Inquiry and computer program Onko-Online: 25 years of clinical registry for breast cancer at the University Medical Centre Maribor

1 Cancer in Slovenia 2015 Ljubljana: Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, Cancer Registry of Republic of Slovenia; 2018. Cancer in Slovenia 2015 Ljubljana Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, Cancer Registry of Republic of Slovenia 2018Search in Google Scholar

2 Hočevar M. Klinični registri v onkologiji. Onkologija 2011; 15: 14-7. Hočevar M. Klinični registri v onkologiji Onkologija 2011 15 14 7Search in Google Scholar

3 Clinical register of skin melanoma. In Cancer Registry of Republic of Slovenia, editor. Epidemiology and Cancer Registry. [cited 2019 Jan 15]. Available at: https://www.onko-i.si/eng/ Clinical register of skin melanoma In Cancer Registry of Republic of Slovenia, editor. Epidemiology and Cancer Registry [cited 2019 Jan 15]. Available at https://www.onko-i.si/eng/Search in Google Scholar

4 Takač I, Ferletič M, Arko D, Gorišek B. Follow-up computer program for patients with ovarian malignancy In: Bigec M, Lavrenčič D, Kokol P, editors. Zbornik referatov II del. Inform Med Slov Print 1996; 3: 43-6. Takač I Ferletič M Arko D Gorišek B Follow-up computer program for patients with ovarian malignancy In: Bigec M, Lavrenčič D, Kokol P, editors Zbornik referatov II del. Inform Med Slov Print 1996 3 43 6Search in Google Scholar

5 Takač I, Gorišek B. User friendly inquiry and computer program for following patients with ovarian malignancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1999; 263: 60-7. PMID: 10728632 Takač I Gorišek B User friendly inquiry and computer program for following patients with ovarian malignancy Arch Gynecol Obstet 1999 263 60 7 PMID: 1072863210.1007/s00404005026410728632Search in Google Scholar

6 Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58 209 women with breast cancer and 101 986 women without the disease. Lancet 2001; 358: 1389-99. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06524-2 Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58 209 women with breast cancer and 101 986 women without the disease Lancet 2001 358 1389 99 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06524-211705483Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7 Brewer HR, Jones ME, Schoemaker MJ, Ashworth A, Swerdlow AJ. Family history and risk of breast cancer: an analysis accounting for family structure. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 165: 193-200. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4325-2 Brewer HR Jones ME Schoemaker MJ Ashworth A Swerdlow AJ Family history and risk of breast cancer: an analysis accounting for family structure Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017 165 193 200 10.1007/s10549-017-4325-2551131328578505Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8 Clavel-Chapelon F, Gerber M. Reproductive factors and breast cancer risk. Do they differ according to age at diagnosis? Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002; 72: 107-15. PMID: 12038701 Clavel-Chapelon F Gerber M Reproductive factors and breast cancer risk Do they differ according to age at diagnosis? Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002 72 107 15 PMID: 1203870110.1016/1047-2797(95)00099-S8520715Search in Google Scholar

9 Chowdhury R, Sinha B, Sankar MJ, Taneja S, Bhandari N, Rollins N, et al. Breastfeeding and maternal health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr 2015; 104: 96-113. doi: 10.1111/apa.13102 Chowdhury R Sinha B Sankar MJ Taneja S Bhandari N Rollins N et al Breastfeeding and maternal health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Acta Paediatr 2015 104 96 113 10.1111/apa.13102467048326172878Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10 Mørch LS, Skovlund CW, Hannaford PC, Iversen L, Fielding S, Lidegaard Ø. Contemporary hormonal contraception and the risk of breast cancer. N Eng J Med 2017; 377: 2228-39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700732 Mørch LS Skovlund CW Hannaford PC Iversen L Fielding S Lidegaard Ø Contemporary hormonal contraception and the risk of breast cancer N Eng J Med 2017 377 2228 39 10.1056/NEJMoa170073229211679Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

