Open Access

Sensitive Analysis on Selection of Piston Material Using MADM Techniques


Cite

[1] Anup, K. S., Abijeet TK, Machado, J. W., Shrivathsa, TV. “Design and Analysis of Piston using Aluminum Alloys”, International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering 4 (4), pp. 1 – 6, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Owsinski, R., Nieslony, A. “Identification of Fatigue Cracks On The Basis Of Measurable Changes in System Dynamics”, Strojnícky časopis – Journal of Mechanical Engineering 67 (2), pp. 77 – 84, 2017. DOI: 10.1515/scjme-2017-002010.1515/scjme-2017-0020Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[3] Hwang, C. L., Yoon, K. “Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications”, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-910.1007/978-3-642-48318-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[4] Xu, L., Yang, J.-B. “Introduction to Multi-Criteria Decision Making and the Evidential Reasoning Approach”,. Manchester School of Management, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, 2001. ISBN: 1 86115 111 XSearch in Google Scholar

[5] Aarushi, S. “Major MCDM Techniques and their application-A Review”, IOSR Journal of Engineering 4 (5), pp. 15 – 25, 2014. DOI: 10.9790/3021-0452152510.9790/3021-04521525Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[6] Zardari, N.H., Ahmed, K., Shirazi, S.M., Yusop, Z.B. “Weighting Methods and their Effects on Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model Outcomes in Water Resources Management”, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12586-210.1007/978-3-319-12586-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[7] Cavallini, C., Giorgetti, A., Citti, P., Nicolaie, F. “Integral aided method for material selection based on quality function deployment and comprehensive VIKOR algorithm”, Materials & Design 47, pp. 27–34, 2013.10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.009Search in Google Scholar

[8] Chatterjee, P., Chakraborty, S. “Material selection using preferential ranking methods”, Materials & Design 35, pp. 384–393, 2012.10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.027Search in Google Scholar

[9] Chauhan, A., Vaish, R. “Magnetic material selection using multiple attribute decision-making approach”, Materials & Design 36, pp. 1 – 5, 2012.10.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.021Search in Google Scholar

[10] Jahan, A., Edwards, K. “VIKOR method for material selection problems with interval numbers and target-based criteria”, Materials & Design 47, pp. 759 – 765, 2013.10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.072Search in Google Scholar

[11] Jahan, A., Mustapha, F., Ismail, M. Y., Sapuan, S., Bahraminasab, M. “A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection”, Materials & Design 32, pp. 1215 – 1221, 2011.10.1016/j.matdes.2010.10.015Search in Google Scholar

[12] Vanko, B., Stanček, L., Moravčík, R. “En Aw-2024 Wrought Aluminum Alloy Processed By Casting With Crystallization Under Pressure”, Strojnícky časopis – Journal of Mechanical Engineering 67 (2), pp. 109 – 116, 2017. DOI: 10.1515/scjme-2017-002410.1515/scjme-2017-0024Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[13] Dwivedi, D. K., Sharma, A., Rajan, T.V. “Machining of LM13 and LM28 cast aluminium alloys: Part I”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 196, pp. 197 – 204, 2008.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.05.032Search in Google Scholar

[14] “What is the difference among MCDM, MADM, MODM and MAUT?”, https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_the_difference_among_MCDM_MADM_MODM_and_MAUTSearch in Google Scholar

[15] Liu, H.-C., Mao, L.-X., Zhang, Z.-Y., Li, P. “Induced aggregation operators in the VIKOR method and its application in material selection”, Applied Mathematical Modelling 37, pp. 6325 – 6338, 2013.10.1016/j.apm.2013.01.026Search in Google Scholar

[16] Mayyas, A., Shen, Q., Mayyas, A., abdelhamid, M., Shan, D., Qattawi, A., Omar, M. “Using Quality Function Deployment and Analytical Hierarchy Process for material selection of Body-In-White”, Materials & Design 32, pp. 2771 – 2782, 2011.10.1016/j.matdes.2011.01.001Search in Google Scholar

[17] Shanian, A., Milani, A. S., Carson, C., Abeyaratne, R. C. “A new application of ELECTRE III and revised Simos’ procedure for group material selection underweighting uncertainty”, Knowledge-Based Systems 21, pp. 709 – 720, 2008.10.1016/j.knosys.2008.03.028Search in Google Scholar

