Parent-Child Conversations About Biological Kinds as a Potential Contributor to the Variability in Biological Knowledge

Anggoro, F. K., Waxman, S. R., & Medin, D. L. (2008). Naming practices and the acquisition of key biological concepts: Evidence from English and Indonesian. Psychological Science, 19(4), 314–319. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02086.x10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02086.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Astuti, R., Solomon, G. E. A., Carey, S., Ingold, T., & Miller, P. (2004). Constraints on Conceptual Development: A Case Study of the Acquisition of Folkbiological and Folksociological Knowledge in Madagascar. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 69(3), I-161. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3701405Search in Google Scholar

Backscheider, A. G., Shatz, M., & Gelman, S. A. (1993). Preschoolers’ ability to distinguish living kinds as a function of regrowth. Child Development, 64(4), 1242–1257. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb04198.x10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb04198.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bailenson, J. N., Shum, M. S., Atran, S., Medin, D. L., & Coley, J. D. (2002). A bird’s eye view: Biological categorization and reasoning within and across cultures. Cognition, 84(1), 1–53. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00011-210.1016/S0010-0277(02)00011-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bokus, B. (2000). Światy fabuły w narracji dziecięcej. Warszawa: Energia.Search in Google Scholar

Bornstein, M. H. (2012). Cultural approaches to parenting. Parenting, 12(2–3), 212–221. doi: 10.1080/15295192.2012.68335910.1080/15295192.2012.683359Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Cameron-Faulkner, T., Macdonald, R., Serratrice, L., Melville, J., & Gattis, M. (2017). Plant yourself where language blooms: Direct experience of nature changes how parents and children talk about nature. Children, Youth and Environments, 27(2), 110–124. doi: 10.7721/chilyoutenvi.27.2.011010.7721/chilyoutenvi.27.2.0110Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Carey, S. (1999). Sources of conceptual change. In: E. K. Scholnick, K. Nelson, S. A. Gelman, & P. H. Miller (Eds.) Conceptual development: Piaget’s legacy (pp 293–326). New York: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Coley, J. D. (2012). Where the wild things are: Informal experience and ecological reasoning. Child Development, 83(3), 992–1006. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01751.x10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01751.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Crowley, K., & Jacobs, M. (2002). Building islands of expertise in everyday family activity. in G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds). Learning conversations in museums (pp 333-356). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Search in Google Scholar

Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Jipson, J. L., Galco, J., Topping, K., & Shrager, J. (2001). Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent-child activity. Science Education, 85(6), 712–732. doi: 10.1002/sce.103510.1002/sce.1035Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fender, J. G., & Crowley, K. (2007). How parent explanation changes what children learn from everyday scientific thinking. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28(3), 189–210. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2007.02.00710.1016/j.appdev.2007.02.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fisher, A. V., Godwin, K. E., & Matlen, B. J. (2015). Development of inductive generalization with familiar categories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(5), 1149–1173. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0816-510.3758/s13423-015-0816-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Geerdts, M. S., Van de Walle, G. A., & LoBue, V. (2015). Parent-child conversations about animals in informal learning environments. Visitor Studies, 18(1), 39–63. doi: 10.1080/10645578.2015.101636610.1080/10645578.2015.1016366Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford Series in Cognitive Develoment. New York: Oxford University Press10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195154061.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A., & Kremer, K. E. (1991). Understanding natural cause: Children’s explanations of how objects and their properties originate. Child Development, 62(2), 396–414. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01540.x10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01540.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A., & Markman, E. M. (1986). Categories and induction in young children. Cognition, 23(3), 183–209. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(86)90034-X10.1016/0010-0277(86)90034-XOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (1991). Insides and essences: Early understandings of the non-obvious. Cognition, 38(3), 213–244. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90007-Q10.1016/0010-0277(91)90007-QOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A., Coley, J. D., Rosengren, K. S., Hartman, E., & Pappas, A. (1998). Beyond labeling: The role of maternal input in the acquisition of richly structured categories. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63(1), i-148. doi: 10.2307/116621110.2307/1166211Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A., Raman, L., & Gentner, D. (2009). Effects of language and similarity on comparison processing. Language Learning and Development, 5(3), 147–171. doi: 10.1080/1547544090282407910.1080/15475440902824079Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A., Ware, E. A., Kleinberg, F., Manczak, E. M., & Stilwell, S. M. (2014). Individual differences in children’s and parents’ generic language. Child Development, 85(3), 924–940. doi: 10.1111/cdev.1218710.1111/cdev.12187Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155–170. doi: 10.1016/S0364-0213(83)80009-310.1016/S0364-0213(83)80009-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gobbo, C., & Chi, M. (1986). How knowledge is structured and used by expert and novice children. Cognitive Development, 1(3), 221–237. doi: 10.1016/S0885-2014(86)80002-810.1016/S0885-2014(86)80002-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Graham, S. A., Namy, L. L., Gentner, D., & Meagher, K. (2010). The role of comparison in preschoolers’ novel object categorization. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107(3), 280–290. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.04.01710.1016/j.jecp.2010.04.017Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hirschfeld, L. A., & Gelman, S. A. (Eds.). (1994). Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511752902Search in Google Scholar