11 Jones ME, Schoemaker MJ, Wright L, McFadde E, Griffin J, Thomas D, et al. Menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer: what is the true size of the increased risk? Br J Cancer 2016; 115: 607-15. doi: 10.1038/ bjc.2016.231 Jones ME Schoemaker MJ Wright L McFadde E Griffin J Thomas D et al Menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer: what is the true size of the increased risk? Br J Cancer 2016 115 607 15 10.1038/ bjc.2016.231Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12 Lerner-Geva L, Rabinovici J, Olmer L, Blumstein T, Mashiach S, Lunenfeld B. Are infertility treatments a potential risk factor for cancer development? Perspective of 30 years of follow-up. Gynecol Endocrinol 2012; 10: 809-14. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2012.671391 Lerner-Geva L Rabinovici J Olmer L Blumstein T Mashiach S Lunenfeld B Are infertility treatments a potential risk factor for cancer development? Perspective of 30 years of follow-up Gynecol Endocrinol 2012 10 809 14 10.3109/09513590.2012.67139122475084Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

13 Cetin I, Cozzi V, Antonazzo P. Infertility as a cancer risk factor - a review. Placenta 2008; 29(Suppl B): 169-77. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2008.08.007 Cetin I Cozzi V Antonazzo P Infertility as a cancer risk factor - a review Placenta 2008 29Suppl B 169 77 10.1016/j.placenta.2008.08.00718790330Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14 Castburg C, Miller AB, Rohan TE. Active cigarette smoking and risk of breast cancer. Int J Cancer 2015; 136: 2204-9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29266 Castburg C Miller AB Rohan TE Active cigarette smoking and risk of breast cancer Int J Cancer 2015 136 2204 9 10.1002/ijc.2926625307527Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15 Liu Y, Nguyen N, Colditz GA. Links between alcohol consumption and breast cancer: a look at the evidence. Womens Health (Lond) 2015; 1: 65-77. doi: 10.2217/whe.14.62 Liu Y Nguyen N Colditz GA Links between alcohol consumption and breast cancer: a look at the evidence Womens Health (Lond) 2015 1 65 77 10.2217/whe.14.62429975825581056Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16 Munsell MF, Sprague BL, Berry DA, Chisholm G, Trentham-Dietz A. Body mass index and breast cancer risk according to postmenopausal estrogen-progestin use and hormone receptor status. Epidem Rev 2014; 36: 114-36. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxt010 Munsell MF Sprague BL Berry DA Chisholm G Trentham-Dietz A Body mass index and breast cancer risk according to postmenopausal estrogen-progestin use and hormone receptor status Epidem Rev 2014 36 114 36 10.1093/epirev/mxt010387384424375928Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17 Žgajnar J, Marinko T, Šeruga B. Rak dojk. In Strojan P, Hočevar M, editors Onkologija [cited 2019 Jan 15]. Available at: www.onko-i.si/ucbenik_onkologija Ljubljana 2018. p. 508-37. Žgajnar J Marinko T Šeruga B Rak dojk In Strojan P Hočevar M editors Onkologija [cited 2019 Jan 15]. Available at www.onko-i.si/ucbenik_onkologija Ljubljana 2018. p 508 37Search in Google Scholar

18 Güth U, Magaton I, Huang DJ, Fisher R, Schötzau A, Vette M. Primary and secondary distant metastatic breast cancer: two sides of the same coin. Breast 2014; 23: 26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.10.007 Güth U Magaton I Huang DJ Fisher R Schötzau A Vette M Primary and secondary distant metastatic breast cancer: two sides of the same coin Breast 2014 23 26 32 10.1016/j.breast.2013.10.00724215983Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19 Provencer L, Hogue JC, Desbiens C, Poirier B, Poirier E, Bodreau D, et al. Is clinical examination important for breast cancer detection? Curr Oncol 2016; 4: 332-9. doi: 10.3747/co.23.2881 Provencer L Hogue JC Desbiens C Poirier B Poirier E Bodreau D et al Is clinical examination important for breast cancer detection? Curr Oncol 2016 4 332 9 10.3747/co.23.2881497403927536182Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20 Kim GR, Choi JS, Han BK, Lee JE, Nan SJ, Ko EY, et al. Preoperative axillary US in early-stage breast cancer: potential to prevent unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection. Radiology 2018; 288: 55-63. doi: 10.1148/ radiol.2018171987 Kim GR Choi JS Han BK Lee JE Nan SJ Ko EY et al Preoperative axillary US in early-stage breast cancer: potential to prevent unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection Radiology 2018 288 55 63 10.1148/ radiol.2018171987Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

