[
1. IMO Res MSC (2002): Standards for Ship Manoeuvrability, 137 (76).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. IMO MSC/Circ.1053 (2002): Explanatory Notes to the Standards for Ship Manoeuvrability.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. ITTC, Manoeuvring Committee (2008): Final Report and Recommendations to the 25th ITTC. Proceedings of 25th International Towing Tank Conference, Fukuoka, Japan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Mofidi A., Carrica P.M. (2014): Simulations of Zigzag Maneuvers for a Container Ship with Direct Moving Rudder and Propeller. Comput. Fluids, 96, 191–203.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Shen Z., Wan D., Carrica P.M. (2015): Dynamic Overset Grids in OpenFOAM with Application to KCS Self-Propulsion and Maneuvering. Ocean. Eng., 108, 287–306.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Wang J., Zou L., Wan D. (2018): Numerical Simulations of Zigzag Maneuver of Free Running Ship in Waves by RANSOverset Grid Method. Ocean. Eng., 162, 55–79.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Abkowitz, M.A. (1964): Lectures on Ship Hydrodynamics-Steering and Manoeuvrability. In: Hydro- and Aerodynamics Lab, Report No. Hy-5, Lyngby, Copenhagen, Denmark.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Yasukawa H., Yoshimura, Y. (2015): Introduction of MMG Standard Method for Ship Maneuvering Predictions. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 20(1), 37–52.10.1007/s00773-014-0293-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Sakamoto N., Carrica P.M., Stern F. (2012): URANS Simulations of Static and Dynamic Maneuvering for Surface Combatant: Part 1. Verification and Validation for Forces, Moment, and Hydrodynamic Derivatives. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 17(4), 422–445.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Hai-peng G., Zao-jian Z. (2017): System-Based Investigation on 4-DOF Ship Maneuvering with Hydrodynamic Derivatives Determined by RANS Simulation of Captive Model Tests. Applied Ocean Research, 68, 11-25.10.1016/j.apor.2017.08.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Yi L., Lu Z., Zaojian Z., Haipeng G. (2018): Predictions of Ship Maneuverability Based on Virtual Captive Model Tests. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 12(1), 334–353.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Kim H., Akimoto H., Islam H. (2015): Estimation of the Hydrodynamic Derivatives by RANS Simulation of Planar Motion Mechanism Test. Ocean Engineering, 108, 129–139.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.08.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Islam H., Guedes Soares C. (2018): Estimation of Hydrodynamic Derivatives of a Container Ship Using PMM Simulation in OpenFOAM. Ocean Engineering, 108, 164–425.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.06.063
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Ueno M., Yoshimura Y., Tsukada Y., Miyazaki H. (2009): Circular Motion Tests and Uncertainty Analysis for Ship Maneuverability. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 14, 469–484.10.1007/s00773-009-0065-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Yoshimura Y., Ueno M., Tsukada Y. (2008): Analysis of Steady Hydrodynamic Force Components and Prediction of Manoeuvring Ship Motion with KVLCC1, KVLCC2 and KCS. SIMMAN 2008, Workshop on verification and validation of ship manoeuvring simulation method, Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 1, Copenhagen, pp. E80–E86.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. SIMMAN (2008): Part C Captive and Free Model Test Data. Workshop on verification and validation of ship manoeuvring simulation method, Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 1, Copenhagen.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Stern F., Wilson R.V., Coleman H.W., Paterson E.G. (2001): Comprehensive Approach to Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations Part 1: Methodology and Procedures. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 123(4), 793–802.10.1115/1.1412235
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Wilson R., Shao J., Stern F. (2004): Discussion: Criticisms of the “Correction Factor” Verification Method. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 126(4), 704–706.10.1115/1.1780171
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. SIMMAN (2014). Retrieved from http://simman2014.dk/ship-data/moeri-kvlcc2-tanker/geometry-and-conditions-moeri-kvlcc2-tanker/.
]Search in Google Scholar
