Postoperative TKA alignment in sagittal and axial plane, a systematic review

1. Pavlov H. Lower Extremity, Knee. Lateral view. In: Pavlov H, Burke M, Giesa M et al. Orthopaedist's guide to plain film imaging. 1999, New York, Thieme.Search in Google Scholar

2. Berquist TH. The Knee. In: Berquist TH. Imaging of Orthopaedic Fixation Devices and Prostheses. 2009, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 251-332.Search in Google Scholar

3. Paley D. Radiographic Assessment of Lower Limb Deformities. In: Paley D. Principles of Deformity Correction. 2002, New York, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-59373-4Search in Google Scholar

4. Minoda Y, Kobayashi A, Iwaki H et al. TKA sagittal alignment with navigation system and conventional technique vary only few degrees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467:1000-1006.10.1007/s11999-008-0449-3265005918712579Search in Google Scholar

5. Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE et al. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: Just how important is it?. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(6, suppl):39-43.10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.03419553073Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Yehyawi TM, Callaghan JJ, Pedersen DR et al. Variances in Sagittal Femoral Shaft Bowing in Patients Undergoing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 464:99-104.10.1097/BLO.0b013e318157e4a217767082Search in Google Scholar

7. Chung BJ, Kang YG, Chang CB et al. Differences between sagittal femoral mechanical and distal reference axes should be considered in navigated Res. 2009; 467:240 3-13.10.1007/s11999-009-0762-5286692319242764Search in Google Scholar

8. Seo JG, Kim BK, Moon YW et al. Bony landmarks for determining the mechanical axis of the femur in the sagittal plane during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2009; 1:128-31.10.4055/cios.2009.1.3.128276674719885047Search in Google Scholar

9. Balakrishnan V, De Steigert R, Lowe A. Radiographic assessment of alignment following TKA: outline of standardized protocol and assessment of a newly devise trigonometric method of analysis. ANZ J Surg. 2010; 80: 344-9.10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.05198.x20557509Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Hankemeier S, Gosling T, Richter M et al. Computer assisted analysis of lower limb geometry: higher intra observer reliability compared to conventional method. Comput Aided Surg. 2006; 11:81-6.10.3109/1092908060062898516782643Search in Google Scholar

11. Hinman RS, May RL, Crossley KM. Is there an alternative to the full leg radiograph for determining knee joint alignment in osteoarthritis?. Arthritis Rheum. 2006; 55:306-13.10.1002/art.2183616583430Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Yin L, Chen K, Guo L et al. Knee alignment in the trans-verse plane during weight-bearing activity and its implication for the tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2015; 30(6):565-71.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.04.00325936578Search in Google Scholar

13. Maderbacher G, Baier C, Benditz A et al. Presence of rotational errors in long leg radiographs after total knee arthroplasty and impact on measured lower limb and component alignment. Int Orthop. 2017 Jan 31.10.1007/s00264-017-3408-328144722Search in Google Scholar

14. Yoo JH, Chang CB, Shin KS et al. Anatomical references to assess the posterior tibial slope in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of 5 anatomical axes. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 23:586-92.10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.00618514879Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Denis K, Van Ham G, Bellemans J et al. How correctly does an intramedullary rod represent the longitudinal tibial axes?. Clin Orthop Related Res. 2002; 397:424-33.10.1097/00003086-200204000-0005011953637Search in Google Scholar

16. Singh G, Tan JH, Sng BY et al. Restoring the anatomical tibial slope and limb axis may maximize post-operative flexion in posterior-stabilized total knee replacements. Bone Joint J. 2013; 95-B(10): 1354-1358.10.1302/0301-620X.95B10.3147724078531Search in Google Scholar

17. Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, et al. Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deepflexion in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84: 50-3.10.1302/0301-620X.84B1.0840050Search in Google Scholar

18. Soda Y, Oishi J, Nakasa T et al. New parameter of flexion after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: posterior condylar offset ratio on X-ray photographs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007; 127:167-70.10.1007/s00402-007-0295-x17372749Search in Google Scholar

19. Arabori M, Matsui N, Kuroda R et al. Posterior condylar offset and flexion in posterior cruciate-retaining an posterior stabilized TKA. J Orthop Sci. 2008; 13:46-50.10.1007/s00776-007-1191-518274855Search in Google Scholar

20. Clarke HD, Hentz JG. Restoration of femoral anatomy in TKA with unisex and gender-specific components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466:2711-6.10.1007/s11999-008-0454-6256502218719972Search in Google Scholar

21. Fehring TK, Odum SM, Hughes J et al. Differences between the sexes in the anatomy of the anterior condyle of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91:2335-41.10.2106/JBJS.H.0083419797567Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22. Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR et al. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; (331):35-46.10.1097/00003086-199610000-000068895617Search in Google Scholar

23. WeissmanBN. Radiographic evaluation of total joint replacement. In: Sledge CB, Ruddy S, Harris ED Jr. et al. Arthritis Surgery. 1994, Philadelphia, PA, WB Saunders, 846–907.Search in Google Scholar

24. Miller RK, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW et al. In vitro measurement of patellofemoral force after three types of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80:900.10.1302/0301-620X.80B5.0800900Search in Google Scholar

