Open Access

Alveolar proteinosis – disease with unpredictable evolution (series of clinical cases)


Cite

Definition

Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) is a rare disease, first described in 1958, characterised by the intra-alveolar accumulation of a milky fluid rich in phospholipids and lipoproteins derived from alveolar surfactant, positive in periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining (1,2).

Epidemiology

The real prevalence of the disease is not known, but data reported by different authors are around 0.2–6 cases per 1,000,000 (3,4). The median age is 30–50 years, being more frequent in men (2:1 ratio) and in smokers. Genetic cause is also present in pediatric cases.

Pathogenesis

The alveolar macrophages (AMs) play a major role in the pathogenesis of PAP, and its role in the turn-over of alveolar surfactant is being altered by various mechanisms (5).

Ninety percent of PAP cases are primary autoimmune, characterised by the presence in serum of circulating autoantibodies against granulocyte-macrophages colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) preventing the surfactant resorption by AM, with excessive accumulation in alveoli (6,7,8,9). The remaining 10% of PAP cases are either secondary to other diseases (lung infections, hematologic malignancies and AIDS) (10,11,12) or inhalation of silica, aluminium, titanium oxide or insecticides (13,14).

Hereditary PAP occurs in neonates and children and is caused by mutations in genes encoding for the α or β chains of the GM-CSF receptor (15,16,17).

Positive diagnosis

The symptoms of PAP are non-specific and slow: dry or mild-productive cough, dyspnoea on exertion, asthenia, malaise, low-grade fever and weight loss. Physical examination may be normal or shows end-inspiratory crackles, finger clubbing and cyanosis. One-third of the patients with PAP have no symptoms (18,19).

Chest X-ray shows bilateral symmetric mixed alveolar-interstitial opacities, with predominance of perihilar and lower lobes, difficult to differentiate from other conditions like bronchopneumonia, pulmonary oedema, and so on (20).

High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the chest shows a highly suggestive pattern for a positive diagnosis, described as “crazy-paving” – a mixture of patchy areas of ground-glass opacities with smooth interlobular septal thickening and intralobular interstitial thickening, which produces a polygonal pattern, together with areas with normal morphology. Clinicians should be aware that these aspects may be also seen in other conditions like lesional or cardiogenic pulmonary oedema, pulmonary infection (mycoplasma and pneumocystis), alveolar haemorrhage, exogenous lipoid pneumonia, mucinous bronchoalveolar cell carcinoma, and other (21,22,23,24).

The discrepancy between few and slow-progressing symptoms and impressive radiological presence is one of the keys to a positive diagnosis.

Bronchoalveolar lavage is pathognomonic, showing a milky-like fluid with increased cellularity, a high proportion of lymphocytes, large foamy macrophages with eosinophilic granules and extracellular PAS-positive globular hyaline material (25,26).

Lung biopsy (either transbronchial or through video-assisted thoracoscopy) is rarely necessary; it shows intra-alveolar granular PAS-positive and diastase-resistant eosinophilic material. Electron microscopy of the material shows multilamellated structures and membranous vesicles (27).

Other tests

Anti-GM-CSF antibodies >19 μg/mL are specific to auto-immune PAP; levels <10 mg/mL have a good negative predictive value (28,29). These autoantibodies may be detected at low concentrations in healthy subjects or in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (30,31). Serum LDH is elevated in half of the cases. KL-6 (Krebs von den Lungen 6), a mucin-like glycoprotein, correlates well with the disease severity, and high levels predict severe evolution and need for repeated whole lung lavage (WLL) (32).

Pulmonary function tests are important for therapeutical decision and disease monitoring. The most frequent pattern is the restrictive one (although smokers can show an obstructive or mixed ventilatory dysfunction), with low diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) (20).

In more advanced cases, blood-gas analysis shows arterial hypoxaemia with increased alveolar-arterial gradient. 6-min walking test (6MWT) shows desaturation on effort and is useful in the follow-up of patients.

Evolution and prognosis

The evolution of each case is unpredictable at the moment of diagnosis (1).

