Power Performance of the Combined Monopile Wind Turbine and Floating Buoy with Heave-type Wave Energy Converter

1. Pérez-Collazo, C., D. Greaves, and G. Iglesias, A review of combined wave and offshore wind energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015. 42: pp. 141-153.10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.032Search in Google Scholar

2. Antonio, F.d.O., Wave energy utilization: A review of the technologies. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2010. 14(3): pp. 899-918.10.1016/j.rser.2009.11.003Search in Google Scholar

3. Aubault, A., et al. Modeling of an oscillating water column on the floating foundation WindFloat. in : ASME 2011 30^th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. 2011. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.10.1115/OMAE2011-49014Search in Google Scholar

4. Luan, C., et al. Modeling and analysis of a 5 MW semi-submersible wind turbine combined with three flap-type Wave Energy Converters. in : ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. 2014. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.10.1115/OMAE2014-24215Search in Google Scholar

5. Michailides, C., et al. Effect of flap type wave energy converters on the response of a semi-submersible wind turbine in operational conditions. in : ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. 2014. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.10.1115/OMAE2014-24065Search in Google Scholar

6. Peiffer, A., D. Roddier, and A. Aubault. Design of a point absorber inside the WindFloat structure. in : ASME 2011 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. 2011. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.10.1115/OMAE2011-49015Search in Google Scholar

7. Bachynski, E.E. and T. Moan. Point absorber design for a combined wind and wave energy converter on a tension-leg support structure. in : ASME 2013 32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. 2013. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.10.1115/OMAE2013-10429Search in Google Scholar

8. Muliawan, M.J., et al., Extreme responses of a combined spar-type floating wind turbine and floating wave energy converter (STC) system with survival modes. Ocean Engineering, 2013. 65: pp. 71-82.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.03.002Search in Google Scholar

9. Muliawan, M.J., M. Karimirad, and T. Moan, Dynamic response and power performance of a combined spar-type floating wind turbine and coaxial floating wave energy converter. Renewable Energy, 2013. 50: pp. 47-57.10.1016/j.renene.2012.05.025Search in Google Scholar

10. Muliawan, M.J., et al. STC (Spar-Torus Combination): a combined spar-type floating wind turbine and large point absorber floating wave energy converter—promising and challenging. in : ASME 2012 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. 2012. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.10.1115/OMAE2012-84272Search in Google Scholar

11. Wan, L., Z. Gao, and T. Moan, Experimental and numerical study of hydrodynamic responses of a combined wind and wave energy converter concept in survival modes. Coastal Engineering, 2015. 104: pp. 151-169.10.1016/j.coastaleng.2015.07.001Search in Google Scholar

12. Wan, L., Z. Gao, and T. Moan. Model test of the STC concept in survival modes. in : ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. 2014. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.10.1115/OMAE2014-23213Search in Google Scholar

13. Wan, L., et al., Experimental and numerical comparisons of hydrodynamic responses for a combined wind and wave energy converter concept under operational conditions. Renewable Energy, 2016. 93: pp. 87-100.10.1016/j.renene.2016.01.087Search in Google Scholar

14. Wan, L., et al., Comparative experimental study of the survivability of a combined wind and wave energy converter in two testing facilities. Ocean Engineering, 2016. 111: pp. 82-94.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.10.045Search in Google Scholar

15. Ren, N., et al. Dynamic Response of a Combined Mono-Pile Wind Turbine and Heave-Type Wave Energy Converter System. In : ASME 2017 36th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. 2017. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.10.1115/OMAE2017-62292Search in Google Scholar

16. Ren, N., et al., Experimental and numerical study of hydrodynamic responses of a new combined monopile wind turbine and a heave-type wave energy converter under typical operational conditions. Ocean Engineering, 2018. 159: pp. 1-8.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.03.090Search in Google Scholar

17. Jonkman, J.M., Definition of the Floating System for Phase IV of OC3. 2010: Citeseer.10.2172/979456Search in Google Scholar

18. Rourke, F.O., F. Boyle, and A. Reynolds, Renewable energy resources and technologies applicable to Ireland. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009. 13(8): pp. 1975-1984.10.1016/j.rser.2009.01.014Search in Google Scholar