Inagaki, K. (1990). The effects of raising animals on children’s biological knowledge. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8(2), 119–129. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1990.tb00827.x10.1111/j.2044-835X.1990.tb00827.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2002). Young children’s thinking about biological world. New York: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (1993). Young children’s understanding of the mind-body distinction. Child Development, 64(5), 1534–1549.10.2307/1131551Search in Google Scholar

Jipson, J. L., & Callanan, M. A. (2003). Mother–child conversation and children’s understanding of biological and nonbiological changes in size. Child Development, 74(2), 629–644. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.740202010.1111/1467-8624.7402020Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kelemen, D. (1999). Function, goals and intention: Children’s teleological reasoning about objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 461–468. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01402-310.1016/S1364-6613(99)01402-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Leddon, E.M., Waxman, S.R., Medin, (2011). What does it mean to ‘live’ and ‘die’? A cross-linguistic analysis of parent-child conversations in English and Indonesian. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(3): 375–395. doi: 10.1348/026151010X49085810.1348/026151010X490858Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Medin, D. L., & Atran, S. (2004). The native mind: biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. Psychological Review, 111(4), 960-983. doi :10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.96010.1037/0033-295X.111.4.960Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Medin, D. L., Lynch, E. B., Coley, J. D., & Atran, S. (1997). Categorization and reasoning among tree experts: Do all roads lead to Rome? Cognitive Psychology, 32(1), 49–96. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1997.064510.1006/cogp.1997.0645Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Medin, D. L., Waxman, S., Woodring, J., & Washinawatok, K. (2010). Human-centeredness is not a universal feature of young children’s reasoning: Culture and experience matter when reasoning about biological entities. Cognitive Development, 25(3), 197–207. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.02.00110.1016/j.cogdev.2010.02.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Murphy, G. (2004). The big book of concepts. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Namy, L. L., & Gentner, D. (2002). Making a silk purse out of sow’s ears: Young children’s use of comparison in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 5–15. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.131.1.510.1037/0096-3445.131.1.5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington DC: National Academies Press.Search in Google Scholar

Opfer, J. E., & Siegler, R. S. (2004). Revisiting preschoolers’ living things concept: A microgenetic analysis of conceptual change in basic biology. Cognitive Psychology, 49(4), 301–332. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.01.00210.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.01.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Palmquist, S., & Crowley, K. (2007). From teachers to testers: How parents talk to novice and expert children in a natural history museum. Science Education, 91(5), 783–804. doi: 10.1002/sce.2021510.1002/sce.20215Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1951). The child’s conception of the world (No. 213). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar

