This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Bel G., Fageda X., 2013. Why do municipalities cooperate to provide local public services? An empirical analysis. Local Government Studies 39(3): 435–454. DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2013.781024BelG.FagedaX.2013Why do municipalities cooperate to provide local public services? An empirical analysisLocal Government Studies39343545410.1080/03003930.2013.781024Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Blaeschke F., 2014. What drives small municipalities to cooperate? Evidence from Hessian muncipalities. Universität Marburg.BlaeschkeF.2014What drives small municipalities to cooperate? Evidence from Hessian muncipalitiesUniversität MarburgSearch in Google Scholar
Blom-Hansen J., Houlberg K., Serritzlew S., Treisman D., 2016. Jurisdiction size and local government policy expenditures: Assessing the effect of municipal amalgamation. American Political Review 110(4): 812–831. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055416000320.Blom-HansenJ.HoulbergK.SerritzlewS.TreismanD.2016Jurisdiction size and local government policy expenditures: Assessing the effect of municipal amalgamationAmerican Political Review110481283110.1017/S0003055416000320Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bolgherini S., 2011. Local government and inter-municipal co-operation in Italy and Germany. Justus-Liebig-Universität, Gießen.BolgheriniS.2011Local government and inter-municipal co-operation in Italy and GermanyJustus-Liebig-UniversitätGießenSearch in Google Scholar
Bryson P.J., Cornia G.C., Wheeler G.E., 2004. Fiscal decentralization in the Czech and Slovak republics: A comparative study of moral hazard. Environmental and Planning C: Politics and Space 22(1): 103–113. DOI: 10.1068/c0247.BrysonP.J.CorniaG.C.WheelerG.E.2004Fiscal decentralization in the Czech and Slovak republics: A comparative study of moral hazardEnvironmental and Planning C: Politics and Space22110311310.1068/c0247Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
ČSÚ – Český statistický úřad (Czech Statistical Office), 2017. Small lexicon of municipalities in the Czech Republic – 2017. Municipalities of the Czech Republic as at 1 January 2017. Online: czso.cz/csu/czso/maly-lexikon-obci-ceske-re-publiky-2017 (accessed: 8 January 2019).ČSÚ – Český statistický úřad (Czech Statistical Office)2017Small lexicon of municipalities in the Czech Republic – 2017. Municipalities of the Czech Republic as at 1 January 2017czso.cz/csu/czso/maly-lexikon-obci-ceske-re-publiky-2017accessed: 8 January 2019)Search in Google Scholar
ČSÚ (Czech Statistical Office), 2016a. Size groups of municipalities – number of municipalities. Online: vdb.czso.cz/vdbvo2/faces/cs/index.jsf?page=vystup-objekt&pvo=RSO08a&z=T&f=TABULKA&skupId=746&kat-alog=30829&pvo=RSO08a&str=v394 (accessed: 8 January 2019).ČSÚ (Czech Statistical Office)2016aSize groups of municipalities – number of municipalitiesvdb.czso.cz/vdbvo2/faces/cs/index.jsf?page=vystup-objekt&pvo=RSO08a&z=T&f=TABULKA&skupId=746&kat-alog=30829&pvo=RSO08a&str=v394accessed: 8 January 2019Search in Google Scholar
ČSÚ (Czech Statistical Office), 2016b. Size groups of municipalities - territorial comparison. Online: vdb.czso.cz/vd-bvo2/faces/cs/index.jsf?page=vystup-objekt-parame-try&pvo=RSO02&sp=A&pvokc=&katalog=30829&z=T (accessed: 8 January 2019).ČSÚ (Czech Statistical Office)2016bSize groups of municipalities - territorial comparisonvdb.czso.cz/vd-bvo2/faces/cs/index.jsf?page=vystup-objekt-parame-try&pvo=RSO02&sp=A&pvokc=&katalog=30829&z=Taccessed: 8 January 2019Search in Google Scholar
ČSÚ (Czech Statistical Office), 2009. Position of rural areas in regions of the Czech Republic. Online: czso.cz/csu/czso/postaveni_venkova_v_krajich_cr (accessed: 8 January 2019).ČSÚ (Czech Statistical Office)2009Position of rural areas in regions of the Czech Republicczso.cz/csu/czso/postaveni_venkova_v_krajich_craccessed: 8 January 2019Search in Google Scholar