About 15–20% of cases regress spontaneously without any treatment, others have stable disease (≈50%) and the rest have multiple relapses and progressive disease. Nevertheless, since the wide use of WLL, 5-year survival with auto-immune PAP is almost 95%. A minority of cases progress to interstitial fibrosis and chronic respiratory failure (3,4).

The natural history of secondary PAP depends on the underlying aetiologic condition. For example, the probability of survival at 2 years has been reported to be less than 50% in cases with secondary PAP complicating haematological disorders (11,12).

Patients with PAP secondary to inhalation of inorganic dust or insecticides should avoid further exposure.

As the AM function is altered in PAP, these patients have a risk of opportunistic infections, mainly with Aspergillus, mycobacteria and Nocardia (33).

Treatment

Mild cases of PAP need only follow-up with conservative measures (1).

More severe cases, with important dyspnoea on exertion, desaturation at 6MWT, PaO2 at rest <65 mmHg and increased alveolar-arterial gradient >40 mmHg should receive WLL, which is considered gold standard in the therapy of PAP. It is performed under general anaesthesia, with separation of lungs (double-lumen endotracheal tube): one lung is ventilated and the other lung is washed with high amounts of a warm saline solution (15–25 L) until the fluid that comes out turns from milky to limpid. The treatment is done consecutively bilateral, 1–2 weeks apart (34,35,36).

In most cases, patients show symptomatic, radiographic and functional improvement after WLL, but relapses may occur, which may require repeated lavage. Patients should have regular follow-up with a pulmonologist.

In PAP secondary to other diseases WLL, although feasible, usually provides only transient benefit.

In refractory cases to repeated WLL or in those too severe to undergo this procedure, there are other treatment options with low degree of recommendation due to small number of cases and lack of randomised controlled trials: administration of recombinant GM-CSF (sargramostim and molgramostim) either through inhaled route or subcutaneous injections, aiming to stimulate the AM to eliminate the excessive surfactant (37,38,39,40,41,42,43); plasmapheresis and/or rituximab addressing the circulating auto-antibodies or lowering the production of these by CD20 lymphocytes (44,45,46,47).

Clinical cases with different patterns of evolution
Case 1

A 35-year-old male was admitted for fever, sweats, malaise and frequent cough with purulent sputum, starting 5 days ago. He was an active smoker of 13 pack-year. No previous dyspnoea on exertion was noted. Antibiotic treatment with oral cefuroxime was started 2 days before, with only a slight improvement of symptoms.

Physical examination was quite common, except the anterior part of the right hemithorax; end-inspiratory crackles could be heard. Saturation in oxygen in room air was in the normal range.

Chest X-ray showed bilateral perihilar opacities with predominance of lower lobes, more expressed on the right side (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Case 1: Chest X-ray at admission to hospital.

Laboratory investigations from blood revealed leukocytosis (19.300/mm3) with neutrophilia (86.2%), elevated ESR and C reactive protein, negative HIV test, normal liver and kidney parameters.

Sputum examination was negative for acid-fast bacilli, Gram stain showed neutrophils, macrophages, Gram-positive cocci and Gram-negative coccobacilli; the aerobic cultures were negative.

CT scan showed alveolar consolidation in medium lobe with air bronchogram, together with “crazy-paving” areas alternating with normal ones (Figure 2A,B).

Figures 2

(A and B) Case 1: CT scan at admission to hospital.

Bronchoalveolar lavage from lingula showed rare PAS-positive intra- and extra-cellular corpuscles.

Pulmonary function tests were in a normal range except DLco (51.5% from predicted), with Kco 74.9%.

The diagnosis was “Middle lobe community-acquired pneumonia; a mild form of alveolar proteinosis”.

A broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment was started (cefoperazone + sulbactam), with rapid improvement in general status and remission of fever and cough. A chest X-ray after 3 weeks showed marked remission (Figure 3). No indication for WLL was found, so follow-up without any treatment was the medical decision.

Figure 3

Case 1: Chest X-ray after 3 weeks.

After 6 months, he was evaluated again: he quit smoking, he had no respiratory symptoms, the physical examination was normal, chest X-ray and thoracic CT scan showed complete remission of crazy-paving areas with linear sequellae in median lobe (Figures 4 and 5A,B).