21 Ibrahim-Zada I, Grant CS, Glazebrooke KN, Boughey JC. Preoperative axillary ultrasound in breast cancer: safely avoiding frozen section of sentinel lymph nodes in breast conserving surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 217: 7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.01.064 Ibrahim-Zada I Grant CS Glazebrooke KN Boughey JC Preoperative axillary ultrasound in breast cancer: safely avoiding frozen section of sentinel lymph nodes in breast conserving surgery J Am Coll Surg 2013 217 7 15 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.01.064369133223628226Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22 Blatnik A, Perhavec A, Gazić B, Vidergar-Kralj B, Matos E, Ratoša I, et al. [Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer]. [Slovenian]. Ljubljana: Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, 2018. [cited 2019 Jan 15]. Available at: https://www.onko-i.si/fileadmin/onko/datoteke/Smernice/Smernice_diagnostike_in_zdravljenja_raka_dojk_2018.pdf Blatnik A Perhavec A Gazić B Vidergar-Kralj B Matos E Ratoša I et al [Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer]. [Slovenian] Ljubljana Institute of Oncology Ljubljana 2018 [cited 2019 Jan 15]. Available at https://www.onko-i.si/fileadmin/onko/datoteke/Smernice/Smernice_diagnostike_in_zdravljenja_raka_dojk_2018.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

23 O’Halloran N, Lowery A, Kalinina O, Sweeney K, Malone C, McLoughlin R, et al. Trends in breast reconstruction practices in a specialized breast tertiary referral centre. BJS Open 2017; 5: 148-57. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.23 O’Halloran N Lowery A Kalinina O Sweeney K Malone C McLoughlin R et al Trends in breast reconstruction practices in a specialized breast tertiary referral centre BJS Open 2017 5 148 57 10.1002/bjs5.23598996129951617Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

24 Platt J, Baxter N, Zhong T. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer. CMAJ 2011; 18: 2109-16. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110513 Platt J Baxter N Zhong T Breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer CMAJ 2011 18 2109 16 10.1503/cmaj.110513325514322065359Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

25 Moschetta M, Telegrafo M, Carluccio DA, Jablonska JP, Rella L, Serio G, et al. Comparison between fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and core biopsy (CNB) in the diagnostic of breast. G Chir 2014; 35: 171-6. PMID: 25174291 Moschetta M Telegrafo M Carluccio DA Jablonska JP Rella L Serio G et al Comparison between fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and core biopsy (CNB) in the diagnostic of breast G Chir 2014 35 171 6 PMID: 2517429110.11138/gchir/2014.35.7.171Search in Google Scholar

26 Wang M, He X, Chang Y, Sun G, Thabane L. A sensitivity and specific comparison of fine needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in evaluation of suspicious breast lesion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast 2017; 31: 157-66. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.11.009 Wang M He X Chang Y Sun G Thabane L A sensitivity and specific comparison of fine needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in evaluation of suspicious breast lesion: a systematic review and meta-analysis Breast 2017 31 157 66 10.1016/j.breast.2016.11.00927866091Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

27 Zhan QH, Fu JQ, Fu FM, Zhang J, Wang C. Survival and time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy among breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2017; 9: 2739-51. doi: 10.18632/ oncotarget.23086 Zhan QH Fu JQ Fu FM Zhang J Wang C Survival and time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy among breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis Oncotarget 2017 9 2739 51 10.18632/ oncotarget.23086Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

