The impact of extreme genu varum and genu valgum on postoperative outcomes using mini-subvastus approach in TKA

1. Tria Jr AJ. Advancements in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Orthopaedics. 2003; 26(Suppl):859.10.3928/0147-7447-20030802-07Search in Google Scholar

2. Bounutti PM, Mont MA, McMahon M et al. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004; 86-A:26.10.2106/00004623-200412002-00005Search in Google Scholar

3. Laskin RS, Beksac B, Phongjunakorn A et al. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini-midvastus incision: an outcome study. Clin Orthop. 2004; 428:74.10.1097/01.blo.0000148582.86102.47Search in Google Scholar

4. Aglietti P, Baldini A, Giron F et al. Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty: Is it for Everybody?. HSSJ. 2006; 2:22–26.10.1007/s11420-005-0127-xSearch in Google Scholar

5. Scuderi GR, Tenholder M, Capeci C et al. Surgical approaches in mini-incision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2004; 428:61.10.1097/01.blo.0000148574.79874.d0Search in Google Scholar

6. Scuderi GR, Tria Jr AJ. Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty. In: Scuderi GR, Tria AJ. MIS of the Hip and the Knee: a Clinical Perspective, 2004, New York, Springer Verlag, 175.10.1007/0-387-21715-0_10Search in Google Scholar

7. Schroer WC, Diesfeld PJ, Reedy ME et al. Mini-Subvastus Approach for Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2008; 23:1.10.1016/j.arth.2006.12.100Search in Google Scholar

8. Goble EM, Justin DF. Minimally invasive total knee replacement: principles and technique. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004; 35:235.10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00113-5Search in Google Scholar

9. Tria Jr A. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the importance of instrumentation. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004; 35:227.10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00118-4Search in Google Scholar

10. Choi YJ, Tanavalee A, Chan APH et al. Minimally invasive surgery for total knee arthroplasty. In: Scuderi GR, Tria AJ. MIS of the Hip and the Knee: a Clinical Perspective, 2004, New York, Springer–Verlag, 160.10.1007/0-387-21715-0_11Search in Google Scholar

11. Hoffmann AA, Plaster RL, Murdock LE et al. Subvastus (southern) approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1991; 269:70.10.1097/00003086-199108000-00012Search in Google Scholar

12. Wegrzyn J, Parratte S, Coleman-Wood K et al. The John Insall Award No Benefit of Minimally Invasive TKA on Gait and Strength Outcomes A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471:46–55.10.1007/s11999-012-2486-1352891322806264Search in Google Scholar

13. Haas SB, Cook S, Beksac B et al. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini midvastus approach. Clin Orthop. 2004; 428:68.10.1097/01.blo.0000147649.82883.ca15534521Search in Google Scholar

14. Scuderi GR, Tria AJ Minimally Invasive Total Knee Artroplasty. In: Scott WN, Clarke HD. Insall & Scott Surgery of the Knee. 2006, Philadelphia, Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier, 1631.Search in Google Scholar

15. Khanna A, Gougoulias N, Longo UG et al. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009; 40:479–489.10.1016/j.ocl.2009.05.00319773053Search in Google Scholar

16. Moreland JR. Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988; 226:49–64.10.1097/00003086-198801000-00010Search in Google Scholar

17. Matsumoto T, Muramatsu H, Kawakami Y et al. Soft tissue balance measurement in minimal incision surgery compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19:880–886.10.1007/s00167-010-1224-z20680244Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Ewald FC. The knee society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; 248:9-12.10.1097/00003086-198911000-00003Search in Google Scholar

19. Gomes LSM, Bechtold JE, Gustilo RB et al. Patellar pros-thesis positioning in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1988; 236:72.10.1097/00003086-198811000-00009Search in Google Scholar

20. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM et al. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop. 1994; 299:153.10.1097/00003086-199402000-00021Search in Google Scholar

21. Rand JA, Coventry MB. Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1988; 232:168-73.10.1097/00003086-198807000-00022Search in Google Scholar