ERCP practice beyond the training period – bridging the gap between guidelines and real-life practice: a single operator experience of 679 procedures

1. SHAHIDI N, OU G, TELFORD J, ENNS R. When trainees reach competency in performing ERCP: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(6):1337-42. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.054. Epub 2015 Apr 1.10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.054.Epub2015Apr1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. COTTON PB. Are low-volume ERCPists a problem in the United States? A plea to examine and improve ERCP practice-NOW.Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(1):161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1233.10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.123321704815Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. SIIKI A, TAMMINEN A, TOMMINEN T, KUUSANMÄKI P. ERCP procedures in a Finnish community hospital: a retrospective analysis of 1207 cases. Scand J Surg. 2012;101(1):45-50.10.1177/14574969121010010922414468Search in Google Scholar

4. KAPRAL C, DULLER C,WEWALKA F et al. Case volume and outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: results of a nationwide Austrian benchmarking project. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 625–63010.1055/s-2008-107746118680074Search in Google Scholar

5. ASGE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE COMMITTEE, FAULX AL, LIGHTDALE JR, ACOSTA RD et al. Guidelines for privileging, credentialing, and proctoring to perform GI endoscopy.Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85(2):273-281. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.036.10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.03628089029Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. WILLIAMS EJ, TAYLOR S, FAIRCLOUGH P et al. Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice. Gut. 2007;56(6):821-9. Epub 2006 Dec 4.10.1136/gut.2006.097543195488317145737Search in Google Scholar

7. COTE GA, KESWANI RN, JACKSON T et al. Individual and practice differences among physicians who perform ERCP at varying frequency: a national survey. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74:65-73.10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.07221492851Search in Google Scholar

8. TALUKDAR R, NAGESHWAR REDDY D. ERCP in developing countries: the way forward. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84(4):667-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.04.037.10.1016/j.gie.2016.04.03727633360Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

9. HU LH, XIN L, LIAO Z, et al. ERCP development in the largest developing country: a national survey from China in 2013. Gastrointest Endosc 2016;84:659-66.10.1016/j.gie.2016.03.132826996289Search in Google Scholar

10. TUMI A, MAGADMI M, ELFAGEIH S et al. ERCP in a cohort of 759 cases: A 6-year experience of a single tertiary centre in Libya. J Gastroenterol. 2015;16(1):25-8.10.1016/j.ajg.2015.02.00425778414Search in Google Scholar

11. EKKELENKAMP VE, KOCH AD, RAUWS EA, BORSBOOM GJ, DE MAN RA, KUIPERS EJ. Competence development in ERCP: the learning curve of novice trainees. Endoscopy. 2014;46(11):949-55.10.1055/s-0034-1377930Search in Google Scholar

12. SHAHIDI N, OU G, TELFORD J, ENNS R. When trainees reach competency in performing ERCP: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(6):1337-42.10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.054Search in Google Scholar

13. SCHUTZ SM, ABBOTT RM. Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: A new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 535–539.10.1016/S0016-5107(00)70285-9Search in Google Scholar

14. VOIOSU T, BENGUS A, VOIOSU A et al. Trainee caseload correlates with ERCP success rates but not with procedure-related complications: results from a prospective study (the QUASIE cohort). Endosc Int Open. 2016;4(4):E409-14.10.1055/s-0042-102248Search in Google Scholar

15. https://rezidentiat.ms.ro/curricule/2017/gastroenterologie_2017.pdf, accessed on 13.02.2018.Search in Google Scholar

16. http://www.emedic.ro/Examene/Publicatie-de-examen-pentru-obtinerea-atestatelor-de-studii-complementare-pentru-medici-medicidentisti-si-farmacisti.htm, accessed on 12.02.2018.Search in Google Scholar

17. COTTON PB, LEHMAN G, VENNES J et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 37: 383–39310.1016/S0016-5107(91)70740-2Search in Google Scholar

18. HAREWOOD GC, BARON TH. An assessment of the learning curve for precut biliary sphincterotomy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1708–1712.10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05829.x12135022Search in Google Scholar

19. TESTONI PA, MARIANI A, AABAKKEN L et al. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline.Endoscopy. 2016;48(7):657-83.10.1055/s-0042-10864127299638Search in Google Scholar

20. LOPES L, DINIS-RIBEIRO M, ROLANDA C. Early precut fistulotomy for biliary access: time to change the paradigm of "the later, the better"?. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80(4):634-41.10.1016/j.gie.2014.03.01424814775Search in Google Scholar

21. NAVANEETHAN U, KONJETI R, VENKATESH PG, et al. Early precut sphincterotomy and the risk of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography related complications: An updated meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6: 200–208.10.4253/wjge.v6.i5.200402449324891933Search in Google Scholar

22. VERMA D, GOSTOUT CJ, PETERSEN BT et al. Establishing a true assessment of endoscopic competence in ERCP during training and beyond: a single-operator learning curve for deep biliary cannulation in patients with native papillary anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65(3):394-400.10.1016/j.gie.2006.03.93317321237Search in Google Scholar

23. VITALE GC, ZAVALETA CM, VITALE DS, et al. Training surgeons in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Surg Endosc 2006;20: 149-52.10.1007/s00464-005-0308-116333544Search in Google Scholar

24. MOON HS, CHOI EK, SEO JH et al. Education and Training Guidelines for the Board of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Clin Endosc. 2017;50(4):345-356.10.5946/ce.2017.106556504828783925Search in Google Scholar

25. BATAGA S, TANTAU M, CRISTIAN G et al. ERCP in Romania in 2006; a National Programme seems mandatory. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2007; 16(4):431-5.Search in Google Scholar

26. VOIOSU T, VOIOSU A, BENGUS A et al. Trainee involvement increases precut rates and delays access to the common bile duct without an increase in procedure-related adverse events: a brave new world of ERCP training? Rom J Intern Med.2018;56:55-61.10.1515/rjim-2017-0041Search in Google Scholar

27. FROST JW, KURUP A, SHETTY S, FISHER N. Does the presence of a trainee compromise success of biliary cannulation at ERCP? Endosc Int Open 2017; 5(7):E559-E562.10.1055/s-0043-105579548274128670611Search in Google Scholar

28. RIESCO-LÓPEZ JM, VÁZQUEZ-ROMERO M, RIZO-PASCUAL JM et al. Efficacy and safety of ERCP in a low-volume hospital.Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2013;105(2):68-73.10.4321/S1130-0108201300020000223659504Search in Google Scholar

29. NALANKILLI K, KANNUTHURAI S, MOSS A. A modern approach to ERCP: maintaining efficacy while optimising safety. Dig Endosc. 2016;28 Suppl 1:70-6.10.1111/den.1259226684277Search in Google Scholar

30. COTTON PB. It’s not the precut; it's the why done and who by. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72(5):1114; author reply 1114. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.02.028.10.1016/j.gie.2010.02.02821034915Open DOISearch in Google Scholar