Figure 4

Case 1: Chest X-ray after 6 months.

Figure 5

(A and B). Case 1: CT scan after 6 months.

Conclusion in Case 1:mild PAP in infectious context, with spontaneous remission and good prognosis.

Case 2

A 34-year-old male patient, admitted for severe dyspnoea even at rest, frequent dry cough, night sweats, significant weight loss (≈15 kg in 12 months). The symptoms started 4 months ago, with progressive worsening. He was an active smoker of 20 pack-year and had important professional exposure to silica dust (48).

His general status was severely altered, he had cachexia (BMI = 17 kg/m2), cyanosis, saturation in room air was 72%, with 6 L of oxygen reached 90%, respiratory rate was 30/min. The chest murmur was diminished on the left thorax, and bilateral inspiratory crackles were audible.

Blood tests showed polycythaemia (Hb = 18.56 g/dL; Ht = 56.44%), leukocytosis (16.030/mm3).

Arterial blood gases were severely altered: PaO2 = 54.8 mmHg, PaCO2 = 69.7 mmHg, pH = 7.26, SaO2 = 87% (with 5 L/min O2).

The chest X-ray (Figure 6) showed “white lungs” and a partial left pneumothorax. A CT scan performed a few days before admission (Figure 7) revealed widespread “crazy-paving” with almost no normal areas, no pneumothorax.

Figure 6

Case 2: Chest X-ray at admission.

Figure 7

Case 2: CT scan before admission.

A bronchoalveolar lavage was done despite severe hypoxaemia and showed abundant PAS-positive material, supporting the diagnosis of PAP, probably secondary to silica dust exposure.

Because of the left pneumothorax, the WLL at the moment of diagnosis was impossible. A sequential therapeutic approach was started, with surgical tube drainage of the pneumothorax as the first step. Unfortunately, the lung failed to re-expand after 30 days, with the presence of a large broncho-pleural fistula.

The next step was the surgical intervention for the suture of fistula, with very risky anaesthetic and surgical conditions (the quality of lung tissue was not known and possible risk of dehiscent sutures). The postoperative evolution was good, with re-expansion of the left lung (Figure 8).

Figure 8

Case 2: Chest X-ray after surgery for left pneumothorax.

Then both lungs were consecutively washed by WLL 3 weeks apart, with excellent immediate evolution, both clinical and radiological.

Chest film showed great improvement after 3 months (Figure 9). Further exposure to silica was avoided, and no relapse occurred after years.

Figure 9

Case 2: Chest X-ray after 3 months.

Conclusion in Case 2:extremely severe form of secondary PAP probably related to professional exposure to silica dust; difficult therapeutic approach due to severity of the respiratory failure and left spontaneous pneumothorax; excellent results after only one WLL on each lung; good prognosis because of cessation of exposure.

Case 3

A 31-year-old non-smoker woman, with no professional exposure, who was diagnosed with an interstitial lung disease in 2011 which proved to be PAP after surgical lung biopsy from lingula.

She had multiple WLL on both the lungs because she had symptoms (dyspnoea on minimal efforts and cough), a reduction in lung volumes (vital capacity at 54% from predicted, FEV1 at 55% from predicted), desaturation on 6MWT (from 94% to 70% after 6 min), LDH was >1,000 U/L.

Despite good immediate results after each WLL, her symptoms and X-ray worsened every 3–6 months, demanding a new WLL (Figures 10,11,12,13).

Figure 10

Case 3: Chest X-ray at diagnosis.

Figure 11

Case 3: Chest X-ray after 2 years.

Figure 12

Case 3: Chest X-ray after 4 years.

Figure 13

Case 3: Chest X-ray after 7 years.

Conclusion in Case 3: A recurrent form of PAP (probably autoimmune form), demanding repeated WLL every 3–6 months; poor prognosis due to frequent relapses in the last 7 years.

Case 4

A 52-year-old non-smoker male with no professional exposure who was addressed to the pneumology department for dry cough and mild dyspnoea on exertion.

Chest X-ray showed bilateral alveolar opacities in both the lungs with lower lobe predominance (Figure 14).

Figure 14

Case 4: Chest X-ray at diagnosis of PAP.