28 Flores-Balcázar CH, Flores-Luna L, Villarreal-Garza C, Mota-García A, Bargalló-Rocha E. Impact of delayed adjuvant radiotherapy in the survival of women with breast cancer. Cureus 2018; 10: e3071. doi: 10.7759/ cureus.3071 Flores-Balcázar CH Flores-Luna L Villarreal-Garza C Mota-García A Bargalló-Rocha E Impact of delayed adjuvant radiotherapy in the survival of women with breast cancer Cureus 2018 10 e3071 10.7759/ cureus.3071Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

29 WHO. Handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment Geneva: World Health Organisation Offset Publication; 1979. p. 48. WHO Handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment Geneva World Health Organisation Offset Publication 1979 p 48Search in Google Scholar

30 Ollivier L, Padhani AR, Leclere J. International criteria for measurement tumor response. Cancer Imaging 2001; 2: 31-2. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2001.017 Ollivier L Padhani AR Leclere J International criteria for measurement tumor response Cancer Imaging 2001 2 31 2 10.1102/1470-7330.2001.017Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

31 Subbiah V, Chuang HH, Gambhire D, Kairemo K. Defining clinical response criteria and early response criteria for precision oncology: current state-of-the-art and future perspective. Diagnostics (Basel) 2017; 7: pii: E10. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics7010010 Subbiah V Chuang HH Gambhire D Kairemo K Defining clinical response criteria and early response criteria for precision oncology: current state-of-the-art and future perspective Diagnostics (Basel) 2017 7 pii E10 10.3390/diagnostics7010010537301928212290Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

32 Lafranconi A, Pylkkänen L, Deandra S, Bramesfeld A, Lerda D, Neamtiu L, et al. Intensive follow-up for women with breast cancer: review of clinical, economic and patient’s preference domains through evidence to decision framework. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2017; 15: 206. doi 10.1186/s12955-017-0779-5 Lafranconi A Pylkkänen L Deandra S Bramesfeld A Lerda D Neamtiu L et al Intensive follow-up for women with breast cancer: review of clinical, economic and patient’s preference domains through evidence to decision framework Health Qual Life Outcomes 2017 15 206 10.1186/s12955-017-0779-5564908529052503Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

33 Lu WL, Jansen L, Post WJ, Bonnema J, Van de Velde JC, De Bock GH. Impact on survival of early detection of isolated breast recurrences after the primary treatment for breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009; 3: 403-12. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0023-4 Lu WL Jansen L Post WJ Bonnema J Van de Velde JC De Bock GH Impact on survival of early detection of isolated breast recurrences after the primary treatment for breast cancer: a meta-analysis Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009 3 403 12 10.1007/s10549-008-0023-418421576Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

34 De Bock GH, Bonnema J, Van der Hage J, Kievit J, Van de Velde CJ. Effectiveness of routine visits and routine tests in detecting isolated locoregional recurrences after treatment for early-stage invasive breast cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 4010-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.080 De Bock GH Bonnema J Van der Hage J Kievit J Van de Velde CJ Effectiveness of routine visits and routine tests in detecting isolated locoregional recurrences after treatment for early-stage invasive breast cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review J Clin Oncol 2004 22 4010 8 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.08015459225Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

35 Feiten S, Dünnebacke J, Friesenhahn V, Heymanns J, Köppler H, Meister R, et al. Follow-up reality for breast cancer patients – standardised survey of patients and physicians and analysis of treatment data. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016; 5: 557-63. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-106210 Feiten S Dünnebacke J Friesenhahn V Heymanns J Köppler H Meister R et al Follow-up reality for breast cancer patients – standardised survey of patients and physicians and analysis of treatment data Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016 5 557 63 10.1055/s-0042-106210487329427239065Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

36 Chopra I, Chopra A. Follow-up care for breast cancer survivors: improving patient outcomes. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 2014; 5: 71-85. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S49586 Chopra I Chopra A Follow-up care for breast cancer survivors: improving patient outcomes Patient Relat Outcome Meas 2014 5 71 85 10.2147/PROM.S49586415600025210481Open DOISearch in Google Scholar