Numerical Investigation of the Hydrodynamic Performance of the Propeller Behind the Ship with and Without Wed

1. “The Becker Mewis Duct.” [Online]. Available: http://www.baltmarine.eu/becker-marine-systemsSearch in Google Scholar

2. H. Schneekluth, “Wake equalising ducts,” The Naval Architect, 1986.Search in Google Scholar

3. J. Friesch and C. Johannsen, “Propulsion optimization tests at high Reynolds numbers,” in SNAME Trans, 1994, pp. 1–21.Search in Google Scholar

4. E. Korkut, “A –case study for the effect of a –flow improvement device (a –partial wake equalizing duct) on ship powering characteristics,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 205–218, Feb. 2006.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2005.03.010Search in Google Scholar

5. F. Çelik, “A –numerical study for effectiveness of a –wake equalizing duct,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 34, no. 16, pp. 2138–2145, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

6. J. S. Go, H. S. Yoon, and J. H. Jung, “Effects of a –duct before a –propeller on propulsion performance,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 136, pp. 54–66, May 2017.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.03.012Search in Google Scholar

7. F. Mewis and H. Peters, “Power savings through a –novel fin system,” in SMSSH Conference, 1986, p. 9.Search in Google Scholar

8. F. Mewis, “Development of a –novel power-saving device for full-form vessels,” HANSA International Maritime Journal, vol. 11, no. 145, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

9. F. Mewis, “A –novel power-saving device for full-form vessels,” in First International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, June 2009.Search in Google Scholar

10. J. Dang, H. Chen, G. Dong, A. Ploeg, R. Hallmann, and F. Mauro, “An exploratory study on the working principles of energy saving devices (ESDs) – PIV, CFD investigations and ESD design guidelines,” in 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering OMAE2012, 2012.10.1115/OMAE2012-83053Search in Google Scholar

11. J. Dang, H. Chen, D. Guoxiang, A. Van Der Ploeg, R. Hallmann, and F. Mauro, “An exploratory study on the working principles of energy saving devices (ESDs),” Symposium on Green Ship Technology (Greenship’2011), October, 2011.10.1115/OMAE2012-83053Search in Google Scholar

12. H. J. Shin, J. S. Lee, K. H. Lee, M. R. Han, E. B. Hur, and S. C. Shin, “Numerical and experimental investigation of conventional and un-conventional preswirl duct for VLCC,” International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 414–430, 2013.10.3744/JNAOE.2013.5.3.414Search in Google Scholar

13. J. H. Kim, J. E. Choi, B. J. Choi, S. H. Chung, and H. W. Seo, “Development of energy-saving devices for a –full slow-speed ship through improving propulsion performance,” International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 390–398, 2015.10.1515/ijnaoe-2015-0027Search in Google Scholar

14. A. Hanaoka, Y. Kawanami, and M. Hinatsu, “Application of quasi-continuous method to open-water characteristics predictions of propellers with energy-saving ducts,” International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, vol. 26, pp. 72–80, 2016.10.17736/ijope.2016.sh11Search in Google Scholar

15. H. Nowruzi and A. Najafi, “An experimental and CFD study on the effects of different pre-swirl ducts on propulsion performance of series 60 ship,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 173, no. 424, pp. 491–509, 2019.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.01.007Search in Google Scholar

16. A. R. Nadery and H. Ghassemi, “Hydrodynamic performance of the ship propeller under oscillating flow with and without stator,” American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 56-61. 2020.Search in Google Scholar

17. A. R. Nadery and H. Ghassemi, “Toward the hydrodynamic performance of the propeller behind the ship by pre-swirl stator”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, revised under review.Search in Google Scholar

18. CD-Adapco, “User Guide STAR-CCM+.” 2014.Search in Google Scholar

19. J. Felicjancik, P. Król, and B. Tomasz, “Experimental and computational analysis of the ship propeller in open water conditions for inclined flow,” Nutts’16 19th Numerical Towing Tank Symposium, pp. 26–31, 2016.10.1515/pomr-2016-0067Search in Google Scholar

20. P. M. Carrica, H. Fu, and F. Stern, “Computations of self-propulsion free to sink and trim and of motions in head waves of the KRISO Container Ship (KCS) model,” Applied Ocean Research, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 309–320, 2011.10.1016/j.apor.2011.07.003Search in Google Scholar

21. Y. Huilan, Z. Huaixin, and Y. Chao, “Comparison of three automatic unstructured mesh types in the simulations of a propeller from global forces to flow field details,” Shanghai, China, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

22. I. B. Celik, U. Ghia, P. J. Roache, C. J. Freitas, H. Coleman, and P. E. Raad, “Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications,” Journal of Fluids Engineering, vol. 130, no. 7, pp. 078001–078004, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

23. ITTC Procedings, “Practical Guidelines for Ship CFD Applications ITTC – Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, section 7.5-03-02-03,” in International Towing Tank Conference, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

24. C. Wang, S. Sun, L. Li, and L. Ye, “Numerical prediction analysis of propeller bearing force for full-scale hull-propeller-rudder system,” International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 589–601, 2016.10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2016.06.003Search in Google Scholar