[1. D. Durante, G. Dubbioso, C. Testa: Simplified hydrodynamic models for the analysis of marine propellers in a wakefield, Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 954–965, 2013.10.1016/S1001-6058(13)60445-X]Search in Google Scholar
[2. J. H. Ferziger, M. Perić: Computational methods for fluid dynamics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002.10.1007/978-3-642-56026-2]Search in Google Scholar
[3. S. Gaggero, J. Gonzalez-Adalid, M. Perez Sobrino: Design of contracted and tip loaded propellers by using boundary element methods and optimization algorithms, Applied Ocean Research, Vol. 55, pp. 102–129, 2016.10.1016/j.apor.2015.12.004]Search in Google Scholar
[4. D. S. Greeley, J. E. Kerwin: Numerical methods for propeller design and analysis in steady flow, SNAME Transactions, Vol. 90, pp. 415–453, 1982.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. ITTC – Recommend procedures and guidelines: model manufacture, propeller models, propeller model accuracy, Propulsion Committee of 24th ITTC 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. ITTC – Recommend procedures and guidelines: testing and extrapolation methods, propulsion, propulsor open water test, Propulsion Committee of 24th ITTC 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. H. Jarzyna, T. Koronowicz, J. Szantyr: Design of marine propellers, Selected problems, Ossolineum, Wroclaw 1996.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. L. Kobyliński: Marine propellers, Wyd. Komunikacyjne, Warszawa 1955 (in Polish).]Search in Google Scholar
[9. K. Koyama: Comparative calculations of propellers by surface panel method, Workshop organized by 20th ITTC Propulsor Committee, Papers of Ship Research Institute, 1993.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. P. Król, T. Bugalski, M. Wawrzusiszyn: Development of numerical methods for marine propeller – pre-swirl stator system design and analysis, SMP2017, Espoo, 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. K.-J. Lee, T. Hoshino, J.-H. Lee: A lifting surface optimization method for the design of marine propeller blades, Ocean Engineering, Vol. 88, pp. 472–470, 2014.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.07.010]Search in Google Scholar
[12. T. Lee, S. O. Park: Improved iteration algorithm for nonlinear vortex lattice method, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 46, No. 6., 2009.10.2514/1.44829]Search in Google Scholar
[13. G. Luca, M. Roberto, T. Claudio: Marine propellers performance and flow-field prediction by a free-wake panel method, Journal of Hydrodynamics, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 780–795, 2014.10.1016/S1001-6058(14)60087-1]Search in Google Scholar
[14. F. R. Menter: Two-equations eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications, AIAA-Journal, Vol. 32, No. 8, 1994.10.2514/3.12149]Search in Google Scholar
[15. R. Muscari, A. Mascio, R. Verzicco: Modeling of vortex dynamics in the wake of a marine propeller, Computers & Fluids, Vol. 73, pp. 65–79, 2013.10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.12.003]Search in Google Scholar
[16. J. Noosomton, W. Gunnuang: Case study on CFD simulation and experiment of new developed propeller for training thai boat, SMP2017, Espoo, 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. OpenFOAM user guide, OpenFOAM Foundation Ltd., 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. OpenFOAM programmer’s guide, OpenFOAM Foundation Ltd., 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Y. Wang, M. Abdel-Maksound, P. Wang, B. Song: Simulate the PPTC propeller with a vortex particle-boundary element hybrid method, SMP2017, Espoo, 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. D.C. Wilcox: Turbulence modeling for CFD, DCW Industries, 1994.]Search in Google Scholar