Open Access

Treatment of Particulate Matter Pollution: People’s Attitude and Readiness to Act

Environmental and Climate Technologies's Cover Image
Environmental and Climate Technologies
SPECIAL ISSUE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES PART I: The Green Deal Umbrella for Environmental and Climate Technologies

Cite

[1] Chen J., et al., 2017. A review of biomass burning: Emissions and impacts on air quality, health and climate in China. Science of Total Environment 2016:579:1000–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.02510.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.02527908624Search in Google Scholar

[2] Clean Heat. Residential wood burning. Environmental impact and sustainable solutions. Berlin: Deutdche Umwelthilfe, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Pereira G., et al. Development of a model for particulate matter pollution in Australia with implications for other satellite-based models. Environmental Research 2017:159:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.07.04410.1016/j.envres.2017.07.04428759784Search in Google Scholar

[4] Oh I., et al. Association between particulate matter concentration and symptoms of atopic dermatitis in children living in an industrial urban area of South Korea. Environmental Research 2018:160:462–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.03010.1016/j.envres.2017.10.03029078139Search in Google Scholar

[5] Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements. Official Journal of the Europeam Union 2009:L 285/10.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Priedniece V., et al. Laboratory research of the flue gas condenser – fog unit. Energy Procedia 2018:147:482–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.05610.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.056Search in Google Scholar

[7] Priedniece V., et al. Particulate Matter Emission Decrease Possibility from Household Sector using Flue Gas Condenser – Fog Unit. Analysis and Interpretation of Results. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(1):135–151. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-001010.2478/rtuect-2019-0010Search in Google Scholar

[8] Fog unit (IFUS) | ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE [Online]. [Accessed: 17.10.2019]. Available: https://videszinatne.rtu.lv/en/science/project-and-research/fog-unit-ifusSearch in Google Scholar

[9] Bhutto A.W., et al. Promoting sustainability of use of biomass as energy resource: Pakistan’s perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2019:26:29606–29619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06179-710.1007/s11356-019-06179-731452125Search in Google Scholar

[10] Decker T., Menrad K. House owners’ perceptions and factors influencing their choice of specific heating systems in Germany. Energy Policy 2015:85:150–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.06.00410.1016/j.enpol.2015.06.004Search in Google Scholar

[11] Linares C., et al. Influence of advections of particulate matter from biomass combustion on specific-cause mortality in Madrid in the period 2004–2009. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2015:22:7012–7019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3916-210.1007/s11356-014-3916-225483974Search in Google Scholar

[12] Rouvinen S., Matero J. Stated preferences of Finnish private homeowners for residential heating systems: A discrete choice experiment. Biomass and Bioenergy 2013:57:22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.10.01010.1016/j.biombioe.2012.10.010Search in Google Scholar

[13] Bjørnstad E. Diffusion of renewable heating technologies in households. Experiences from the Norwegian Household Subsidy Programme. Energy Policy 2012:48(0301):148–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.07810.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.078Search in Google Scholar

[14] Wang Z., et al. Cleaner heating choices in northern rural China: Household factors and the dual substitution policy. Journal of Environment Management 2019:249:109433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.10943310.1016/j.jenvman.2019.10943331450194Search in Google Scholar

[15] Woodward A., et al. Population health impacts of China’s climate change policies. Environmental Research 2019:175:178–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.05.02010.1016/j.envres.2019.05.02031129527Search in Google Scholar

[16] Lillemo S.C., et al. Households’ heating investments: The effect of motives andattitudes on choice of equipment. Biomass and Bioenergy 2013:57:4–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.01.02710.1016/j.biombioe.2013.01.027Search in Google Scholar

[17] Sopha B. M., et al. Norwegian households’ perception of wood pellet stove compared to air-to-air heat pump and electric heating. Energy Policy 2010:38(7):3744–3754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.05210.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.052Search in Google Scholar

[18] Esterkin P. I. Thermotechnical measurements in the combustion of gas and liquid fuels. Leningrad: Nedra, 1981. (in Russian)Search in Google Scholar

[19] Ozaki R. Adopting sustainable innovation: What makes consumers sign up to green electricity? Business Strategy and the Envronment 2011:20(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.65010.1002/bse.650Search in Google Scholar

[20] Priedniece V., et al. Sprayed Water Flowrate, Temperature and Drop Size Effects on Small Capacity Flue Gas Condenser’s Performance. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(3):333-346. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-009910.2478/rtuect-2019-0099Search in Google Scholar

[21] Jimenez-Bescos C., Oregi X. Implementing User Behaviour on Dynamic Building Silmulations for Energy Consumptions. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(3):308-318. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-009710.2478/rtuect-2019-0097Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2255-8837
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, other