Fialová D., 2001. Druhé bydlení a jeho vztah k periferním oblastem (Second housing and its relation to peripheral areas). Geografie 106(1): 36–47.FialováD.2001Druhé bydlení a jeho vztah k periferním oblastem (Second housing and its relation to peripheral areas)Geografie1061364710.37040/geografie2001106010036Search in Google Scholar
Filipe M., de Mascarenhas J.M., 2011. Abandoned villages and related geographic and landscape context: Guidelines to natural and cultural heritage conservation and multifunctional valorization. European Countryside 3(1): 21–45. DOI: 10.2478/v10091-011-0002-3.FilipeM.de MascarenhasJ.M.2011Abandoned villages and related geographic and landscape context: Guidelines to natural and cultural heritage conservation and multifunctional valorizationEuropean Countryside31214510.2478/v10091-011-0002-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Haartsen T., Venhorst V., 2010. Planning for decline: Anticipating on population decline in the Netherlands. Tijd-schrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 101(2): 218–227. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2010.00597.x.HaartsenT.VenhorstV.2010Planning for decline: Anticipating on population decline in the NetherlandsTijd-schrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie101221822710.1111/j.1467-9663.2010.00597.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hampl M., Müller J., 1998. Jsou obce v České republice příliš malé? (Are municipalities too small?) Geografie – sborník České geografické společnosti 103(1): 1–12.HamplM.MüllerJ.1998Jsou obce v České republice příliš malé? (Are municipalities too small?)Geografie – sborník České geografické společnosti103111210.37040/geografie1998103010001Search in Google Scholar
Holzer M., Fry J., Charbonneau E., Ryzin G., Wang T., 2009. Literarure review and analysis related to optimal municipal size and efficiency (research report). Rutgers University, Camden.HolzerM.FryJ.CharbonneauE.RyzinG.WangT.2009Literarure review and analysis related to optimal municipal size and efficiency(research report)Rutgers UniversityCamdenSearch in Google Scholar
Jakešová L., Vaishar A., 2012. Sustainable inner peripheries? A case study of the Olešnice micro-region (Czech Republic). Moravian Geographical Reports 20(4): 13–25.JakešováL.VaisharA.2012Sustainable inner peripheries? A case study of the Olešnice micro-region (Czech Republic)Moravian Geographical Reports2041325Search in Google Scholar
Kadeřábková J., Jetmar M., 2010. Selected issues of the development of small municipalities in the Czech Republic, financing of municipalities. European Countryside 2(2): 102–117. DOI: 10.2478/v10091-010-0008-2.KadeřábkováJ.JetmarM.2010Selected issues of the development of small municipalities in the Czech Republic, financing of municipalitiesEuropean Countryside2210211710.2478/v10091-010-0008-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Karder B., 2014. Incorporation of municipalities and population growth: A propensity score matching approach. Papers in Regional Science 95(3): 539–554. DOI: 10.1111/ pirs.12148.KarderB.2014Incorporation of municipalities and population growth: A propensity score matching approachPapers in Regional Science95353955410.1111/pirs.12148Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Klimovský D., Mejere O., Mikolaityte J., Pinterič U., Saparniene D., 2014. Inter-municipal cooperation in Lithuania and Slovakia: Does size structure matter? Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government 12(3): 643–658. DOI: 10.4335/12.3.643-658.KlimovskýD.MejereO.MikolaityteJ.PinteričU.SaparnieneD.2014Inter-municipal cooperation in Lithuania and Slovakia: Does size structure matter?Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government12364365810.4335/12.3.643-658Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lorvi K., 2013. Unpacking administrative capacity for the management of EU Structural Funds in small and large municipalities: The Estonian case. Administrative Culture 13(1): 98–124.LorviK.2013Unpacking administrative capacity for the management of EU Structural Funds in small and large municipalities: The Estonian caseAdministrative Culture13198124Search in Google Scholar
