Open Access

Radiocarbon pottery dating: the chemical compounds of organic fractions, the reliability of 14C dates (preliminary results)


Cite

[1] Bobrinsky AA, 1999. Actual problems of the study of the ancient figulines. Samara. The state Samara pedagogical University press: 106pp (in Russian) Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bardet M, Foray MF and Trân QK, 2002. High-Resolution Solid-State CPMAS NMR Study of Archaeological Woods. Analytical Chemistry. 74(17): 4386–4390, DOI 10.1021/ac020145j. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac020145j10.1021/ac020145j12236346Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bonsail C, Cook G, Manson JL and Saderson D, 2002. Direct dating of Neolithic pottery: progress and prospects. Documenta Praehistorica XXIX: 47–59. 10.4312/dp.29.5Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bronk Ramsey C, 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1): 337–360. 10.1017/S0033822200033865Search in Google Scholar

[5] Dmitruk SE, Yusubov MS, Belousov MV, Gostischeva MV and Ismatova ZZ, 2009. The comparative IR spectra of the humic asides of different origin from of the peat bogs of the Tomsk regions. Chemical-pharmaceutical Journal 7: 44–47 (in Russian). Search in Google Scholar

[6] Dolukhanov PM, Shukurov A, Davison K, Sarson G, Gerasimenko NP, Pashkevich GA, Vybornov A, Kovaliukh NN, Skripkin VV, Zaitseva GI and Sapelko TV, 2009. The spread of the Neolithic in the South East European Plain: radiocarbon chronology, subsistence and environment. Radiocarbon 51: 783–795. 10.1017/S0033822200056095Search in Google Scholar

[7] Gostischeva MV, 2006. Chemical and biological characteristics of different fractions of the humic asides and sapropels. Proceeding of the 5 thscientific cschool “ Peats”. Tomsk: 168-175pp (in Russian). Search in Google Scholar

[8] Harris RK and Wasylishen R, eds., 2010. Encyclopedia of Magnetic Resonance. John Wiley: Chichester. DOI 10.1002/9780470034590.emrstm0211. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Ionin BI and Ershov BA, 1970. NMR spectroscopy in organic Chemistry. New York: Plenum Publising Corporation: 195pp. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Ionin BI, Ershov BA and Kol’tsov AI, 1983. NMR-spectroscopy in the organic chemistry. Leningrad. Chimiya press: 272pp. (in Russian) Search in Google Scholar

[11] Lambert JB, Shawl CE and Stearns JA, 2000. Nuclear magnetic resonance in archaeology. Chemical Society Reviews 29: 175–182, DOI 10.1039/A908378B. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/a908378b10.1039/a908378bSearch in Google Scholar

[12] Popov AI, 2004. Humic substances: properties, composition, formation. Saint-Petersburg: 248pp. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Orlov DS, 1990. Humus acids of soil and general theory of humification. M.: MGU: 325pp. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Reimer PJ, Baillie MGL, Bard E, Bayliss A, Beck JW, Blackwell PG, Bronk Ramsey C, Buck CE, Burr GS, Edwards RL, Friedrich M, Grootes PM, Guilderson TP, Hajdas I, Heaton TJ, Hogg AG, Hughen KA, Kaiser KF, Kromer B, McCormac FG, Manning SW, Reimer RW, Richards DA, Southon JR, Talamo S, Turney CSM, van der Plicht J, 2009. IntCal09 and Marine09 Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curves, 0–50,000 Years cal BP. Radiocarbon 51(4): 1111–1150. 10.1017/S0033822200034202Search in Google Scholar

[15] Shersheva NG, Rakitina TA, Povetkina LP, 2009. Conditions of formation of the granulometric compositions of the silt sediments on the territory of the National Park “Samarskaya Luka”. Problems of the regional and global ecology of the Samarskaya Luka 18(3): 104–113 (in Russian). Search in Google Scholar

[16] Skripkin VV and Kovalyukh NN, 1998. Recent developments in the procedures used at the SSCER Laboratory for the routine preparation of Lithium Carbide. Radiocarbon 40: 211–214. 10.1017/S0033822200018063Search in Google Scholar

[17] Timofeev VI, Zaytseva GI, Dolukhanov PM and Shukurov AM, 2004. Radiocarbon chronology of the Neolithic of Eurasia Teza. St.-Petersburg: 419 pp (in Russian). Search in Google Scholar

[18] Tokarenko SF, 2005. The technology of the manufacturing of the Rakuschecny Yar pottery: the experience of the reconstruction. Archaeological proceedings. Issue 4. Rostov-on-Don: 318–321 (in Russian). Search in Google Scholar

[19] Vasilieva IN, 1999. Fictility of the population of the Northern Caspian Sea region in the Neolithic. The Questions of Archaeology of the Volga river regions. Samara. Issue 1: 77–89 (in Russian). Search in Google Scholar

[20] Vasilieva IN, 2009. About the evolution of the ideas of the plastic row materials of the Neolithic population of the steppe Volga area (based on the materials of the Varfolomeevskaya site). Problems of the study of the Bronze Age cultures of the steppe zone of the Eastern Europe. Orenburg. Orenburg State Pedagogical University press: 65–88 (in Russian). Search in Google Scholar

[21] Vybornov AA, 2008. The Neolithic of the Volga-Kama region. Samara. University Press: 488pp (in Russian). Search in Google Scholar

[22] Zaytseva G, Skripkin V, Kovaliukh N, Possnert G, Dolukhanov P and Vybornov A, 2009. Radiocarbon dating of Neolithic pottery. Radiocarbon 51: 795–803. 10.1017/S0033822200056101Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1897-1695
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
Volume Open
Journal Subjects:
Geosciences, other