25. Caton JH, Prudhon JL, Aslanian T et al. Patellar height assessment in total knee arthroplasty: a new method. Int Orthop. 2016; 40(12):2527-2531.10.1007/s00264-016-3256-627503481Search in Google Scholar

26. Lin CF, Wu JJ, Chen TS et al. Comparison of the Insall-Salvati ratio of the patella in patients with and without an ACL tear. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005; 13(1):8-11.10.1007/s00167-004-0515-715654645Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

27. Allen AM, Ward WG, Pope TL et al. Imaging of the total knee arthroplasty. Radiol Clin North Am. 1995; 33:289–303.10.1016/S0033-8389(22)00420-1Search in Google Scholar

28. Eshnazarov KE, Seon JK, Song EK. Comparison of Radiological Assessments Patellar Resurfacing with Retention for Grade IV Osteoarthritis in Patellofemoral Joint accomplished Total Knee Arthroplasty. Vestn Rentgenol Radiol. 2016; 97(1):28-32.10.20862/0042-4676-2016-97-1-28-3227192770Search in Google Scholar

29. Malo M, Vince KG. The unstable patella after total knee arthroplasty: Etiology, prevention, and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003; 11(5):364-371.10.5435/00124635-200309000-0000914565758Search in Google Scholar

30. Aglietti P, Baldini A, Buzzi R et al. Patella resurfacing in total knee replacement: functional evaluation and complications. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001; 9:S27-33.10.1007/s00167000016011354865Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

31. Figgie H, Goldberg V, Heiple K et al. The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with posterior stabilized condylar knee pros-thesis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1986; 68:1035.10.2106/00004623-198668070-00009Search in Google Scholar

32. Kawamura H, Bourne RB. Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 2001; 6:248-52.10.1007/s00776010004311484119Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

33. Selvarajah E, Hooper G. Restoration of the joint line in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:1099-1102.10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.03018757171Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

34. Mihalko WM, Boyle J, Clark LD et al. The variability of intramedullary alignment of the femoral component during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20:25-8.10.1016/j.arth.2004.10.01115660056Search in Google Scholar

35. Price AJ, Rees JL, Beard DJ et al. Sagittal plane kinematics of a mobile-bearing unicompartimental knee arthroplasty at 10 years: a comparative in vivo fluoroscopic analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19: 0-7.10.1016/j.arth.2003.12.082Search in Google Scholar

36. Chia SL, Merican AM, Devadasan B et al. Radiographic features predictive of patellar maltracking during total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009; 17(10):1217-1224.10.1007/s00167-009-0832-ySearch in Google Scholar

37. Classen T, Wegner A, Muller RD et al. Femoral component rotation and Laurin angle after total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010; 76(1):69-73.Search in Google Scholar

38. Huang TW, Hsu WH, Peng KT et al. Total knee replacement in patients with significant femoral bowing in the coronal plane: a comparison of conventional and computer-assisted surgery in an Asian population. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93:345-50.10.1302/0301-620X.93B3.25990Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

39. Baldini A, Anderson JA, Cerulli-Mariani P et al. Patellofemoral evaluation after total knee arthroplasty. Validation of a new weight-bearing axial radiographic view. J Bon Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89 1810-7.10.2106/JBJS.E.00432Search in Google Scholar

40. Merican AM, Ghosh KM, Baena FR et al. Patellar thickness and lateral retinacular release affects patellofem-oral kinematics in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 22(3):526-533.10.1007/s00167-012-2312-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

41. Bengs BC, Scott RD. The effect of patellar thickness on intraoperative knee flexion and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21:650-5.10.1016/j.arth.2005.07.020Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

42. Kaneka su K, Kondo M, Kadoya Y. Axial radiography of the distal femur to assess rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; (434):193-7.10.1097/01.blo.0000156819.24866.8bSearch in Google Scholar

43. Takai S, Yoshino N, Isshiki T et al. Kneeling view: a new roentgenographic technique to assess rotational deformity and alignment of the distal femur. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18:478-83.10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00065-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

44. Tokuhara Y, Kadoya Y, Kanekasu K et al. Evaluation of the flexion gap by axial radiography of the distal femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88:1327-30.10.1302/0301-620X.88B10.17793Search in Google Scholar

45. Crossett LS, Rubash HE, Berger R. Computerized tomography in total knee arthroplasty. In: Insall JN, Scott WN, Scuderi GR. Current Concepts in Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. 1996, Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott-Raven, 235–248.Search in Google Scholar

46. Berger RA, Seel MJ, Schleiden M et al Determination of femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty using computer tomography. Orthop Trans. 1993; 17:427.Search in Google Scholar

47. Suter T, Zanetti M, Schmid M et al. Reproducibility of measurement of femoral component rotation after total knee arthroplasty using computer tomography. J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21:744-8.10.1016/j.arth.2005.09.01216877163Search in Google Scholar

48. De Valk EJ, Noorduyn JC, Mutsaerts EL. How to assess femoral and tibial component rotation after total knee arthroplasty with computed tomography: a systematic review. Review article. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 24(11):3517-3528.10.1007/s00167-016-4325-527655141Search in Google Scholar

49. Yu HC, Wen H, Zhang Y et al. Research on the reliability of the Akagi line as a reference axis to guide for rotational alignment of the proximal tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2015; 28(10):884-7.Search in Google Scholar