Martins M.R., 1995. Size of municipalities, efficiency, and citizen participation: A cross-European perspective. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 13(4): 441–458. DOI: 10.1068/c130441.MartinsM.R.1995Size of municipalities, efficiency, and citizen participation: A cross-European perspectiveEnvironment and Planning C: Politics and Space13444145810.1068/c130441Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Matějová L., Němec J., Soukopová J., 2016. “Small is beautiful”. Pros and cons of territorial fragmentation on the example of the Czech Republic. In: Sadioglu U., Dede K. (eds), Comparative studies and regionally focussed cases examining local governments. IGI Global, Hershey, PA: 113–134.MatějováL.NěmecJ.SoukopováJ.2016“Small is beautiful”. Pros and cons of territorial fragmentation on the example of the Czech RepublicSadiogluU.DedeK.Comparative studies and regionally focussed cases examining local governmentsIGI GlobalHershey, PA11313410.4018/978-1-5225-0320-0.ch006Search in Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic, 2016. Report on the State of Agriculture of the Czech Republic for 2015. “Green Report”;. Online: eagri.cz/public/web/file/481729/ZZ15_V4.pdf (accessed: 8 January 2019).Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic2016Report on the State of Agriculture of the Czech Republic for 2015. “Green Report”eagri.cz/public/web/file/481729/ZZ15_V4.pdfaccessed: 8 January 2019Search in Google Scholar
Musil J., Müller J., 2008. Vnitřní periférie v České republice jako mechanismus sociální exkluze (Internal periphery in the Czech Republic as a mechanism of social exclusion). Sociologický; časopis/Czech Sociological Review 44(2): 321–348.MusilJ.MüllerJ.2008Vnitřní periférie v České republice jako mechanismus sociální exkluze (Internal periphery in the Czech Republic as a mechanism of social exclusion)Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review44232134810.13060/00380288.2008.44.2.05Search in Google Scholar
Nam C.W., Parsche R., 2001. Municipal finance in Poland, the Slovak Republic, the Czech Republic and Hungary: Institutional framework and recent development. MOST: Economic Policy in Transitional Economies 11(2): 143–164. DOI: 10.1023/A:1012218012967.NamC.W.ParscheR.2001Municipal finance in Poland, the Slovak Republic, the Czech Republic and Hungary: Institutional framework and recent developmentMOST: Economic Policy in Transitional Economies11214316410.1023/A:1012218012967Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Provazníková R., 2007. Financování měst, obcí a regionů, teorie a praxe (Financing of cities, municipalities and regions, theory and practice). GRADA Publishing, Praha.ProvazníkováR.2007Financování měst, obcí a regionů, teorie a praxe(Financing of cities, municipalities and regions, theory and practice)GRADA PublishingPrahaSearch in Google Scholar
Reingewertz Y., 2012. Do municipal amalgamations work? Evidence from municipalities in Israel. Journal of Urban Economics 72(2–3): 240–251. DOI: 10.1016/j. jue.2012.06.001.ReingewertzY.2012Do municipal amalgamations work? Evidence from municipalities in IsraelJournal of Urban Economics722–324025110.1016/j.jue.2012.06.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Reinöhlová E., 2005. Informační a komunikační technologie pro rozvoj periferních oblasti – zkušenosti ze zahraničí (Information and communication technologies for the development of peripheral areas - experience from abroad). In: Novotná M. (ed.), Problémy periferních oblastí; (Problems of peripheral areas). Praha: 36–44.ReinöhlováE.2005Informační a komunikační technologie pro rozvoj periferních oblasti – zkušenosti ze zahraničí (Information and communication technologies for the development of peripheral areas - experience from abroad)NovotnáM.Problémy periferních oblastí(Problems of peripheral areas)Praha3644Search in Google Scholar