Poziomek, U., Tarłowski, A., Marszał, D., & Ostrowska, E. B. (2015). Edukacja przyrodnicza małych dzieci–opis przyrody czy jej badanie? Edukacja Biologiczna i Środowiskowa, 4, 48–61.Search in Google Scholar

Rigney, J. C., & Callanan, M. A. (2011). Patterns in parent–child conversations about animals at a marine science center. Cognitive Development, 26(2), 155–171. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.12.00210.1016/j.cogdev.2010.12.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rosengren, K. S., Gelman, S. A., Kalish, C. W., & McCormick, M. (1991). As time goes by: Children’s early understanding of growth in animals. Child Development, 62(6), 1302–1320. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01607.x10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01607.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ross, N., Medin, D., Coley, J. D., & Atran, S. (2003). Cultural and experiential differences in the development of folkbiological induction. Cognitive Development, 18(1), 25–47. doi: 10.1016/S0885-2014(02)00142-910.1016/S0885-2014(02)00142-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rybska, E. (2017). Przyroda w osobistych koncepcjach dziecięcych – implikacje dla jej nauczania z wykorzystaniem rysunku. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Kontekst.Search in Google Scholar

Shafto, P., & Coley, J. D. (2003). Development of categorization and reasoning in the natural world: Novices to experts, naive similarity to ecological knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(4), 641-649. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.64110.1037/0278-7393.29.4.641Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Shafto, P., Coley, J. D., & Vitkin, A. (2007). Availability in category-based induction. In: A. Feeney and E. Heit (Eds.) Inductive reasoning: Experimental, developmental, and computational approaches (pp 114–136), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO978051161930410.1017/CBO9780511619304Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Skura, M. & Lisicki, M. (2012). Na progu. Ile w dziecku ucznia, a w nauczycielu mistrza? O co chodzi w pierwszej klasie? Warszawa: Ośrodek Rozwoju EdukacjiSearch in Google Scholar

Solomon, G. E., Johnson, S. C., Zaitchik, D., & Carey, S. (1996). Like father, like son: Young children’s understanding of how and why offspring resemble their parents. Child Development, 67(1), 151–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01726.x10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01726.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Springer, K., & Keil, F. C. (1989). On the development of biologically specific beliefs: The case of inheritance. Child Development, 637–648. doi: 10.2307/113072910.2307/1130729Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Tare, M., French, J., Frazier, B. N., Diamond, J., & Evans, E. M. (2011). Explanatory parent–child conversation predominates at an evolution exhibit. Science Education, 95(4), 720–744. doi: 10.1002/sce.2043310.1002/sce.20433Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Tarłowski, A. (2006). If it’s an animal it has axons: Experience and culture in preschool children’s reasoning about animates. Cognitive Development, 21(3), 249–265. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.02.00110.1016/j.cogdev.2006.02.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Tarłowski, A. (2017). The reliance on inclusive living thing in inductive inference among 5-year-olds: the role of access to nature and the size of receptive vocabulary. Psychology of Language and Communication, 21(1), 109–132. doi: 10.1515/plc-2017-000610.1515/plc-2017-0006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Valle, A., & Callanan, M. A. (2006). Similarity comparisons and relational analogies in parent-child conversations about science topics. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52(1), 96–124. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2309606910.1353/mpq.2006.0009Search in Google Scholar

Waxman, S., Medin, D., & Ross, N. (2007). Folkbiological reasoning from a cross-cultural developmental perspective: Early essentialist notions are shaped by cultural beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 294-308. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.29410.1037/0012-1649.43.2.294Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Waxman, S. R., Herrmann, P., Woodring, J., & Medin, D. L. (2014). Humans (really) are animals: Picture-book reading influences 5-year-old urban children’s construal of the relation between humans and non-human animals. Frontiers in Psychology, 5:172. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.0017210.3389/fpsyg.2014.00172Open DOISearch in Google Scholar