Blood tests showed polycythaemia (Hb = 18.50 g/dL; Ht = 54.2%), elevated LDH (880 U/L), no inflammatory syndrome, number of leucocytes in a normal range.

Pulmonary function tests showed normal volumes and capacities, but low DLco (65% from predicted).

The 6MWT showed desaturation on effort (from 95% to 84%). Thoracic CT scan revealed widespread “crazy-paving” together with normal areas, giving to clinician a high suspicion of PAP (Figure 15A–D).

Figure 15

(A–D). Case 4: CT scan at diagnosis.

Bronchoalveolar lavage was done showing a milky fluid with abundant PAS-positive material, supporting the diagnosis of PAP.

A first WLL was done on the left lung with 15 L of saline, with good results.

After discharge from our hospital, the patient was evaluated in other services and haematologic diseases or other solid organ tumours were excluded.

In the next 10 months, the patient’s respiratory condition worsened, so after 6 months from diagnosis he already had signs of chronic respiratory failure; he had a second and a third WLL with a slight improvement and was discharged from hospital with oxygen at home.

In 4 months, he was admitted again, with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure (SaO2 = 75% in room air), frequent cough, orthopnoea, with bilateral inspiratory crackles. Chest X-ray (Figure 16) and CT scan (Figure 17A–D) showed impressive worsening, both the lungs are being occupied by a “crazy-paving” pattern, with almost no normal areas. He needed supplemental oxygen at high flow (reservoir-mask, high flow nasal cannula) to maintain SaO2 around 90%. His PaO2 was <50 mmHg in room air, with an elevated alveolar-arterial difference.

Figure 16

Case 4: Chest X-ray after 13 months from diagnosis.

Figure 17

(A–D). Case 4: CT scan after 13 months from diagnosis.

The autoantibodies against GM-CSF were positive (26 mg/mL), which proved the autoimmune nature of PAP.

He had several successive WLL on both lungs, but the patient’s condition was not much better despite its apparent usage (Figure 18 shows the fluid at the beginning and the end of WLL, much improved). He became bed-ridden and needed someone else to take care of him.

Figure 18

Case 4: Lavage fluid at the beginning and the end of WLL.

In front of this dramatic situation, we addressed other therapies, suitable for autoimmune PAP non-responsive to WLL: he had 5 days of plasmapheresis, followed by therapy with inhaled GM-CSF (Sargramostim 250 mg/day) for 15 days. A slight improvement was noted (better oxygenation), which allowed the patient to be discharged from the hospital, with oxygen at home. There, he continued to feel better, he obtained SaO2 >90% with only 5–6 L/min of oxygen and he could walk a short distance around the bed. This encouraged us to have a second session of plasmapheresis, followed by inhaled Sargramostim 250 mg/day for another 15 days. With this therapy, his condition continued to become better, and the last evaluation showed marked clinical improvement (SaO2 = 95% with 3 L/min O2 through a nasal cannula) and also a radiological one (Figure 19).

Figure 19

Case 4: Chest X-ray after two sessions of plasmapheresis and inhaled Sargramostim.

Conclusion in Case 4: extremely severe form of autoimmune PAP, refractory to repeated WLL; good response to alternative therapies (plasmapheresis, inhaled GM-CSF). Future concerns: how stable is this improvement? where to get from GM-CSF on a long-term basis, as it is an off-label prescription?

Conclusions

PAP is a heterogenic disease with unpredictable evolution, from spontaneous remission to death due to chronic respiratory failure or infections.

Considering this, if there is no indication for WLL (see above), patients should be followed-up to see whether the spontaneous evolution of the disease occurs.

Autoimmune PAP is the most frequent form; generally, it has a better prognosis than secondary PAP, with a good response to WLL.

Some cases need only one bilateral session of WLL, while others relapse frequently and need repeated WLL, being followed-up for years.

Smoking history, elevated serum LDH and KL-6 seem to predict a more severe disease with the risk of relapse and the need for repeated WLL.

eISSN:
2247-059X
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
Volume Open
Journal Subjects:
Medicine, Clinical Medicine, other, Internal Medicine, Pneumology