Preservice teacher disengagement with computer-based learning environments

Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., Roll, I. & Koedinger, K. R. (2004). Toward tutoring help seeking: Applying cognitive modeling to meta-cognitive skills. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 227-239).10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_22Search in Google Scholar

Aleven, V., McLaren, B., Roll, I. & Koedinger, K. (2006). Toward meta-cognitive tutoring: A model of help seeking with a Cognitive Tutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16, 101-130.Search in Google Scholar

Arroyo, I., Ferguson, K., Johns, J., Dragon, T., Meheranian, H., Fisher, D., Barto, A., Mahadevan, S. & Woolf. B. P. (2007). Repairing disengagement with non-invasive interventions. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 195-202). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar

Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Johnson, A. M., & Chauncey, A. D. (2010). Measuring cognitive and metacognitive regulatory processes during hypermedia learning: Issues and challenges. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 210-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.51593410.1080/00461520.2010.515934Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Baker, R. S.J.d., & Gowda, S. M. (2010). An analysis of the differences in the frequency of students’ disengagement in urban, rural, and suburban high schools. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 11-20).Search in Google Scholar

Baker, R. S.J.d. (2007a). Modeling and understanding students’ off-task behavior in intelligent tutoring systems. In Proceedings of ACM CHI 2007: Computer-Human Interaction (pp. 1059-1068).10.1145/1240624.1240785Search in Google Scholar

Baker, R. S.J.d. (2007b). Is gaming the system state-or-trait? Educational data mining through the multi-contextual application of a validated behavioral model. In Complete On-Line Proceedings of the Workshop on Data Mining for User Modeling at the 11th International Conference on User Modeling 2007 (pp. 76-80).Search in Google Scholar

Baker, R. S.J.d., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., Evenson, S. E., Roll, I., Wagner, A. Z., Naim, M., Raspat, J., Baker, D. J. & Beck, J. (2006). Adapting to when students game an intelligent tutoring system. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 392-401).10.1007/11774303_39Search in Google Scholar

Baker, R. S.J.d, Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R. & Wagner, A. Z. (2004). Off-task behavior in the Cognitive Tutor classroom: When students “game the system”. In Proceedings of ACM CHI 2004: Computer-Human Interaction (pp. 383-390).10.1145/985692.985741Search in Google Scholar

Baker, R. S.J.d., Rossi, L.M. (2013) Assessing the Disengaged Behaviors of Learners. In Sottilare, R., Graesser, A., Hu, X., & Holden, H. (Eds.) Design Recommendations for Adaptive Intelligent Tutoring Systems – Volume 1 – Learner Modeling. U.S. Army Research Lab, Orlando, FL, pp. 155-166, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Beal, C. R., Qu, L. & Lee, H. (2006). Classifying learner engagement through integration of multiple data sources. In Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 2-8). AAAI (American Association for Artificial Intelligence) Press.Search in Google Scholar

Beck, J. (2005). Engagement tracing: using response times to model student disengagement. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 88-95). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar

Buckley, B., Gobert, J. & Horwitz, P. (2006). Using log files to track students’ model-based inquiry. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 57-63). International Society of the Learning Sciences.Search in Google Scholar

Cocea, M., Hershkovitz, A. & Baker, R. S.J.d. (2009). The impact of off-task and gaming behaviors on learning: Immediate or aggregate? In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 507-514). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar

D’Mello, S., & Graesser, A.C. (2011). The Half-Life of Cognitive-Affective States during Complex Learning. Cognition and Emotion, 25(7), 1299-1308.10.1080/02699931.2011.613668Search in Google Scholar

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C. & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.10.3102/00346543074001059Search in Google Scholar

Gong, Y., Beck, J. E. & Heffernan, N. T. (2010). Comparing knowledge tracing and performance factor analysis by using multiple model fitting procedures. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 35-44).10.1007/978-3-642-13388-6_8Search in Google Scholar

Greer, J. & Mark, M. (2015). Evaluation Methods for Intelligent Tutoring Systems Revisited. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 389-390.Search in Google Scholar

Hannafin, M. J. (1995). Open-ended learning environments: Foundations, assumptions, and implications for automated design. In R. Tennyson, A.E. Barron (Ed.), Automating Instructional Design: Computer-Based Development and Delivery Tools (pp. 101-129). New York: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-57821-2_5Search in Google Scholar

Hershkovitz, A., Baker, R. S.J.d., Gobert, J., Wixon, M., Sao Pedro, M. (2013). Discovery with Models: A Case Study on Carelessness in Computer-based Science Inquiry. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1480-1499.10.1177/0002764213479365Search in Google Scholar

