[Arnon, I. (2010). Starting Big: The Role of Multi-Word Phrases in Language Learning and Use. Unpublished Dissertation, Stanford University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Arnon, I. (2011). Relative clause acquisition in Hebrew and the learning of constructions. In E. Kidd (Ed.), The Acquisition of Relative Clauses: Processing, Typology, and Function (pp. 81-106). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bannard, C., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Modeling children’s early grammatical knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 17284-17289.10.1073/pnas.0905638106]Search in Google Scholar
[Bloom, L. (1970). Language Development: Form and Function in Emerging Grammars. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bloom, L. & Lahey, M. (1978). Language Development and Language Disorders. New York: John Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bowerman, M. (1976). Semantic factors in the acquisition of rules for word use and sentence construction. In D. Morehead & A. Morehead (Eds.), Directions in Normal and Deficient Child Language (pp. 99-179). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bowerman, M. (1978). Words and sentences: Uniformity, individual variation, and shifts over time in patterns of acquisition. In F.D. Minifie & L.L. Lloyd (Eds.), Communicative and Cognitive Abilities - Early Behavioral Assessment (pp. 355-371). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Braine, M.D.S. (1963). The ontogeny of English phrase structure: The first phase. Language, 39, 1‑13.10.2307/410757]Search in Google Scholar
[Braine, M.D.S. (1976). Children’s first word combinations. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 41, 164.10.2307/1165959]Search in Google Scholar
[Brown, R. (1973). A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674732469]Search in Google Scholar
[Brown, R. & Bellugi, U. (1964). Three processes in the child’s acquisition of syntax.\ Harvard Educational Review, 34, 133‑151.10.17763/haer.34.2.c5263w0q03222r14]Search in Google Scholar
[Brown, R. & Fraser, C. (1963). The acquisition of syntax. In C.N. Cofer & B.S. Musgrave (Eds.), Verbal Behavior and Learning: Problems and Processes (pp. 158-197). New York: McGraw-Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Deuchar, M. & Quay, S. (2000). Bilingual Acquisition: Theoretical Implications of a Case Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Diessel, H. (2013). Construction Grammar and first language acquisition. In G. Trousdale & T. Hoffmann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 347-364). Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ellis, N.C. (2003). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. Doughty & M.H. Long, (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 33-68). Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ervin‑Tripp, S.M. (1966). Language development. In L.W. Hoffman & M.L. Hoffman (Eds.), Review of Child Development Research. Vol. 2 (pp. 55‑105). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Francis, W.N. & Kučera, H. (1979). Brown Corpus Manual of Information to Accompany a Standard Corpus of Present - Day American English, Revised and Amplified. Providence, RI: Brown University, Department of Linguistics.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gentner, D. (1978). On relational meaning: the acquisition of verb meaning. Child Development, 49, 988-998.10.2307/1128738]Search in Google Scholar
[Gleitman, L. & Wanner, E. (1982). Language acquisition: the state of the state of the art. In E. Wanner & L. Gleitman (Eds.), Language Acquisition: The State of the Art (pp. 1-50). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goodman, J.C., Dale, P.S., & Li, P. (2008). Does frequency count? Parental input and the acquisition of vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 35, 515-531.10.1017/S0305000907008641]Search in Google Scholar
[Hudson, R. (1990). English Word Grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lieven, E.V.M., Pine, J.M., & Baldwin, G. (1997). Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language, 24, 187-219.10.1017/S0305000996002930]Search in Google Scholar
[Lieven, E., Behrens, H., Speares, J., & Tomasello, M. (2003). Early syntactic creativity: A usage-based approach. Journal of Child Language, 30, 333-370.10.1017/S0305000903005592]Search in Google Scholar
[Lieven, E., Salomo, D., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Two-year-old children’s production of multiword utterances: A usage-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 20, 481-508.10.1515/COGL.2009.022]Search in Google Scholar
[Macnamara, J. (1972). Cognitive basis of language learning in infants. Psychological Review, 79, 1‑14.10.1037/h0031901]Search in Google Scholar
[MacWhinney, B. (1982). Basic syntactic processes. In S.A. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language Development: Vol. 1. Syntax and Semantics (pp. 73-136). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[MacWhinney, B. & Snow, C. (1985). The child language data exchange system. Journal of Child Language, 12, 271‑295.10.1017/S0305000900006449]Search in Google Scholar
[McCune, L. (2013). Developing a Linguistic Medium: From Words for Things to Words for Grammar. Unpublished manuscript, Rutgers University, NJ.]Search in Google Scholar
[McCune, L. & Vihman, M.M. (1999). Relational words and motion events: A universal bootstrap to syntax. Paper presented at the SRCD Biennial Meeting, Albuquerque, NM.]Search in Google Scholar
[McCune-Nicolich, L. (1981). The cognitive bases of early relational words. Journal of Child Language, 8, 15-36.10.1017/S0305000900002981]Search in Google Scholar
[Ninio, A. (1988). On formal grammatical categories in early child language. In Y. Levy, I.M. Schlesinger, & M.D.S. Braine (Eds.), Categories and Processes in Language Acquisition (pp. 99-119). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ninio, A. (1999). Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of Child Language, 26, 619-653.10.1017/S0305000999003931]Search in Google Scholar
[Ninio, A. (2006). Language and the Learning Curve: A New Theory of Syntactic Development. Oxford: O.U.P.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199299829.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Ninio, A. (2011). Syntactic Development, Its Input and Output. Oxford: O.U.P.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199565962.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Ninio, A. (2014). Learning a generative syntax from transparent syntactic atoms in the linguistic input. Journal of Child Language.10.1017/S0305000913000470]Search in Google Scholar
[Peirce, C.S. (1865/1982). Logic of the sciences. In M. Fisch, C. Kloesel, E. Moore, N. Houser et al. (Eds.), The Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition. Vol. 1 (pp. 322-336). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peters, A.M. (1983). The Units of Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pine, J. M. & Lieven, E.V.M. (1993). Reanalyzing rote‑learned phrases: Individual differences in the transition to multi‑word speech. Journal of Child Language, 20, 551‑571.]Search in Google Scholar
[Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reboul, A. (2001). Foundations of reference and predication. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher, & W. Raible (Eds.), Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook. Vol. 1 (pp. 509-522). Berlin: De Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tesniere, L. (1959). Elements de Syntaxe Structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tomasello, M. (1992). First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511527678]Search in Google Scholar
