Open Access

Are Neural Substrates of Language and Communication Distinct?

   | Aug 28, 2014
Psychology of Language and Communication's Cover Image
Psychology of Language and Communication
Children's Language and Communicative Knowledge, Part One. In Memory of Professor Grace Wales Shugar, Issue Editor: Barbara Bokus

Cite

van Ackeren, M. J., Casasanto, D., Bekkering, H., Hagoort, P., & Ruschemeyer, S.A. (2012). Pragmatics in action: Indirect and the cortical motor network. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24 (11), 2237-2247.10.1162/jocn_a_00274Search in Google Scholar

Apperly, I.A., Samson, D., Carroll, N., Hussain, S., & Humphreys, G.W. (2006). Intact first and second-order false belief reasoning in a patient with severely impaired grammar. Social Neuroscience, 1 (3/4), 334-348.10.1080/17470910601038693Search in Google Scholar

Astington, J.W. & Baird, J.A. (2005). Why Language Matters for Theory of Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195159912.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Austin, L.J. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bašnáková, J., Weber, K., Petersson,K., van Berkum, J., & Hagoort, P. (2013). Beyond the language given: The neural correlates of inferring speaker meaning. Cerebral Cortex [epub ahead of print].Search in Google Scholar

Bickerton, D. (1995). Language and Human Behavior. London: UCL Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2002). Syntactic Structures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110218329Search in Google Scholar

Devlin, K. (1999). Żegnaj, Kartezjuszu. Rozstanie z logiką w poszukiwaniu nowej kosmologii umysłu [Goodbye, Descartes. The End of Logic and the Search for a New Cosmology of the Mind]. Warszawa: Prószyński i S-ka.Search in Google Scholar

Dodell-Feder, D., Koster-Hale, J., Bedny, M., & Saxe, R. (2011). fMRI item analysis in a theory of mind task. NeuroImage, 55 (2), 705-712.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.040Search in Google Scholar

Egorova, N., Pulvermüller, F., & Shtyrov, Y. (2014). Neural dynamics of speech act comprehension: An MEG study of naming and requesting. Brain Topography, 27 (3), 375-392.10.1007/s10548-013-0329-3Search in Google Scholar

Fedorenko, E., Behr, M.K., & Kanwisher, N. (2011). Functional specificity for highlevel linguistic processing in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, 108 (39), 16428-16433.10.1073/pnas.1112937108Search in Google Scholar

Ferstl, E.C., Neumann, J., Bogler, C., & von Cramon, D.Y. (2008). The extended language network: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 29 (5), 581-593.10.1002/hbm.20422Search in Google Scholar

Fitch, T., Hauser, M., & Chomsky, N. (2005). The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition, 97 (2),179-210.10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.005Search in Google Scholar

Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Pres.Search in Google Scholar

Hagoort, P. (2013). MUC (Memory, Unification, Control) and beyond. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1-13.10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00416Search in Google Scholar

Hauser, M.D., Chomsky. N., & Tecumseh Fitch, W. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569-1579.10.1126/science.298.5598.1569Search in Google Scholar

Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J.B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics. Selected Readings (pp. 269-293). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, R. & Pinker, S. (2005). The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language. Cognition, 97 (2), 211-225.10.1016/j.cognition.2005.04.006Search in Google Scholar

Kurcz, I. (1993). Psycholingwistyka [Psycholinguistics]. In I. Kurcz (Ed.), Psychologia a semiotyka. Pojęcia i zagadnienia [Psychology and Semiotics. Concepts and Issues] (pp. 25-46). Warszawa: Zakład Semiotyki Logicznej Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.Search in Google Scholar

Kurcz, I. (2005). Psychologia języka i komunikacji [Psychology of Language and Communication]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.Search in Google Scholar

Mather, M., Cacioppo, J.T., & Kanwisher, N. (2013). How fMRI can inform cognitive theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8 (1),108-113.10.1177/1745691612469037Search in Google Scholar

Milligan, K., Astington, J.W., & Dack, L.A. (2007). Language and Theory of Mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development, 78 (2), 622-646.10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01018.xSearch in Google Scholar

Levinson, S. (2000). Presumptive Meaning: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mahy, C., Moses, L., & Pfeifer, J. (2014). How and where: Theory-of-mind in the brain. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 68-81.10.1016/j.dcn.2014.01.002Search in Google Scholar

Mather, M., Cacioppo, J.T., & Kanwisher, N. (2013). Introduction to the special section: 20 years of fMRI - What has it done for understanding cognition? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8 (1), 41-43.10.1177/1745691612469036Search in Google Scholar

Meltzoff, A.N. (2007). “Like me”: A foundation for social cognition. Developmental Science, 10 (1), 126-134. Olineck, K.M. & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2007). Imitation of intentional actions and internal state language in infancy predict preschool theory of mind skills. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4 (1), 14-30. Search in Google Scholar

van Overwalle, F. & Baetens, K. (2009). Understanding others’ actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: A meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 48 (3), 564-584.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.009Search in Google Scholar

Pinker, S. & Jackendoff, R. (2005). The faculty of language: What’s special about it? Cognition, 95 (2), 201-236.10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004Search in Google Scholar

Varley, R., Siegal, M., & Want, S. (2001). Severe impairment in grammar does not preclude theory of mind. Neurocase, 7 (6), 489-493. de Villiers, J. (2002). Complements to cognition: A longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false-belief-understanding. Cognitive Development, 17 (1), 1037-1060. Search in Google Scholar

de Villiers, J. (2007). The interface of language and theory of mind. Lingua, 117 (11), 1858-1878. 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.006Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2083-8506
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
Volume Open
Journal Subjects:
Social Sciences, Psychology, Applied Psychology