Open Access

Franziscean Cadastre in Landscape Structure Research: A Systematic Review


Cite

Fig. 1

Publication frequency and the localization of the record.
Publication frequency and the localization of the record.

Fig. 2

Terms used for retrieval of the record.
Terms used for retrieval of the record.

Fig. 3

Map and other sources dating frequency (note: figure include the FC).
Map and other sources dating frequency (note: figure include the FC).

Fig. 4

Number of time points involved in the records (note: figure include the FC).
Number of time points involved in the records (note: figure include the FC).

Fig. 5

Number of LULC classes employed in the record.
Number of LULC classes employed in the record.

Fig. 6

Part of the Franziscean cadastre involved in the study.IS – indication sketches, CE – Cadastral Elaborat, OM – original maps, WR – written registry, CII – Compulsory Imperial imprints, N/A – not available.
Part of the Franziscean cadastre involved in the study.IS – indication sketches, CE – Cadastral Elaborat, OM – original maps, WR – written registry, CII – Compulsory Imperial imprints, N/A – not available.

Fig. 7

Frequency of the supplementary data sets used. ORTO – orthophoto, MIL – Millitary mapping.
Frequency of the supplementary data sets used. ORTO – orthophoto, MIL – Millitary mapping.

Fig. 8

Association between map and data sources.MIL – Military mapping, ORTO – orthophoto/aerial imagery.
Association between map and data sources.MIL – Military mapping, ORTO – orthophoto/aerial imagery.

Frequency table of LULC classes.

LULC classFrequency
Built-up areas (yards)36
Forest39
  Coniferous forests1
  Deciduous forests1
  Coppice woods1
  Slash and Burn areas1
Agricultural land3
  Arable land30
    Arable land with trees2
    Arable land with vineyards1
    Arable land with olive trees1
Orchards14
Vineyards12
  Vineyards with trees1
  Vineyards with olive trees1
Hop fields2
Meadows and Pastures10
  Meadows18
    Meadows with trees (fruit trees)5
  Pastures13
    Pastures with trees (fruit trees)5
Water bodies (lakes, fish ponds)28
Water streams, rivers18
Gardens15
Non forest woody vegetation13
Roads, paths9
Swamps, wetlands7
Barren land6
Mining sites, Rocks4
Others11
Administrative boundaries2
LULC classes not extracted6

j.quageo-2019-0013.tab.002.w2aab3b7c13b1b6b1ab1b8ab1Aa

GroupFeatureDescriptionCategories, Values (min.–max., SD)
Bibliographic infoKeywordDatabase keyword used for search for recordFranziszeischer Kataster, Franciscian Cadastre, Stable Cadastre, Stabile Cadastre, Franciscan Cadastre, Františkánský katastr, Stabilní katastr and Austrian cadastre
TypeType of the recordArticle, Conference proceedings, Book Chapter, Review
YearYear of publishing2000–2018, 3.54
Article keywordsKeywords used in recordComma delimited text
StatePlace of case studyCzechia, Croatia, Austria, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia
Purpose and general sourceCadastral mapsIndication of cadastral maps useYES/NO
Written registryIndication of written registry useYES/NO
Purpose of the study – generalGeneral categories of the purposeLandscape – general category; Streams and water bodies; Agricultural land; Forests, Forestry; Reconstruction models; Ownership and property rights; Demography
Purpose of the study – detailedDetailed description of the purposeText description (e.g. stream and water bodies localization, land use / land cover change
Methodology and data manipulationMultitemporalityApplication of multiple time segmentsYES/NO
Number of time pointsNumber of time segments applied1–16, 2.73
Years of time pointsYears of time segments used1529–2016, 97.61
Other map sourcesCategorization of other map sourcesabbreviation of map source (e.g. 2MIL – Second military mapping, ORTO_1991–2018 – orthphoto originating from 1991–2018)
Other data sourcesCategorization of other data sourcesabbreviation of data source (e.g. URB – Urbaria, FS – Field Survey, SCH – Soil Chemistry)
Type of LULCLULC categories extracted, appliedfull name of category provided by author (i. e. Vineyards, Arable land with fruit trees)
Number of LULC classesCount of distinguished LULC classes0–12, 3.24
LULC – mapLULC classes derived solely from mapYES/NO
Georefference of map SheetIndicated GIS manipulation mentionedYES/NO
Vectorization/digitization of mapIndicated GIS manipulation mentionedYES/NO
Spatial scaleScale of the studySpatial scale of the studyadministrative scales – Cadastre, Municipality, County, Region, State; individual scales – mountain range, protected area, river, river basin
Explicit scale of the studyAcreage under study as reported by authors0.23–12,200, 2111.29 (n=32)
eISSN:
2081-6383
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Geosciences, Geography