Open Access

Self-Presentation and Language Abstraction in Recruitment Context


Cite

Arcuri, L., Maass, A., & Portelli, G. (1993). Linguistic intergroup bias and implicit attributions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 277-285.10.1111/j.2044-8309.1993.tb01001.xSearch in Google Scholar

Assilaméhou, Y., & Testé, B. (2013). The effects of linguistic abstraction on evaluations of the speaker in an intergroup context: Using the linguistic intergroup bias makes you a good group member. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 113-119.10.1016/j.jesp.2012.08.001Search in Google Scholar

Assilaméhou, Y., Lepastourel, N., & Testé, B. (2013). How the linguistic intergroup bias affects group perception: Effects of language abstraction on generalization to the group. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(1), 98–108. do i:10.1080/00224545.2012.71138010.1080/00224545.2012.711380Search in Google Scholar

Beauvois, J. -L. (1995). La connaissance des utilités sociales [The knowledge of social utilities]. Psychologie Française, 40, 375-388.Search in Google Scholar

Beauvois, J. -L., & Dubois, N. (2008). Deux dimensions du jugement personnologique: Approche évaluative vs approche psychologique [Two dimensions of personological judgment: Evaluative vs. Psychological approach]. Psychologia Sociala, 21, 105-119.Search in Google Scholar

Burguet A. (2011). L’abtraction langagière dans le récit d’un fait divers: Des circonstances accablantes pour l’accusé [Language abstraction in the narrative of a miscellaneous event: Overwhelming circumstances for the accused]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 24(4), 23-44.Search in Google Scholar

Burguet, A., & Girard, F. (2008). La Coupe du Monde de Football 2006: Analyse de la production des biais linguistiques intergroupes [The Football World Cup 2006: analysis of the production of linguistic intergroup bias]. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 79(3), 85–95.10.3917/cips.079.0085Search in Google Scholar

Burguet, A., & Girard, F. (2011). Des biais linguistiques intergroupes ou comment discriminer l’autre simplement sans s’en rendre compte... ou presque [Inter-group language bias or how to simply discriminate without realizing it.. or almost ?]. In P. Castel, E. Salès-Wuillemin, & M.-F. Lacassagne (Eds.), Psychologie sociale, communication et langage. De la conception aux applications (pp. 51–71). Bruxelles: De Boeck.10.3917/dbu.caste.2011.01.0051Search in Google Scholar

Cambon L. (2004). La désirabilité sociale et l’utilité sociale des professions et des professionnels [The social desirability and social utility of professions and professionals]. In J. -L. Beauvois, R. V. Joule, J. -M. Monteil (Eds.), Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales, vol. 9, Rennes, Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Search in Google Scholar

Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Perugini, M. (1993). The “Big Five Questionnaire”: A new questionnaire to assess the five factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 15(3), 281–288. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90218-R10.1016/0191-8869(93)90218-RSearch in Google Scholar

Carnaghi, A., Maass, A., Gresta, S., Bianchi, M., Cadinu, M., & Arcuri, L. (2008). Nomina sunt omina: On the inductive potential of nouns and adjectives in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 839–859.10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.839Search in Google Scholar

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.10.1037/t07564-000Search in Google Scholar

Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2003). Effects of communication goals and expectancies on language abstraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4):682-696. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.68210.1037/0022-3514.84.4.682Search in Google Scholar

Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2006). When what you say about others says something about you: Language abstraction and inferences about describers’ attitudes and goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(4), 500–508.10.1016/j.jesp.2005.06.001Search in Google Scholar

Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & McGarty, C. (2008). Strategic language use in interpersonal and intergroup communication. In Y. Kashima, K. Fiedler, & P. Freytag (Eds.), Stereotype Dynamics: Language-Based Approaches to the Formation, Maintenance, and Transformation of Stereotypes (pp. 191–217). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Fiedler, K., Semin, G. R., & Finkenauer, C. (1993). The battle of words between gender groups: A language-based approach to intergroup processes. Human Communication Research, 19(3), 409–441.10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00308.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A., & Heyman, G. D. (1999). Carrot-eaters and creature-believers: The effects of lexicalization on children’s inferences about social categories. Psychological Science, 10(6), 489–493. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.0019410.1111/1467-9280.00194Search in Google Scholar

Geschke, D., Sassenberg, K., Ruhrmann, G., & Sommer, D. (2010). Effects of linguistic abstractness in the mass media: How newspaper articles shape readers’ attitudes toward migrants. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 22(3), 99–104. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a00001410.1027/1864-1105/a000014Search in Google Scholar