Schnaubert J., 2016. Možnosti řešení velkého počtu malých obcí v ČR (Possibilities of solving large number of small municipalities in the Czech Republic – diploma thesis). Masaryk University, Brno.SchnaubertJ.2016Možnosti řešení velkého počtu malých obcí v ČR (Possibilities of solving large number of small municipalities in the Czech Republic – diploma thesis)Masaryk UniversityBrnoSearch in Google Scholar
Swianiewicz P. (ed.), 2002. Consolidation or fragmentation? The size of local governments in Central and Eastern Europe. Open Society Institute, Budapest.SwianiewiczP2002Consolidation or fragmentation? The size of local governments in Central and Eastern EuropeOpen Society InstituteBudapestSearch in Google Scholar
Úřad vlády ČR (Office of the Government of the Czech Republic), 2017. Strategic Framework Czech Republic 2030. Polygraphy of the Office of the Government of the Czech Republic, Prague. Online: www.cr2030.cz (accessed: 8 January 2019).Úřad vlády ČR (Office of the Government of the Czech Republic)2017Strategic Framework Czech Republic 2030. Polygraphy of the Office of the Government of the Czech Republic, Praguewww.cr2030.czaccessed: 8 January 2019Search in Google Scholar
Váchalová H., 2010. Rozvojový potenciál velmi malých obcí: Na příkladu velmi malých obcí na Domažlicku (Development potential of very small municipalities: On the example of very small municipalities in Domažlice – diploma thesis). Charles University, Praha.VáchalováH.2010Rozvojový potenciál velmi malých obcí: Na příkladu velmi malých obcí na Domažlicku (Development potential of very small municipalities: On the example of very small municipalities in Domažlice – diploma thesis)Charles UniversityPrahaSearch in Google Scholar
Vaishar A., Pavlů A., 2018. Outmigration intentions of secondary school students from a rural micro-region in the Czech inner periphery: A case study of the Bystřice nad Pernštejnem area in the Vysočina Region. Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Geographica 53(1): 49–57. DOI: 10.14712/23361980.2018.5.VaisharA.PavlůA.2018Outmigration intentions of secondary school students from a rural micro-region in the Czech inner periphery: A case study of the Bystřice nad Pernštejnem area in the Vysočina RegionActa Universitatis Carolinae. Geographica531495710.14712/23361980.2018.5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vaishar A., Zapletalová J., 2010. Sustainable development of the Moravian countryside. Revija za geografijo 5(1): 43–54.VaisharA.ZapletalováJ.2010Sustainable development of the Moravian countrysideRevija za geografijo514354Search in Google Scholar
Vajdová Z., Čermák D., Illner M., 2006. Autonomie a spolupráce: důsledky ustavení obecního zřízení v roce 1990 (Autonomy and cooperation: Consequences of the municipal establishment in 1990). Sociologický ústav AV ČR, Praha.VajdováZ.ČermákD.IllnerM.2006Autonomie a spolupráce: důsledky ustavení obecního zřízení v roce 1990(Autonomy and cooperation: Consequences of the municipal establishment in 1990)Sociologický ústav AV ČRPrahaSearch in Google Scholar
Zafra-Gómez J.L., Pérez Muñiz M.A., 2010. Overcoming cost-inefficiencies within small municipalities: Improve financial condition or reduce the quality of public services? Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 28(4): 609–629. DOI: 10.1068/c09118.Zafra-GómezJ.L.PérezMuñiz M.A.2010Overcoming cost-inefficiencies within small municipalities: Improve financial condition or reduce the quality of public services?Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space28460962910.1068/c09118Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zimmerbauer K., Paasi A., 2016. When old and new regionalism collide: Deinstitutionalization of regions and resistance identity in municipality amalgamations. Journal of Rural Studies 30: 31–40. DOI: 10.1016/j. jrurstud.2012.11.004.ZimmerbauerK.PaasiA.2016When old and new regionalism collide: Deinstitutionalization of regions and resistance identity in municipality amalgamationsJournal of Rural Studies30314010.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.11.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