[18] Helff, F., Gruenwald, L., d’Orazio, L. “Weighted Sum Model for Multi-Objective Query Optimization for Mobile-Cloud Database Environments” Published in EDBT/ICDT Workshops, 2016, online: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1558/paper39.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[19] Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C. “A multi-criteria classification approach based on a pairwise comparison”, European Journal of Operational Research 158, pp. 378 – 389, 2004.10.1016/j.ejor.2003.06.011Search in Google Scholar

[20] Hajkowicz S., Higgins, A. “A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management”, European Journal of Operational Research 184, pp. 255 – 265, 2008.10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.045Search in Google Scholar

[21] Sameer Kumar, D., Suman K. N. S. “Selection of Magnesium Alloy by MADM Methods for Automobile Wheels”, IJEM 4 (2), pp. 31 – 41, 2014. DOI: 10.5815/ijem.2014.02.0310.5815/ijem.2014.02.03Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[22] Parnell, G., Trainor, T. “2.3.1 Using the Swing Weight Matrix to Weight Multiple Objectives”, INCOSE International Symposium 19, pp. 283 – 298, 2009. DOI: 10.1002/j.2334-5837.2009.tb00949.x10.1002/j.2334-5837.2009.tb00949.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[23] Li, X., Wang, K., Liu, L., Xin, J., Yang, H., Gao, Ch., “Application of the Entropy Weight and TOPSIS Method in Safety Evaluation of Coal Mines”, Procedia Engineering 26, pp. 2085 – 2091, 2011. DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.241010.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2410Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[24] Lotfi, F. H., Fallahnejad, R. “Imprecise Shannon’s Entropy and Multi Attribute Decision Making”, Entropy 12, pp. 53 – 62, 2010. DOI: 10.3390/e1201005310.3390/e12010053Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[25] Rao, R. V., Davim, J. P. “A decision-making framework model for material selection using a combined multiple attribute decision-making method”, Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35, pp. 751 – 760, 2008. DOI 10.1007/s00170-006-0752-710.1007/s00170-006-0752-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[26] Swapna, D., Srinivasa Rao, Ch., Kumar, S., Radhika, S. “AHP and TOPSIS based selection of aluminium alloy for automobile panels”, Journal of Mechanical and Energy Engineering 3 (1), pp. 43 – 50, 2019. DOI: 10.30464/jmee.2019.3.1.4310.30464/jmee.2019.3.1.43Search in Google Scholar

[27] Gomes, L. F. A. M., Rangel A. D., Leal, M. da R. Jr.. “Treatment of uncertainty through the interval smart/swing weighting method: a case study”, Pesquisa Operational, 31 (3), pp. 467 – 485, 2011. DOI: 10.1590/S0101-7438201100030000410.1590/S0101-74382011000300004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[28] Kumar D. S., Radhika, S., Suman, K. N. S. “MADM methods for finding the right personnel in academic institutions”, International Journal of u-and e-Service, Science and Technology 6 (5), pp. 133 – 144, 2013.10.14257/ijunesst.2013.6.5.12Search in Google Scholar

[29] Baragetti, S. “Analytic Hierarchy Process Application for the Selection of a Metal Matrix Composite”, The Open Materials Science Journal 8 (1), pp. 63 – 70, 2014. DOI: 10.2174/1874088X0140801006310.2174/1874088X01408010063Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[30] Žmindák, M. “Dynamic and Sensitivity Analysis General Non-Conservative Asymmetric Mechanical Systems”, Strojnícky časopis – Journal of Mechanical Engineering 68 (2), pp. 105 – 124, 2018. DOI: 10.2478/scjme-2018-002110.2478/scjme-2018-0021Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[31] Memariania, A., Aminib, A., Alinezhadc, A. “Sensitivity Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting Method (SAW): The Results of Change in the Weight of One Attribute on the Final Ranking of Alternatives”, Journal of Industrial Engineering 4, pp. 13 – 18, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Alinezhada, A., Esfandiari, N. “Sensitivity Analysis in the QUALIFLEX and VIKOR Methods”, Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering 10, pp. 29 – 34, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Yazdani, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Ignatius, J., Abad, M. D. “Sensitivity Analysis in MADM Methods: Application of Material Selection”, Engineering Economics Decisions 27 (4), 2016. DOI: 10.5755/j01.ee.27.4.1400510.5755/j01.ee.27.4.14005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2450-5471
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Fundamentals of Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics