T-Scan III System Diagnostic Tool for Digital Occlusal Analysis in Orthodontics – a Modern Approach

1. Angle EH. Classification of malocclusion. Dental Cosmos. 1899; 41: 248–264.Search in Google Scholar

2. Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod. 1972; 62(3): 296–309.10.1016/S0002-9416(72)90268-0Search in Google Scholar

3. Andrews LF, Andrews WA. The six elements of orofacial harmony. Andrews J. 2000; 1: 13–22.Search in Google Scholar

4. Qadeer S, et al. Relationship between articulation pa per mark size and percentage of force measured with computerized occlusal analysis. J Adv Prosthodont. 2012; 4(1): 7–12.10.4047/jap.2012.4.1.7Search in Google Scholar

5. Dr. Jin-Hwan Kim, DDS Article 1. Computerized Occlusal Analysis Utilizing the T-Scan III System.Search in Google Scholar

6. Julia Cohen-Lévy, Nicolas Cohen. Computerized occlusal analysis in dentofacial orthopedics: indications and clinical use of the T-scan III system. Journal of Dentofacial Anomalies and Orthodontics. Vol. 15, Issue 02, January 2012.10.1051/odfen/2012103Search in Google Scholar

7. Baldini, A. Beraldi, A. Nanussi. Importanza clinica della valutazione computerizzata dell'occlusione. DEN TAL CADMOS. 2009, April; 77(4).Search in Google Scholar

8. An W, Wang B, Bai Y. Occlusal contacts during pro trusion and lateral movements after orthodontic treat ment. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Za Zhi. 2011 Dec; 29(6): 614–7.Search in Google Scholar

9. He Shu-zhen, Li Song, Gao Xiao-hui, An Wei-wei. A preliminary study on the occlusal contact changes du ring retention in adolescent patients. Chinese Journal of Stomatology. 2010; 45(9): 556–9.Search in Google Scholar

10. Koos B, Höller J, Schille C, Godt A. Time-depen dent analysis and representation of force distribution and occlusion contact in the masticatory cycle. J Orofac Orthop. 2012 May; 73(3): 204–14.10.1007/s00056-012-0075-2Search in Google Scholar

11. Koos B, Godt A, Schille C, Goz G. Precision of an instrumentation-based method of analyzing occlusion and its resulting distribution of forces in the dental arch. J Orofac Orthop. 2010 Nov; 71(6): 403–10.10.1007/s00056-010-1023-7Search in Google Scholar

12. Kerstein RB, Radke J. Masseter and temporalis excur sive hyperactivity decreased by measured anterior guidance development. The Journal of Craniomandibular Practice, Publisher: Chroma, Inc. Audience: Acade mic Format: Magazine/Journal. 2012 Oct; 30(4): 243–54.10.1179/crn.2012.038Search in Google Scholar

13. Wang C, Yin X. Occlusal risk factors associated with temporomandibular disorders in young adults with normal occlusions. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Patho. Radiol. 2012 Oct; 114(4): 419–23.10.1016/j.oooo.2011.10.039Search in Google Scholar

14. Ciancaglini R, Gherlone E.F., Radaelli G. Association between loss of occlusal support and symptoms of functional disturbances of the masticatory system. J Oral Rehabil. 1999; 26(3): 248–53.10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00368.xSearch in Google Scholar

15. Conti P.C, et al. A cross-sectional study of preva lence and etiology of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in high school and university students. J Orofac Pain.1996; 10(3): 254–62.Search in Google Scholar

16. Marklund S, Wanman A. Risk factors associated with incidence and persistence of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders. Acta Odontol Scand. 2010 Sep; 68(5): 289–99.10.3109/00016357.2010.494621Search in Google Scholar

17. Kahn J, Tallents RH, Katzberg RW, Ross ME, Murphy WC. Prevalence of dental occlusal variables and intra-articular temporomandibular disorders: molar relationship, lateral guidance, and nonworking side con tacts. J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Oct; 82(4): 410–5.10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70027-2Search in Google Scholar

18. Akoren AC, Karaagaclioglu L. Comparison of the electromyographic activity of individuals with canine guidance and group function occlusion. J Oral Rehabil. 1995; 22(1): 73–7.10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb00213.x7897562Search in Google Scholar