[
Altbach, P., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. (2010). Tracking a global academic revolution. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(2), 30–39.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Andrew, N., Tolson, D., & Ferguson, D. (2008). Building on Wenger: communities of practice in nursing. School of Health Paper 105. Glasgow Caledonian University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bayne, S., & Ross, J. (2016). Manifesto redux: making a teaching philosophy from networked learning research. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Networked Learning 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bilgin, A.A., Rowe, A.D., & Clark, L. (2017). Academic workload implications of assessing student learning in work-integrated learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, Special Issue, 18(2), 167–183.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borge, M., & Goggins, S. (2014). Towards the facilitation of an online community of learners: assessing the quality of interactions in Yammer. Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS, 2, 753–760.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
British Educational Research Association (BERA) (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research. London: British Educational Research Association.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brodie, P., & Irving, K. (2007). Assessment in work-based learning: investigating a pedagogical approach to enhance student learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(1), 11–19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cansoy, R. (2017). Teachers’ Professional Development: The Case of WhatsApp. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(4), 285–293.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DeWert, M., Babinski, L., & Jones, B. (2003). Safe passages providing online support to beginning teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 311–320.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dunbar, R. (2015). Do online social media cut through the constraints that limit the size of offline social networks? Royal Society Open Science, 3(150292).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Egan, A. (2018). Pre-service teachers and their experiences of technology: A mixed methods Study. Doctoral thesis. Trinity College, Dublin, The University of Dublin.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eid, M., & Al-Jabri, I., (2016). Social networking, knowledge sharing, and student learning: The case of university students. Computers & Education, 99, 14–27.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferguson, C., DiGiacomo, M., Saliba, B., Green, J., Moorley, C., Wyllie A., & Jackson, D. (2016). First year nursing students’ experiences of social media during the transition to university: a focus group study. Contemporary Nurse, 52(5), 625–635.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frey, B.B. (Ed.). (2018). The SAGE encyclopaedia of educational research, measurement and evaluation. [online] London: Sage Publications Ltd. Available from: http://methods-sagepub-com.ezproxy.northampton.ac.uk/Reference/the-sage-encyclopedia-of-educational-research-measurement-and-evaluation/i10168.xml
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garcia, E., Elbeltagi, I., Dungay, K., & Hardaker, G. (2015). Student use of Facebook for informal learning and peer support. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 32(5), 286–299.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garrison, D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2003). A theory of critical inquiry into online distance learning. In M. Moore & W.G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education, (pp. 113–128). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Godrich, H. (2017). Students’ design project series: Sharing experiences. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 82–88.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gray, C. (2015). Designing online education for work-based learners: Refining bite sized learning. Doctoral Thesis, Abertay University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2016). Social media and education: reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 6–30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hamilton, R. (2017). Work-based Learning Routes in Social Work Education: An Exploration of Student Experiences. PhD thesis. The Open University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haythornthwaite, C. (2001). Exploring multiplexity: Social network structures in a computer supported distance learning class. The Information Society, 17, 211–226.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haythornthwaite, C. (2019). Learning, connectivity and networks. Information and Learning Sciences, 120(1/2), 19–38. [Online]. Available from: DOI 10.1108/ILS-06-2018-0052.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haythornthwaite, C., Kazmer, M., Robins, J., & Shoemaker, S. (2000). Community development among distance learners: Temporal and technological dimensions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoffman, E.A. (2006). ‘The importance of place: Using local-focus videos to spark the sociological imagination. Teaching Sociology, 34, 164–172.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
House, J.S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.02.007 (accessed: November 21, 2019).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Irwin, C., Ball, L., Desbrow, B., & Leveritt, M. (2012), Students’ perceptions of using Facebook as an interactive learning resource at university. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1221–1232.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jones, C., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation students: agency and choice and new technologies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 344–356.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Junco, R. (2015). Student class standing, Facebook use, and academic performance. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 36, 18–29.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kearns, L.R., & Frey, B.A. (2010). Web 2.0 Technologies and Back Channel Communication in an Online Learning Community. Techtrends, 54, 41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kelly, N., & Antonio, A. (2016). Teacher peer support in social network sites. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 138–149.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kelly, N. (2019). Online networks in teacher education. In T. Allen (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopaedia of education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kupferberg, F. (2004). Professional communities and the life history method: A critique of the Lave-Wenger paradigm of learning. A Paper presented at the ESREA-Conference in Roskilde, March 4–7, 2004.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewis, K.O., McVay-Dyche, J., Chen, H., & Seto, T.L. (2015). Examining Sense of Community among Medical Professionals in an Online Graduate Program. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 1–29.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Macià, M., & García, I. (2016). Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher professional development: A review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 291–307.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: ‘it is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work’. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 141–155.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mann, S. (2016). The research interview. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Masika, R., & Jones, J. (2015) Building student belonging and engagement: insights into higher education students’ experiences of participating and learning together. Teaching in Higher Education: Critical Perspectives, 21(2), 138–150.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mercieca, B., & Kelly, N. (2018). Early career teacher peer support through private groups in social media. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 46(1), 61–77.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morley, D. (Ed.). (2018). Enhancing employability in Higher Education through work-based learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morosanu, L., Handley, K., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Seeking support: researching first-year students’ experiences of coping with academic life. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(6), 665–678.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Munoz, C., & Towner, T. (2011). Back to the ‘wall’: Facebook in the college classroom. Firstmonday.org
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Keeffe, M. (2016). Exploring higher education professionals’ use of Twitter for learning. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(1), 1–16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Leary, Z. (2017). The essential guide to doing your research project (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Owen, C. (2017). Surveys. In J. Swain (Ed.), Designing research in education, (pp. 123–147). London: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital immigrants, digital natives. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prescott, J., Wilson, S., & Becket, G. (2013). Facebook use in the learning environment: Do students want this? Learning, Media and Technology, 38(3), 345–350.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Purvis, A., Rodger, H., & Beckingham, S. (2016). Engagement or distraction: The use of social media for learning in higher education. Student Engagement and Experience Journal, 5(1). [Online] ISSN 2047-9476.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shackelford, J., & Maxwell, M. (2012). Sense of community in graduate online education: Contribution of learner to learner interaction. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 228–249.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stepich, D., & Ertmer, P. (2003). Building community as a critical element of online course design. Educational Technology, 43(5), 33–43.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stone, S., & Logan, A. (2018). Exploring students’ use of the social networking site WhatsApp to foster connectedness in the online learning experience. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(1), 42–55.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown up digital: how the Net Generation is changing your world. New York: McGraw-Hill.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thomas, E. (2012). Building student engagement and belonging in Higher Education at a time of change: final report from the What Works? Student Retention & Success programme. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tschofen, C., & Mackness, J. (2012). Connectivism and dimensions of individual experience. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 124–143.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turner, V. (1969). Liminality and communitas, in the ritual process: structure and anti-structure. Chicago: Aldine.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: mobilities for the twenty-first Century. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Uusiautti, S., & Määttä, K. (2014). I am no longer alone – How do university students perceive the possibilities of social media? International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 19(3), 293–305.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walliman, N. (2005). Your research project: a step by step guide for the first time researcher (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walliman, N. (2018). Research methods: the basics (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wenger, E., White, N., & Smith, J.D. (2009). Digital habitats: Stewarding technology for communities. Portland, OR: CPsquare.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilcox, P., Winn, S., & Fyvie-Gauld, M. (2005). ’It was nothing to do with the university, it was just the people’: the role of social support in the first-year experience of higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 30(6), 707–722.
]Search in Google Scholar
, 