Hill, J., & Land, S. (1998). Open-ended learning environments: A theoretical framework and model for design. In M. Simonsen (Ed.), Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. St Louis, MO: AECT. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED423839.Search in Google Scholar

Johns, J., & Woolf, B. (2006). A dynamic mixture model to detect student motivation and proficiency. In Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 163-168). AAAI (American Association for Artificial Intelligence) Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lajoie, S. P., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Teaching and learning in technology-rich environments. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed.) (pp. 803-821). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Land, S. M. (2000). Cognitive requirements for learning with open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 61-78.10.1007/BF02319858Search in Google Scholar

McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & Roscoe, R. (2013). Natural language processing in an intelligent writing strategy tutoring system. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 499-515. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0258-1.10.3758/s13428-012-0258-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Muldner, K., Burleson, W., Van de Sande, B. & VanLehn, K. (2011). An analysis of students’ gaming behaviors in an intelligent tutoring system: Predictors and impacts. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 21(1-2), 99-135.10.1007/s11257-010-9086-0Search in Google Scholar

Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2014). Introduction to emotions in education. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook series. International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 1-10). New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.10.4324/9780203148211Search in Google Scholar

Poitras, E. G., Doleck, T., & Lajoie, S. P. (2018). Modeling student teachers’ information seeking behaviors: Implications for adaptive scaffolding of lesson planning. Paper presented at the 2018 American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. New York, NY.Search in Google Scholar

Poitras, E. G., & Fazeli, N. (2017). Simulating preservice teachers’ information-seeking behaviors while learning with an intelligent web browser. Paper presented at the 2017 Society for Information Technology and Teacher Educational annual conference. Austin, TX.Search in Google Scholar

Poitras, E., & Fazeli, N. (2016). Mining the Edublogosphere to Enhance Teacher Professional Development. In Shalin Hai-Jew (Ed.), Social Media Data Extraction and Content Analysis. IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-5225-0648-5.ch002Search in Google Scholar

Poitras, E., Doleck, T., Huang, L., Li, S., & Lajoie, S. (2017). Advancing Teacher Technology Education Using Open-Ended Learning Environments as Research and Training Platforms. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 32-45.10.14742/ajet.3498Search in Google Scholar

Poitras, E., Doleck, T., Huang, L., Li, S., & Lajoie, S. (2018). nBrowser: An Intelligent Web Browser for Studying Self-Regulated Learning in Teachers’ Use of Technology. In Robert Zheng (Ed.), Strategies for Deep Learning with Digital Technology: Theories and Practices in Education. Nova Science Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Poitras, E., Fazeli, N., & Mayne, Z. (2018). Modeling Student Teachers’ Information-Seeking Behaviors while Learning with Network-Based Tutors. Journal of Educational Technology & Society.10.1177/0047239518797086Search in Google Scholar

Poitras, E., Mayne, Z., Huang, L., Doleck, T., Udy, L., & Lajoie, S. (2018). Simulated student behaviors with intelligent tutoring systems: Applications for authoring and evaluating network-based tutors. In Scotty Craig (Ed.), Tutoring and Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Nova Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Rowe, J., McQuiggan, S., Robison, J. & Lester, J. (2009). Off-task behavior in narrative-centered learning environments. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 99-106). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar

Sabourin, J., Rowe, J., Mott, B. & Lester, J. (2011). When off-task is on-task: The affective role of off-task behavior in narrative-centered learning environments. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 534-536). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_93Search in Google Scholar

Shute, V. J., & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2012). Adaptive educational systems. In P. Durlach (Ed.), Adaptive technologies for training and education (pp. 7-27). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139049580.004Search in Google Scholar

Sottilare, R., Graesser, A., Hu, X., & Holden, H. (Eds.). (2013). Design recommendations for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Orlando, FL: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.Search in Google Scholar

Vanlehn, K., Ohlsson, S., & Nason, R. (1994). Applications of simulated students: An exploration. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5(2), 135-175.Search in Google Scholar

Walonoski, J. A. & Heffernan, N. T. (2006). Prevention of off-task gaming behavior in intelligent tutoring systems. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 722-724). Springer-Verlag: Berlin.10.1007/11774303_80Search in Google Scholar

Wixon, M., d Baker, R. S., Gobert, J. D., Ocumpaugh, J., & Bachmann, M. (2012, July). WTF? detecting students who are conducting inquiry without thinking fastidiously. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (pp. 286-296). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-642-31454-4_24Search in Google Scholar