Gil de Montes, L., Semin, G. R., & Valencia, J. F. (2003). Communication patterns in interdependent relationships. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22(3), 259–281. doi:10.1177/0261927X0325538110.1177/0261927X03255381Search in Google Scholar

Heilman, M. E., Martell, R. F., & Simon, M. C. (1988). The vagaries of sex bias: Conditions regulating the undervaluation, equivaluation, and overvaluation of female job applicants. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 98-110.10.1016/0749-5978(88)90049-0Search in Google Scholar

Jellison, J. M., & Green, J. (1981). A self-presentation approach to the fundamental attribution error: The norm of internality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 643-649.10.1037/0022-3514.40.4.643Search in Google Scholar

Maass, A., Corvino, P., & Arcuri, L. (1994). Linguistic intergroup bias and the mass media. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 1, 31–43.Search in Google Scholar

Maass, A., Salvi, D., Arcuri, L., & Semin, G. R. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 981–993. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.98110.1037/0022-3514.57.6.981Search in Google Scholar

Marlowe, C. M., Schneider, S. L., & Nelson, C. E. (1996). Gender and attractiveness biases in hiring decisions: Are more experienced manager less biased? Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 11-21.10.1037/0021-9010.81.1.11Search in Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2006). Perspectives de la théorie des cinq facteurs (TCF): Traits et culture [Perspectives from the Five Factor Theory (FFT): Facts and Culture]. Psychologie Française, 51, 227–244.10.1016/j.psfr.2005.09.001Search in Google Scholar

Menegatti, M., & Rubini, M. (2013). Convincing similar and dissimilar others: The power of language abstraction in political communication. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(5), 596-607.10.1177/0146167213479404Search in Google Scholar

Moscatelli, S., Prati, F., & Rubini, M. (2019). If you criticize us, do it in concrete terms: Linguistic abstraction as a moderator of the intergroup sensitivity effect. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 38(5-6) 680–705. doi:10.1177/0261927X1986468610.1177/0261927X19864686Search in Google Scholar

Rubini, M., & Menegatti, M. (2008). Linguistic bias in personnel selection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27(2), 168–181.10.1177/0261927X07313653Search in Google Scholar

Rubini, M., & Menegatti, M. (2014). Hindering women’s careers in academia: Gender linguistic bias in personnel selection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(6), 632-650. doi:10.1177/0261927X1454243610.1177/0261927X14542436Search in Google Scholar

Rubini, M., & Sigall, H. (2002). Taking the edge off of disagreement: Linguistic abstractness and self-presentation to a heterogeneous audience. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(3), 343–351.10.1002/ejsp.94Search in Google Scholar

Rubini, M., Moscatelli, S., Albarello, F., & Palmonari, A. (2007). Group power as a determinant of interdependence and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(6), 1203–1221. doi:10.1002/ejsp.39110.1002/ejsp.391Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, J., & Fiedler, K. (1996). Language and implicit attributions in the Nuremberg trials: Analyzing prosecutors’ and defenses attorneys’ closing speeches. Human Communication Research, 22(3), 371–398. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb0037210.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00372.xSearch in Google Scholar

Schmid, J., Fiedler, K., Englich, B., Ehrenberger, T., & Semin, G. R. (1996). Taking sides with the defendant: Grammatical choice and the influence of implicit attributions in prosecution and defense speeches. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 12(2), 127–148.Search in Google Scholar

Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 558–568. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.55810.1037/0022-3514.54.4.558Search in Google Scholar

Shulman, J. L., Collins, K. A., & Clément, R. (2011). In consideration of social context: Reexamining the linguistic intergroup bias paradigm. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 4(4), 310–332.10.1080/17513057.2011.595498Search in Google Scholar

Watson, B. M., & Gallois, C. (2002). Patients’ interactions with health providers: A linguistic category model approach. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21(1), 32–52.10.1177/0261927X02021001003Search in Google Scholar

Werkman, W. M., Wigboldus, D. H. J., & Semin, G. R. (1999). Children’s communication of the linguistic intergroup bias and its impact upon cognitive inferences. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(1), 95–104. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199902)29:1<95::AID-EJSP898>3.0.CO;2-Z10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199902)29:1<95::AID-EJSP898>3.0.CO;2-ZSearch in Google Scholar

Wigboldus, D. H. J., & Douglas, K. M. (2007). Language, stereotypes, and intergroup relations. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social Communication (pp. 79–106). New York: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wigboldus, D. H. J., Semin, G. R., & Spears, R. (2000). How do we communicate stereotypes? Linguistic bases and inferential consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 5–18. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.510.1037/0022-3514.78.1.5Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2083-8506
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
Volume Open
Journal Subjects:
Social Sciences, Psychology, Applied Psychology