[
1. Bugalski T., Streckwall H., Szantyr J. A. (2013): Critical review of propeller performance scaling methods, based on model experiments and numerical calculations. Polish Maritime Research, 4(80), Vol. 20, 71–80.10.2478/pomr-2013-0043
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Brockett T. (1981): Lifting-Surface Hydrodynamics for Design of Rotating Blades, Propellers ‘81 Symposium.10.5962/bhl.title.47399
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Gaggero S., Gonzalez-Adalid J., Perez Sobrino M. (2016): Design of contracted and tip loaded propellers by using boundary element methods and optimization algorithms. Applied Ocean Research, Vol. 55, 102–129.10.1016/j.apor.2015.12.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Greeley D. S., Kerwin J. E. (1982): Numerical methods for propeller design and analysis in steady flow. SNAME Transactions, Vol. 90, 415–453.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Jarzyna H., Koronowicz T., Szantyr J. A. (1996): Design of marine propellers, Selected problems. Ossolineum, Wrocław.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Kobyliński L. (1955): Śruby okrętowe (in Polish). Wydawnictwo Komunikacyjne, Warszawa.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Koyama K. (1993): Comparative calculations of propellers by surface panel method, Workshop organized by 20th ITTC Propulsor Committee. Papers of Ship Research Institute.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Król P., Bugalski T. (2018): Application of vortex flow model in propeller – stator system design and analysis. Polish Maritime Research, 1(97), Vol. 25, 35–44.10.2478/pomr-2018-0004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Król P., Tesch K. (2018): Experimental and numerical validation of the improved vortex method applied to CP745 marine propeller model. Polish Maritime Research, 2(98), Vol. 25, 57–66.10.2478/pomr-2018-0054
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Lee K. J., Hoshino T., Lee J. H. (2014): A lifting surface optimization method for the design of marine propeller blades. Ocean Engineering, Vol. 88, 472–470.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.07.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Lee T., Park S. O. (2009): Improved iteration algorithm for nonlinear vortex lattice method. Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 46, No. 6.10.2514/1.44829
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Luca G., Roberto M., Claudio T. (2014): Marine propellers performance and flow-field prediction by a free-wake panel method. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Vol. 26 (5), 780–795.10.1016/S1001-6058(14)60087-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Miclea-Bleiziffer M., Untaroiu A., Delgado A. (2014): Development of a novel design method for marine propellers by computing the exact lift of arbitrary hydrofoils in cascade. Ocean Engineering, Vol. 83, 87–98.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.03.015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Morgan B., Silovic V., Denny S. B. (1968): Propeller Lifting-Surface Corrections. SNAME Transactions, Vol. 76, 309–347.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Muscari R., Mascio A., Verzicco R. (2013): Modeling of vortex dynamics in the wake of a marine propeller. Computers & Fluids, Vol. 73, 65–79.10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.12.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Noosomton J., Gunnuang W. (2017): Case study on CFD simulation and experiment of new developed propeller for training Thai boat. Fifth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors – SMP’17, Espoo.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Suchecki W. (2018): Studies on velocity fields around the cavitation vortices generated by the model of a rotating blade. Polish Maritime Research, 2(98), Vol. 25, 66–70.10.2478/pomr-2018-0055
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Szantyr J. (1984): Deformable lifting surface method for determination of unsteady cavitation on screw propeller blade and its hydrodynamic results (in Polish). IMP PAN Gdańsk.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Zeraatgar H., Hossein Ghaemi M. (2019): The analysis of overall ship fuel consumption in acceleration manoeuvre using hull-propeller-engine interaction principles and governor features. Polish Maritime Research, 1(101), Vol. 26, 162–173.10.2478/pomr-2019-0018
]Search in Google Scholar
