Linguistic Analysis of Statements Concerning Paintings Viewed Under Different Instructions by Experts and Novices in the Visual Arts

Barthes, R. (1981). Camera lucida: Reflections on Photography. New York: Hill & Wang.Search in Google Scholar

Belke, B., Leder, H., Strobach, T., & Carbon, C. -C. (2010). Cognitive fluency: High-level processing dynamics in art appreciation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(4), 214–222. doi: 10.1037/a001964810.1037/a0019648Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.10.1037/11164-000Search in Google Scholar

Bubić, A., Sušac, A., & Palmović, M. (2017). Observing individuals viewing art: The effects of titles on viewers eye-movement profiles. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 35(2), 194-213. doi: 10.1177/027623741668349910.1177/0276237416683499Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Cooper, J. M., & Silvia, P. J. (2009). Opposing art: Rejection as an action tendency of hostile aesthetic emotions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 27, 111–128. https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.27.1.f10.2190/EM.27.1.fOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Cupchik, G. C. (2011). The digitized self in the internet age. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(4), 318–328. doi: 10.1037/a002482010.1037/a0024820Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Cupchik, G. C. (2016). The aesthetics of emotion: Up the down staircase of the mind-body. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139169301Search in Google Scholar

Cupchik, G. C., & Gignac, A. (2007). Layering in art and in aesthetic experience. Visual Arts Research, 33(1), 56–71.Search in Google Scholar

Cupchik, G. C., & László, J. (1992). Emerging visions of the aesthetic process: Psychology, semiology and philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

de Paiva Vieira, M. (2011). Ekphrasis in “Girl with a Pearl Earring.” Scripta Uniandrade, 9(2), 11–29.10.18305/1679-5520/scripta.uniandrade.v9n2p10-28Search in Google Scholar

DeAngelus, M., & Pelz, J. B. (2009). Top-down control of eye movements: Yarbus revisited. Visual Cognition, 17(6–7), 790–811. doi: 10.1080/135062 8090279384310.1080/13506280902793843Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Di Dio, C., & Gallese, V. (2009). Neuroaesthetics: A review. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 19, 682–687. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2009.09.00110.1016/j.conb.2009.09.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215–251. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.21510.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Francuz, P., Jankowski, T., & Augustynowicz, P. (in the review). What do you mean when you say you like this painting?Search in Google Scholar

Francuz, P., Zaniewski, I., Augustynowicz, P., Kopiś, N., & Jankowski, T. (2018). Eye movement correlates of expertise in visual arts. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12(87), 1–13. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00087/full10.3389/fnhum.2018.00087/fullOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Freedberg, D., & Gallese, V. (2007). Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(5), 197–203. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.02.00310.1016/j.tics.2007.02.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gerger, G., & Leder, H. (2015). Titles change the esthetic appreciations of paintings. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(464), 1–10. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.0046410.3389/fnhum.2015.00464Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gombrich, E. H. (1995). The story of art (16th ed.). London: Phaidon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hirsh, J. B., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). Personality and language use in self-narratives. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 524–527. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.00610.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Jahoda, G. (2005). Theodor Lipps and the shift from “sympathy” to “empathy.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 41(2), 151–163. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.2008010.1002/jhbs.20080Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Jakesch, M., & Leder, H. (2009). Finding meaning in art: Preferred levels of ambiguity in art appreciation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(11), 2105–2112. doi: 10.1080/1747021090303897410.1080/17470210903038974Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Jucker, J. -L., Barrett, J. L., & Wlodarski, R. (2014). “I just don’t get it”: Perceived artists’ intentions affect art evaluations. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 32(2), 149–182. doi: 10.2190/EM.32.2.c10.2190/EM.32.2.cOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1989). The visual environment: Public participation in design and planning. Journal of Social Issues, 45(1), 59–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1989.tb01533.x10.1111/j.1540-4560.1989.tb01533.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Keplinger, C. (2006). Mystery appeal: Effects of uncertainty and resolution on the enjoyment of mystery. Media Psychology, 8(3), 193–212. doi: 10.1207/s1532785xmep0803_110.1207/s1532785xmep0803_1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kuchinke, L., Trapp, S., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). Pupillary responses in art appreciation: Effects of aesthetic emotions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3): 156–163. doi: 10.1037/a001446410.1037/a0014464Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489–508. doi: 10.1348/000712604236981110.1348/0007126042369811Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Leder, H., Carbon, C. C., & Ripsas, A. L. (2006). Entitling art: Influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings. Acta Psychologica, 121(2), 176–198. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.00510.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Leder, H., Gerger, G., Brieber, D., & Schwarz, N. (2014). What makes an art expert? Emotion and evaluation in art appreciation. Cognition & Emotion, 28(6), 1137–1147. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.87013210.1080/02699931.2013.870132Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Levinson, J. (1985). Titles. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 44(1), 29–39. doi: 10.2307/43053710.2307/430537Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Locher, P., Krupinski, E. A., Mello-Thoms, C., & Nodine, C. F. (2007). Visual interest in pictorial art during an aesthetic experience. Spatial Vision, 21(1–2), 55–77. doi: 10.1163/15685680878271376210.1163/156856808782713762Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Massaro, D., Savazzi, F., Di Dio, C., Freedberg, D., Gallese, V., Gilli, G., & Marchetti, A. (2012). When art moves the eyes: A behavioral and eye-tracking study. PLoS ONE, 7(5), 1–16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.003728510.1371/journal.pone.0037285Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

