Is continuous proximal adductor canal analgesia with a periarticular injection comparable to continuous epidural analgesia for postoperative pain after Total Knee Arthroplasty? A retrospective study

1. Jaeger P, Grevstad U, Henningsen MH, Gottschau B, Mathiesen O, Dahl JB. Effect of adductor-canal-blockade on established, severe post-operative pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomised study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012. 56:1013-1019. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02737.x10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02737.x22834681Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Mariano ER, Kim TE, Wagner MJ, Funck N, Harrison TK, Walters T, et al. A randomized comparison of proximal and distal ultrasound-guided adductor canal catheter insertion sites for knee arthroplasty. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33: 1653-1662. doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.9.165310.7863/ultra.33.9.165325154949Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Ishiguro S, Yokochi A, Yoshioka K, Asano N, Deguchi A, Iwasaki Y, et al. Technical communication: anatomy and clinical implications of ultrasound-guided selective femoral nerve block. Anesth Analg 2012; 115: 1467-1470. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31826af95610.1213/ANE.0b013e31826af95622886842Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. Charous MT, Madison SJ, Suresh PJ, Sandhu NS, Loland VJ, Mariano ER, et al. Continuous femoral nerve blocks: varying local anesthetic delivery method (bolus versus basal) to minimize quadriceps motor block while maintaining sensory block. Anesthesiology 2011; 115: 774-781. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182124dc610.1097/ALN.0b013e3182124dc6311699521394001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Ackerman DB, Trousdale RT, Bieber P, Henely J, Pagnano MW, Berry DJ. Postoperative patient falls on an orthopedic inpatient unit. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25: 10-14. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.09.02510.1016/j.arth.2008.09.0251906224919062249Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Hitcho EB, Krauss MJ, Birge S, Claiborne Dunagan W, Fischer I, Johnson S, et al. Characteristics and circumstances of falls in a hospital setting: a prospective analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2004; 19: 732-739. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30387.x10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30387.x149248515209586Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Krombach J, Gray AT. Sonography for saphenous nerve block near the adductor canal. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2007; 32: 369-370. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.04.00610.1016/j.rapm.2007.04.00617720129Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Tsui BC, Ozelsel T. Ultrasound-guided transsartorial perifemoral artery approach for saphenous nerve block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009; 34: 177-178; author reply 178. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31819a273e10.1097/AAP.0b013e31819a273e19282716Search in Google Scholar

9. Horn JL, Pitsch T, Salinas F, Benninger B. Anatomic basis to the ultrasound-guided approach for saphenous nerve blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009; 34: 486-489. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181ae11af10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181ae11af19920424Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Lund J, Jenstrup MT, Jaeger P, Sørensen AM, Dahl JB. Continuous adductor-canal-blockade for adjuvant post-operative analgesia after major knee surgery: preliminary results. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2011; 55: 14-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02333.x10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02333.x21039357Search in Google Scholar

11. Kirkpatrick JD, Sites BD, Antonakakis JG. Preliminary experience with a new approach to performing an ultrasound-guided saphenous nerve block in the mid to proximal femur. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2010; 35: 222-223. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181d2458910.1097/AAP.0b013e3181d2458920216039Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Kuang MJ, Ma JX, Fu L, He WW, Zhao J, Ma XL. Is Adductor Canal Block Better than Femoral Nerve Block in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty? A GRADE Analysis of the Evidence Through a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32: 3238-3248. e3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.01510.1016/j.arth.2017.05.01528606458Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

13. Jiang X, Wang QQ, Wu CA, Tian W. Analgesic Efficacy of Adductor Canal Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. Orthop Surg 2016; 8: 294-300. doi: 10.1111/os.12268.10.1111/os.12268512951327627711Search in Google Scholar

14. Kayupov E, Okroj K, Young AC, Moric M, Luchetti TJ, Zisman, et al. Continuous Adductor Canal Blocks Provide Superior Ambulation and Pain Control Compared to Epidural Analgesia for Primary Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33: 1040-1044. e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.01310.1016/j.arth.2017.11.01329233569Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Joshi GP, Bonnet F, Shah R, Wilkinson RC, Camu F, Fischer B, et al. A systematic review of randomized trials evaluating regional techniques for postthoracotomy analgesia. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 1026-1040. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000333274.63501.ff10.1213/01.ane.0000333274.63501.ff18713924Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. Tiwari AK, Prasad A. In response to “Is continuous adductor canal block better than continuous femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty? Effect on ambulation ability, early functional recovery and pain control: a randomized controlled trial”. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30: 515. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.01210.1016/j.arth.2014.10.01225458094Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17. Mudumbai SC, Kim TE, Howard SK, Workman JJ, Giori N, Woolson S, et al. Continuous adductor canal blocks are superior to continuous femoral nerve blocks in promoting early ambulation after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472: 1377-1383. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3197-y10.1007/s11999-013-3197-y397124723897505Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Jaeger P, Nielsen ZJ, Henningsen MH, Hilsted KL, Mathiesen O, Dahl JB. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block and quadriceps strength: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 2013; 118: 409-415. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318279fa0b10.1097/ALN.0b013e318279fa0b23241723Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Jenstrup MT, Jæger P, Lund J, Fomsgaard JS, Bache S, Mathiesen O, et al. Effects of adductor-canal-blockade on pain and ambulation after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012; 56: 357-364. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02621.x10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02621.x22221014Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20. Ishiguro S, Asano N, Yoshida K, Nishimura A, Wakabayashi H, Yokochi A, et al. Day zero ambulation under modified femoral nerve block after minimally invasive surgery for total knee arthroplasty: preliminary report. J Anesth 2013; 27: 132-134. doi: 10.1007/s00540-012-1479-210.1007/s00540-012-1479-222955443Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

21. Gi E, Yamauchi M, Yamakage M, Kikuchi C, Shimizu H, Okada Y, et al. Effects of local infiltration analgesia for posterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty: comparison with sciatic nerve block. J Anesth 2014; 28: 696-701. doi: 10.1007/s00540-014-1793-y10.1007/s00540-014-1793-y24531938Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22. Zhang LK, Ma JX, Kuang MJ, Ma XL. Comparison of Periarticular Local Infiltration Analgesia With Femoral Nerve Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33: 1972-1978. e4 doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.04210.1016/j.arth.2017.12.04229455938Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

23. Singh PM, Borle A, Trikha A, Michos L, Sinha A, Goudra B. Role of Periarticular Liposomal Bupivacaine Infiltration in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty – A Meta-analysis of Comparative Trials. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32: 675-688.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.04210.1016/j.arth.2016.09.04228029532Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

24. Aikawa K, Hashimoto T, Itosu Y, Fujii T, Horiguchi T, Amenomori H, et al. Comparison of the Effect of Periarticular Infiltration Analgesia versus Sciatic Nerve Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty. Masui 2016; 65: 50-55Search in Google Scholar

25. Kovalak E, Dogan AT, Üzümcügil O, Obut A, Yildiz AS, Kanay E, et al. A comparison of continuous femoral nerve block and periarticular local infiltration analgesia in the management of early period pain developing after total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2015; 49: 260-266. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.026310.3944/AOTT.2015.14.026326200404Open DOISearch in Google Scholar