<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The purpose of this study was to identify compatibilities of land-use patterns resulting from adjacent functions within the rural commune of Oleśnica. The analysis was made based on the relevant studies of conditions and directions of spatial planning, as well as a field inventory. The results of the studies show that the applicable planning document became a potential source of spatial conflicts. On these grounds, a negative assessment was given to the functioning spatial planning system, which, according to the premises of spatial order and sustainable development, should prevent them. The existing incompatibilities are the result of issues with coordination of the local spatial policies. As a consequence, they cause an urban development chaos, lack of proper space shaping, environmental damage and lower the residents‘ quality of life.</p></abstract>

The purpose of this study was to identify compatibilities of land-use patterns resulting from adjacent functions within the rural commune of Oleśnica. The analysis was made based on the relevant studies of conditions and directions of spatial planning, as well as a field inventory. The results of the studies show that the applicable planning document became a potential source of spatial conflicts. On these grounds, a negative assessment was given to the functioning spatial planning system, which, according to the premises of spatial order and sustainable development, should prevent them. The existing incompatibilities are the result of issues with coordination of the local spatial policies. As a consequence, they cause an urban development chaos, lack of proper space shaping, environmental damage and lower the residents‘ quality of life.

Potential Conflicts in the Land-Use Planning Process: A Case Study of the Rural Commune of Oleśnica (Poland)

Quaestiones Geographicae

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

The purpose of this study was to identify compatibilities of land-use patterns resulting from adjacent functions within the rural commune of Oleśnica. The...

No.	Communes rural (r), urban (u), urban-rural (ur)	Number of segments of different functions connected	Is the real development consistent with the intended use of the land?
No.	Communes rural (r), urban (u), urban-rural (ur)	Number of segments of different functions connected	Yes	No
1	Oleśnica (r)	255	200	55
2	Oleśnica (u)	61	30	31
3	Długołęka (r)	48	40	8
4	Dobroszyce (r)	37	32	5
5	Bierutów (ur)	36	30	6
6	Syców (ur)	35	32	3
7	Twardogóra (ur)	15	9	6
8	Dziadowa-Kłoda (r)	10	10	0
9	Czernica (r)	9	9	0
10	Jelcz-Laskowice (ur)	4	3	1
Total		510	395	115

No.	Communes rural (r), urban (u), urban-rural (ur)	Number of connected sections with different functions	Number of incompatible sections (SUiKZP)	Number of incompatible sections (actual development)
1	Oleśnica (r) – Oleśnica (u)	61	36	7
2	Oleśnica (r) – Długołęka (r)	48	10	2
3	Oleśnica (r) – Dobroszyce (r)	37	10	5
4	Oleśnica (r) – Bierutów (ur)	36	7	0
5	Oleśnica (r) – Syców (ur)	35	9	1
6	Oleśnica (r) – Twardogóra (ur)	15	5	3
7	Oleśnica (r) – Dziadowa-Kłoda (r)	10	0	0
8	Oleśnica (r) – Czernica (r)	9	1	0
9	Oleśnica (r) – Jelcz-Laskowice (ur)	4	1	0
Total		255	79	18

	MN	MW	U	US	UC	U/P	MN/U	MW/U	R	RU	RM	P	PG	ZN	ZL	ZP	ZD	ZC	WS	KD	TK	TZ	KL
MN	0	0	1	0	1	2	0	0	2	2	2	2	2	2	1	0	2	1	1	1	1	1	1
MW	0	0	1	0	1	2	0	0	2	2	2	2	2	2	1	0	2	1	1	1	1	1	1
U	1	1	0	1	0	0	1	1	1	1	1	0	0	2	1	1	1	1	1	0	0	1	0
US	0	0	1	0	1	2	0	0	2	2	2	2	2	1	2	0	2	1	0	1	0	1	1
UC	1	1	0	1	0	0	1	1	1	1	1	0	1	2	1	1	1	1	1	0	0	1	0
U/P	2	2	0	2	0	0	2	2	2	2	2	0	0	2	2	1	2	1	1	0	0	1	0
MN/U	0	0	1	0	1	2	0	0	1	1	2	2	2	2	1	0	2	1	1	1	1	1	1
MW/U	0	0	1	0	1	2	0	0	2	2	2	2	2	2	1	0	2	1	1	1	1	1	1
R	2	2	1	2	1	2	2	2	0	0	0	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0
RU	2	2	1	2	1	2	2	2	0	0	0	2	2	1	0	1	0	1	1	1	0	1	1
RM	2	2	1	2	1	2	2	2	0	0	0	2	2	1	0	0	0	1	1	1	0	1	1
P	2	2	0	2	0	0	2	2	2	2	2	0	0	2	2	1	2	1	1	0	0	1	1
PG	2	2	0	2	1	0	2	2	2	2	2	0	0	1	2	1	2	1	1	0	0	1	1
ZN	2	2	2	1	2	2	2	2	0	1	1	2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	1
ZL	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	0	0	0	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	1
ZP	0	0	1	0	1	1	0	0	0	1	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	0
ZD	2	2	1	2	1	2	2	2	0	0	0	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	0
ZC	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	1	1
WS	1	1	1	0	1	1	1	1	0	1	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
KD	1	1	0	1	0	0	1	1	1	1	1	0	0	1	1	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0
TK	1	1	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
TZ	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	0	1	1	1	1	0	0	1	1	1	0	0	0	0
KL	1	1	0	1	0	0	1	1	0	1	1	1	1	1	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0

Potential Conflicts in the Land-Use Planning Process: A Case Study of the Rural Commune of Oleśnica (Poland)

Published Online: Jun 11, 2020

Page range: 129 - 137

Received: Feb 10, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2020-0018

Keywords
spatial conflicts, spatial planning, sustained development, Oleśnica rural commune

© 2020 Anna Grochowska et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Number of sections of consistent and inconsistent actual land use planning.

Number of incompatible sections in border areas.

Compatibility matrix of land use allocations.

Potential Conflicts in the Land-Use Planning Process: A Case Study of the Rural Commune of Oleśnica (Poland)

Published Online: Jun 11, 2020

Page range: 129 - 137

Received: Feb 10, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2020-0018

Keywordsspatial conflicts, spatial planning, sustained development, Oleśnica rural commune

© 2020 Anna Grochowska et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Number of sections of consistent and inconsistent actual land use planning.

Number of incompatible sections in border areas.

Compatibility matrix of land use allocations.

Keywords
spatial conflicts, spatial planning, sustained development, Oleśnica rural commune