McSorley, E., & McCloy, R. (2011). The impact of domain and expertise on aesthetic experience: An eye movement study. In Poster to the European Conference of Visual Perception (Toulouse, France).Search in Google Scholar

Mehl, M. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2003). The sounds of social life: A psychometric analysis of students’ daily social environments and natural conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 857–870. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.85710.1037/0022-3514.84.4.857Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Millis, K. (2001). Making meaning brings pleasure: The influence of titles on aesthetic experiences. Emotion, 1(3), 320–329. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.32010.1037/1528-3542.1.3.320Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mills, M., Hollingworth, A., van der Stigchel, S., Hoffman, L., & Dodd, M. D. (2011). Examining the influence of task set on eye movements and fixations. Journal of Vision, 11(8), 1–15. doi: 10.1167/11.8.1710.1167/11.8.17Search in Google Scholar

Mullennix, J. W., & Robinet, J. (2018). Art expertise and the processing of titled abstract art. Perception, 47(4), 359–378. doi: 10.1177/030100661775231410.1177/0301006617752314Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Nodine, C. F., Locher, P. J., & Krupinski, E. A. (1993). The role of formal art training on perception and aesthetic judgment of art compositions. Leonardo, 26(3), 219–227. doi: 10.2307/157581510.2307/1575815Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Pelowski, M., Markey, P. S., Forster, M., Gerger, G., & Leder, H. (2017). Move me, astonish me… delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna integrated model of top-down and bottom-up processes in art perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates. Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 80–125. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2017.02.00310.1016/j.plrev.2017.02.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Pelowski, M., Markey, P. S., Lauring, J. O., & Leder, H. (2016). Visualizing the impact of art: An update and comparison of current psychological models of art experience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 1–21. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.0016010.3389/fnhum.2016.00160Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Pennebaker, J. W., & King, L. A. (1999). Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1296–1312. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.129610.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1296Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., & Booth, R. (2007). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. [Computer software]. Austin: LIWC.net.Search in Google Scholar

Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2007). Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC): LIWC 2007. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4): 364–382. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_310.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Roald, T. (2007). Cognition in emotion: An investigation through experiences with art. New York: Rodopi.10.1163/9789401205344Search in Google Scholar

Russell, P. A. (2003). Effort after meaning and the hedonic value of paintings. British Journal of Psychology, 94(1), 99–110. doi: 10.1348/00071260376284213810.1348/000712603762842138Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Scherer, K. R. (2001). Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. In T. Johnstone (Ed.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 92–120). New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schwarz, N. (2012). Feelings-as-information theory. In: P. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski and E.T. Higgins (Eds). Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 289–308). London: Sage.10.4135/9781446249215.n15Search in Google Scholar

Silvia, P. J. (2005). Emotional responses to art: From collation and arousal to cognition and emotion. Review of General Psychology, 9, 342–357. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.9.4.34210.1037/1089-2680.9.4.342Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Silvia, P. J. (2006). Exploring the psychology of interest. New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195158557.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780195158557.001.0001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Silvia, P. J. (2009). Looking past pleasure: Anger, confusion, disgust, pride, surprise, and other unusual aesthetic emotions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(1), 48–51. doi: 10.1037/a001463210.1037/a0014632Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Silvia, P. J., & Brown, E. M. (2007). Anger, disgust, and the negative aesthetic emotions: Expanding an appraisal model of aesthetic experience. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 100–106. doi: 10.1037/1931-3896.1.2.10010.1037/1931-3896.1.2.100Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Stamatopoulou, D. (2017). Empathy and the aesthetic: Why does art still move us? Cognitive Processing, 19(2), 169–186. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0836-310.1007/s10339-017-0836-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Stamps, A. (2004). Mystery, complexity, legibility and coherence: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00023-910.1016/S0272-4944(03)00023-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Swami, V. (2013). Context matters: Investigating the impact of contextual information on aesthetic appreciation of paintings by Max Ernst and Pablo Picasso. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 285–295. doi: 10.1037/a003096510.1037/a0030965Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Szymczyk, B., Żakowicz, W., & Stemplewska-Żakowicz, K. (2012). Computerized text analysis: Polish adaptation of James Pennebaker’s LIWC dictionary. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 55(2): 195–209.Search in Google Scholar

Tatler, B. W., Wade, N. J., Kwan, H., Findlay, J. M., & Velichkovsky, B. M. (2010). Yarbus, eye movements, and vision. I-Perception, 1(1), 7–27. doi: 10.1068/i038210.1068/i0382Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54. doi: 10.1177/0261927X0935167610.1177/0261927X09351676Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Thömmes, K., & Hübner, R. (2014). A picture is worth a word: The effect of titles on aesthetic judgments. In A. Kozbelt (Ed.), Proceedings of the twenty-third Biennial Congress of the International Association of Empirical Aesthetics (pp. 599–603).Search in Google Scholar

Vogt, S., & Magnussen, S. (2007). Expertise in pictorial perception: Eye-movement patterns and visual memory in artists and laymen. Perception, 36(1), 91–100. doi: 10.1068/p526210.1068/p5262Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Waligórska, A. (2006). The eye and narration. Relations of artistic expertise and mode of interpretation of narrative and non-narrative paintings. Psychology of Language and Communication, 10(1), 45–64.Search in Google Scholar

Weston, S. J., Cox, K. S., Condon, D. M., & Jackson, J. J. (2016). A comparison of human narrative coding of redemption and automated linguistic analysis for understanding life stories. Journal of Personality, 84(5), 594–606. doi: 10.1111/jopy.1218310.1111/jopy.12183Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4899-5379-7Search in Google Scholar