chinese pro]. Journal of Shanghai Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 38(3). 128–132.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sun, Kun. 2015. Hanyu huati lian fanchou, jiegou yu pianzhang gongneng [The category, structure and textual function of topic chains in Chinese discourse]. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies 5. 72–82.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tomioka, Satoshi. 2003. The semantics of Japanese null pronouns and its cross linguistic implications. In Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkle (eds.), The interfaces: Deriving and interpreting omitted structures, 321–339. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.61.16tom]Search in Google Scholar
[Villata, Sandra, Luigi Rizzi & Julie Franck. 2016. Intervention effects and relativized minimality: New experimental evidence from graded judgments. Lingua 179. 76–96.10.1016/j.lingua.2016.03.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, Yufang. 1995. A corpus-based study of adverbial clauses in Mandarin Chinese conversations: A preliminary analysis. In Benjamin K. T’sou & Tom B. Y. Lai (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.]Search in Google Scholar
[Xu, Min. 2005. Kong zhuyu canshu he hanyu de wuzhuju [Null subject parameter and null subject in Chinese]. Journal of Southern Yangtze University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition) 3. 92–94.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yuan, Suwen. 2014. Cong kong yulei kan hanyu kongwei zhuyu [The analysis of Chinese null subjects based on empty categories]. Journal of Heilongjiang College of Education 33(7). 122–123.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, Niina Ning. 2016. Identifying Chinese dependent clauses in the forms of subjects. Journal of East Asian Linguist 25(3). 275–311.10.1007/s10831-016-9146-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Zheng, Chao. 2001. Kuochong de toushe yuanze yu Zhongguoren de zhuyu qianyishi [EPP and the sense of covert subject of native Chinese speakers]. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 24(3). 24–26.]Search in Google Scholar
