[1. Anonymous, (2007), Introductory Models and Basic Concepts: Lasswell. The Lasswell Formula.http://www.google. Retrieved: 1/24/2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Blair, M.G., Jones, S.R. & Simpson, H.R. (1975), Educational Psychology. Macmillan Publishing Co; Inc. New York, U.S.A.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Bowers, J. (1973), Action Research and The Production of Communication Media, In R. Varma, S.L. Ghosal, J. Bowers, and R.H. Hull (eds), Action Research and The Production of Communication Media. Report on the All]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Field Workshop on Action Research in Agricultural Information Communication, Udaipur, 10-20 September, 1973. Typographic Unit, University of Reading, England.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. David, L. (2015). “Paradigms in Learning Theories. https://www.learningtheories.com/paradigms. Retrieved: 6/3/2019.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Ebigbagha, (2016). Graphic Encoding Choices in Development Communication: Identifying the Several Loops of the Graphic Encoder/Media Team Collaboration. Lap Lambert Academic Publishing - Ominiscriptum, Gmb & Co. KG Germany.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Ebigbagha, S.Z. (2016b). Graphic Communication for Sustainable Development: Eliciting Desired Response from Target Audience. In Ebohon, O.J., Ayeni, D.A., Egbu, C.O., and Omole, F.K, Process of the Joint International Conference (JIC) on 21st Century Human Habitat: Issues, Sustainability and Development, 21-24 March 2016, Akure, Nigeria Pp. 1045-1052.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Ebigbagha, (2019). The Laswell Formula: Implications for Graphic Communication in Development Initiatives. Journal of Ceramics and Environmental Design. Vol. 6, No.2, p. 215-232.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Ejembi, E.A. (1989), Graphic Communication in Development Programmes: Models for Communicators. An Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Typography and Graphic Communication, University of Reading, England.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Lidwell, W. Holden, K. & Butler, J. (2013). Universal Principles of Design. Rockport. Beverly, Massachusetts, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Machado, M. (2002), Information Processing and Other Hierarchy of Effects Theories. 382J: theories of Persuasive communication and Consumer Decision Making. University of Texas at Austin, Fall 2002. corbis.com.http://www.google.ie Retrieved: 1/24/2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. McGuire, W.J. (1989), Theoretical Foundations of Campaigns. In Rice, R.E.; and Atkin, C.K. (ed.), Public Communication Campaigns; Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California, U.S.A.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. McGuire, W.J. (1999), Constructing Social Psychology: Creative and Critical Processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.10.1017/CBO9780511571206]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Myers, D.G. (2002), Social Psychology. McGraw-Hill, New York, U.S.A. Scholten, M. (1996), Lost and Found: the Information-Processing Model of Advertising Effectiveness. Journal of Business Research, 37, p. 97-104.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Society for Family Health, (2006), Corporate Presentation. Society for Family Health, Abuja, Nigeria.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Watt, J.H. (1979), Television Form, Content Attributes, and Viewer Behaviour. In Voigt, J.M., and Hanneman, J.G. (ed.), Progress in Communication Sciences, Volume I, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, New Jersey, U.S.A. World Health Organisation (1987), Communication – A Guide for managers of National Diarrhoeal Disease Control Programmes. World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Wright, P. (1981), Problems to be Solved when Creating Usable Documents, MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge, England.]Search in Google Scholar
